D. Rokka, S. Paudel, P. Kayastha, Saroj Chhetry, Sudil Paudyal, S. Suwal
{"title":"计算机断层扫描肾脏尺寸的规范评估","authors":"D. Rokka, S. Paudel, P. Kayastha, Saroj Chhetry, Sudil Paudyal, S. Suwal","doi":"10.4103/ijhas.IJHAS_78_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: The values measured by ultrasound for normal renal dimensions in adults are well established, but not much is known about the normal renal size of Nepalese subjects from computed tomography (CT). This study aimed to establish normal CT values for kidney dimensions from patients undergoing contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) abdomen examination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study carried out in patients undergoing CECT scan with different clinical history excluding abnormalities with the urinary system. The study consisted of the measurement of 212 bilateral kidneys in 106 adults. The kidney length (KL) from pole to pole, kidney width (KW), and cortical widths (CW) at the upper, middle, and lower pole were measured. For measuring length, axes were adjusted for each kidney in double oblique sagittal planes, for the width of kidney and cortex in double oblique coronal planes using a 3D-software available in the scanner (Neosoft). Analyses for normal distribution, t-tests, and correlation were performed using SPSS version 20 (IBM, USA). RESULTS: KL was 95.52 ± 8.91 mm for the right kidney (RK), and 98.22 ± 8.85 mm for the left kidney (LK). CW at the upper, middle, and lower poles on RK was 5.33 ± 0.97 mm, 5.29 ± 0.97, and 5.03 ± 0.88 mm, whereas on the LK was 5.30 ± 0.94 mm, 5.19 ± 0.97, 5.03 ± 0.96 mm, respectively. The KW was 49.15 ± 5.76 mm and 49.11 ± 5.52 mm on RK and LK, respectively. The most significant independent factors for KL and KW were age, body surface area (BSA), gender, height, and weight and were found to be statistically significant (P< 0.05 each). CONCLUSIONS: We established the normal references of various renal measurements which provide the radiologists and the referring clinicians an insight about the normal range of different renal parameters. Since there are several influencing factors on kidney size, the assessment should be made individually. The major influencing factors found are BSA, height, gender, age, and weight.","PeriodicalId":54094,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health and Allied Sciences","volume":"7 1","pages":"222 - 226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Normative assessment of renal dimensions from computed tomography\",\"authors\":\"D. Rokka, S. Paudel, P. Kayastha, Saroj Chhetry, Sudil Paudyal, S. Suwal\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijhas.IJHAS_78_20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: The values measured by ultrasound for normal renal dimensions in adults are well established, but not much is known about the normal renal size of Nepalese subjects from computed tomography (CT). This study aimed to establish normal CT values for kidney dimensions from patients undergoing contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) abdomen examination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study carried out in patients undergoing CECT scan with different clinical history excluding abnormalities with the urinary system. The study consisted of the measurement of 212 bilateral kidneys in 106 adults. The kidney length (KL) from pole to pole, kidney width (KW), and cortical widths (CW) at the upper, middle, and lower pole were measured. For measuring length, axes were adjusted for each kidney in double oblique sagittal planes, for the width of kidney and cortex in double oblique coronal planes using a 3D-software available in the scanner (Neosoft). Analyses for normal distribution, t-tests, and correlation were performed using SPSS version 20 (IBM, USA). RESULTS: KL was 95.52 ± 8.91 mm for the right kidney (RK), and 98.22 ± 8.85 mm for the left kidney (LK). CW at the upper, middle, and lower poles on RK was 5.33 ± 0.97 mm, 5.29 ± 0.97, and 5.03 ± 0.88 mm, whereas on the LK was 5.30 ± 0.94 mm, 5.19 ± 0.97, 5.03 ± 0.96 mm, respectively. The KW was 49.15 ± 5.76 mm and 49.11 ± 5.52 mm on RK and LK, respectively. The most significant independent factors for KL and KW were age, body surface area (BSA), gender, height, and weight and were found to be statistically significant (P< 0.05 each). CONCLUSIONS: We established the normal references of various renal measurements which provide the radiologists and the referring clinicians an insight about the normal range of different renal parameters. Since there are several influencing factors on kidney size, the assessment should be made individually. The major influencing factors found are BSA, height, gender, age, and weight.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Health and Allied Sciences\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"222 - 226\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Health and Allied Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijhas.IJHAS_78_20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health and Allied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijhas.IJHAS_78_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:通过超声测量成人正常肾脏尺寸的数值已经很好地确立了,但是通过计算机断层扫描(CT)对尼泊尔受试者的正常肾脏尺寸知之甚少。本研究的目的是建立正常的CT值肾脏尺寸的患者进行对比增强CT (CECT)腹部检查。材料和方法:这是一项横断面研究,在接受CECT扫描的患者中进行,他们有不同的临床病史,排除了泌尿系统的异常。该研究测量了106名成人的212个双侧肾脏。测量上、中、下三极肾长度(KL)、肾宽度(KW)和皮质宽度(CW)。为了测量长度,在双斜矢状面上调整每个肾脏的轴线,在双斜冠状面上调整肾脏和皮质的宽度,使用扫描仪中可用的3d软件(Neosoft)。使用SPSS version 20 (IBM, USA)进行正态分布、t检验和相关性分析。结果:右肾KL (RK)为95.52±8.91 mm,左肾(LK)为98.22±8.85 mm。RK上、中、下极连续波分别为5.33±0.97 mm、5.29±0.97 mm和5.03±0.88 mm, LK上、中、下极连续波分别为5.30±0.94 mm、5.19±0.97、5.03±0.96 mm。RK和LK的KW分别为49.15±5.76 mm和49.11±5.52 mm。年龄、体表面积(BSA)、性别、身高、体重是影响KL和KW最显著的独立因素,差异均有统计学意义(P< 0.05)。结论:我们建立了各种肾脏指标的正常参考值,为放射科医生和临床医生了解不同肾脏参数的正常范围提供了依据。由于肾脏大小有多种影响因素,因此应单独进行评估。发现的主要影响因素是BSA、身高、性别、年龄和体重。
Normative assessment of renal dimensions from computed tomography
BACKGROUND: The values measured by ultrasound for normal renal dimensions in adults are well established, but not much is known about the normal renal size of Nepalese subjects from computed tomography (CT). This study aimed to establish normal CT values for kidney dimensions from patients undergoing contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) abdomen examination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study carried out in patients undergoing CECT scan with different clinical history excluding abnormalities with the urinary system. The study consisted of the measurement of 212 bilateral kidneys in 106 adults. The kidney length (KL) from pole to pole, kidney width (KW), and cortical widths (CW) at the upper, middle, and lower pole were measured. For measuring length, axes were adjusted for each kidney in double oblique sagittal planes, for the width of kidney and cortex in double oblique coronal planes using a 3D-software available in the scanner (Neosoft). Analyses for normal distribution, t-tests, and correlation were performed using SPSS version 20 (IBM, USA). RESULTS: KL was 95.52 ± 8.91 mm for the right kidney (RK), and 98.22 ± 8.85 mm for the left kidney (LK). CW at the upper, middle, and lower poles on RK was 5.33 ± 0.97 mm, 5.29 ± 0.97, and 5.03 ± 0.88 mm, whereas on the LK was 5.30 ± 0.94 mm, 5.19 ± 0.97, 5.03 ± 0.96 mm, respectively. The KW was 49.15 ± 5.76 mm and 49.11 ± 5.52 mm on RK and LK, respectively. The most significant independent factors for KL and KW were age, body surface area (BSA), gender, height, and weight and were found to be statistically significant (P< 0.05 each). CONCLUSIONS: We established the normal references of various renal measurements which provide the radiologists and the referring clinicians an insight about the normal range of different renal parameters. Since there are several influencing factors on kidney size, the assessment should be made individually. The major influencing factors found are BSA, height, gender, age, and weight.