{"title":"亚欧移民体系中的临时移民和不平等","authors":"Mustafa Aksakal, Kerstin Schmidt","doi":"10.1177/0117196820968293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Temporary migration (TM) has always been central in the global history of migration (Oltmer, 2016). In the 20th century, after the Second World War, the most common formof TM tookplace in the context of bilateralworker programs, such as the Bracero program between the United States and Mexico (Driscoll, 1999), the guest worker programs in Europe (Castles andKosack, 1973), or in the temporary recruitment of migrant workers, mostly from Asia, by the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries (Battistella, 2015). While the guest worker schemes have been abandoned in Europe during the 1970s, which consequently led to a gradual decline of temporary labor movements, it expanded and continues to dominate population movements in the GCC and Asia. In comparison to these migration contexts, movements in the AsianEuropean system were, with few exceptions (e.g. migration from India and Pakistan to the UK), less significant and might have received, therefore, only modest research attention. The volumes edited by Pitk€anen et al. (2017, 2019), which compiled diverse studies on the two-way migration processes between Asia and Europe, are a notable exception. Some other studies have probed TM of specific migrant categories in the Asia-Europe migration system: European expatriates in China (Cai and Su, 2020), mobile academics returning to China (Wang, 2020), international students moving from Asia to Europe (Aksakal et al., 2019) and from Europe to Asia (Baas, 2019), or Thai berry-pickers working seasonally in Sweden and Finland (Niyomsilpa et al., 2017), have been scrutinized. Despite these efforts to understand the reasons for and the outcomes of TM, the question remains: what exactly is temporary migration?","PeriodicalId":46248,"journal":{"name":"Asian and Pacific Migration Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"319 - 332"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporary migration and inequalities in the Asian–European migration system\",\"authors\":\"Mustafa Aksakal, Kerstin Schmidt\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0117196820968293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Temporary migration (TM) has always been central in the global history of migration (Oltmer, 2016). In the 20th century, after the Second World War, the most common formof TM tookplace in the context of bilateralworker programs, such as the Bracero program between the United States and Mexico (Driscoll, 1999), the guest worker programs in Europe (Castles andKosack, 1973), or in the temporary recruitment of migrant workers, mostly from Asia, by the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries (Battistella, 2015). While the guest worker schemes have been abandoned in Europe during the 1970s, which consequently led to a gradual decline of temporary labor movements, it expanded and continues to dominate population movements in the GCC and Asia. In comparison to these migration contexts, movements in the AsianEuropean system were, with few exceptions (e.g. migration from India and Pakistan to the UK), less significant and might have received, therefore, only modest research attention. The volumes edited by Pitk€anen et al. (2017, 2019), which compiled diverse studies on the two-way migration processes between Asia and Europe, are a notable exception. Some other studies have probed TM of specific migrant categories in the Asia-Europe migration system: European expatriates in China (Cai and Su, 2020), mobile academics returning to China (Wang, 2020), international students moving from Asia to Europe (Aksakal et al., 2019) and from Europe to Asia (Baas, 2019), or Thai berry-pickers working seasonally in Sweden and Finland (Niyomsilpa et al., 2017), have been scrutinized. Despite these efforts to understand the reasons for and the outcomes of TM, the question remains: what exactly is temporary migration?\",\"PeriodicalId\":46248,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian and Pacific Migration Journal\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"319 - 332\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian and Pacific Migration Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0117196820968293\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DEMOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian and Pacific Migration Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0117196820968293","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
临时移民(TM)一直是全球移民史的中心(Oltmer, 2016)。在20世纪,第二次世界大战后,最常见的跨国劳工形式发生在双边劳工计划的背景下,如美国和墨西哥之间的Bracero计划(Driscoll, 1999),欧洲的客工计划(Castles and kosack, 1973),或海湾合作委员会(GCC)国家临时招募移民工人(主要来自亚洲)(Battistella, 2015)。虽然在1970年代欧洲已放弃客工计划,因此导致临时劳工流动逐渐减少,但它扩大并继续在海湾合作委员会和亚洲的人口流动中占主导地位。与这些移民背景相比,除了少数例外(例如,从印度和巴基斯坦到英国的移民),亚欧体系中的移民运动不那么重要,因此可能只得到很少的研究关注。Pitk€anen等人(2017,2019)编辑的卷汇编了关于亚洲和欧洲之间双向移民过程的各种研究,这是一个明显的例外。其他一些研究也探讨了亚欧移民系统中特定移民类别的TM:在中国的欧洲外籍人士(Cai和Su, 2020),返回中国的流动学者(Wang, 2020),从亚洲到欧洲的国际学生(Aksakal等人,2019)和从欧洲到亚洲的国际学生(Baas, 2019),或在瑞典和芬兰季节性工作的泰国浆果采摘者(Niyomsilpa等人,2017)。尽管这些努力都是为了理解临时移民的原因和结果,但问题仍然存在:究竟什么是临时移民?
Temporary migration and inequalities in the Asian–European migration system
Temporary migration (TM) has always been central in the global history of migration (Oltmer, 2016). In the 20th century, after the Second World War, the most common formof TM tookplace in the context of bilateralworker programs, such as the Bracero program between the United States and Mexico (Driscoll, 1999), the guest worker programs in Europe (Castles andKosack, 1973), or in the temporary recruitment of migrant workers, mostly from Asia, by the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries (Battistella, 2015). While the guest worker schemes have been abandoned in Europe during the 1970s, which consequently led to a gradual decline of temporary labor movements, it expanded and continues to dominate population movements in the GCC and Asia. In comparison to these migration contexts, movements in the AsianEuropean system were, with few exceptions (e.g. migration from India and Pakistan to the UK), less significant and might have received, therefore, only modest research attention. The volumes edited by Pitk€anen et al. (2017, 2019), which compiled diverse studies on the two-way migration processes between Asia and Europe, are a notable exception. Some other studies have probed TM of specific migrant categories in the Asia-Europe migration system: European expatriates in China (Cai and Su, 2020), mobile academics returning to China (Wang, 2020), international students moving from Asia to Europe (Aksakal et al., 2019) and from Europe to Asia (Baas, 2019), or Thai berry-pickers working seasonally in Sweden and Finland (Niyomsilpa et al., 2017), have been scrutinized. Despite these efforts to understand the reasons for and the outcomes of TM, the question remains: what exactly is temporary migration?
期刊介绍:
The Asian and Pacific Migration Journal (APMJ) was launched in 1992, borne out of the conviction of the need to have a migration journal originating from the region that would provide a regional perspective of migration. Users will be able to read any article published from 1992 to 2006, to search all the articles by words or keywords and to copy or print partially or fully any article.