双重制度下的牺牲率估算:来自印度视角的证据

D. Sharma, Amritkant Mishra
{"title":"双重制度下的牺牲率估算:来自印度视角的证据","authors":"D. Sharma, Amritkant Mishra","doi":"10.1142/s1793993323500060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This investigation applies a VAR and an ARDL model to estimate the sacrifice ratio in the period of 1968–2018 subject to two regimes in India. The range for the sacrifice ratio mostly lies between [Formula: see text]0.5 and 1 for the period of 1968–2002 while also experiencing sensitive shifts of [Formula: see text]10 and 15. For the period of 2002–2018, the ratio lies between [Formula: see text]3 and 5. Furthermore, the long run estimate of the sacrifice ratio is [Formula: see text]2.35 and the short run is [Formula: see text]0.35. It is concluded that the period of 1968–2002 was more sensitive and more prone to disinflationary costs than gains while the period of 2002–2018 is more resilient and is characterized by both costs and gains to disinflation. The gains from disinflation for the period of 2002–2018 exceed those of the period of 1968–2002. In a comparative perspective, the costs to disinflation for India are much less than the usual range of the sacrifice ratio for advanced economies.","PeriodicalId":44073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Commerce Economics and Policy","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimations of the Sacrifice Ratio Through Dual Regimes: An Evidence from Indian Perspective\",\"authors\":\"D. Sharma, Amritkant Mishra\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/s1793993323500060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This investigation applies a VAR and an ARDL model to estimate the sacrifice ratio in the period of 1968–2018 subject to two regimes in India. The range for the sacrifice ratio mostly lies between [Formula: see text]0.5 and 1 for the period of 1968–2002 while also experiencing sensitive shifts of [Formula: see text]10 and 15. For the period of 2002–2018, the ratio lies between [Formula: see text]3 and 5. Furthermore, the long run estimate of the sacrifice ratio is [Formula: see text]2.35 and the short run is [Formula: see text]0.35. It is concluded that the period of 1968–2002 was more sensitive and more prone to disinflationary costs than gains while the period of 2002–2018 is more resilient and is characterized by both costs and gains to disinflation. The gains from disinflation for the period of 2002–2018 exceed those of the period of 1968–2002. In a comparative perspective, the costs to disinflation for India are much less than the usual range of the sacrifice ratio for advanced economies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Commerce Economics and Policy\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Commerce Economics and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/s1793993323500060\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Commerce Economics and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s1793993323500060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究应用VAR和ARDL模型估计了印度两种制度下1968-2018年期间的牺牲率。在1968-2002年期间,牺牲率的范围主要介于[公式:见文]0.5和1之间,同时也经历了[公式:见文]10和15的敏感偏移。2002年至2018年期间,该比率介于[公式:见文本]3和5之间。此外,牺牲率的长期估计值为[公式:见文]2.35,短期估计值为[公式:见文]0.35。得出的结论是,1968-2002年期间比收益更敏感,更容易出现反通胀成本,而2002-2018年期间更具弹性,其特点是反通胀成本和收益并存。2002年至2018年期间,反通胀带来的收益超过了1968年至2002年期间。从比较的角度来看,印度的反通胀成本远低于发达经济体通常的牺牲率范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimations of the Sacrifice Ratio Through Dual Regimes: An Evidence from Indian Perspective
This investigation applies a VAR and an ARDL model to estimate the sacrifice ratio in the period of 1968–2018 subject to two regimes in India. The range for the sacrifice ratio mostly lies between [Formula: see text]0.5 and 1 for the period of 1968–2002 while also experiencing sensitive shifts of [Formula: see text]10 and 15. For the period of 2002–2018, the ratio lies between [Formula: see text]3 and 5. Furthermore, the long run estimate of the sacrifice ratio is [Formula: see text]2.35 and the short run is [Formula: see text]0.35. It is concluded that the period of 1968–2002 was more sensitive and more prone to disinflationary costs than gains while the period of 2002–2018 is more resilient and is characterized by both costs and gains to disinflation. The gains from disinflation for the period of 2002–2018 exceed those of the period of 1968–2002. In a comparative perspective, the costs to disinflation for India are much less than the usual range of the sacrifice ratio for advanced economies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy (JICEP) is a peer-reviewed journal that seeks to publish high-quality research papers that explore important dimensions of the global economic system (including trade, finance, investment and labor flows). JICEP is particularly interested in potentially influential research that is analytical or empirical but with heavy emphasis on international dimensions of economics, business and related public policy. Papers must aim to be thought-provoking and combine rigor with readability so as to be of interest to both researchers as well as policymakers. JICEP is not region-specific and especially welcomes research exploring the growing economic interdependence between countries and regions.
期刊最新文献
Income Redistributive Propensities of Self-Employment, ICT and Remittances: Panel Quantile Regression with Nonadditive Fixed Effects Perspective Predicting Business Bankruptcy in Colombian SMEs: A Machine Learning Approach Political Affiliate Clustering with Machine Learning in Vietnam Stock Exchange Market Carbon Emissions and Its Relationship with Foreign Trade Openness and Foreign Direct Investment Role of Human Capital Accumulation in Reducing Poverty and Land Degradation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1