听力正常者与人工耳蜗使用者音乐感觉测验的组成及比较研究

Q3 Medicine Audiology and Speech Research Pub Date : 2021-07-31 DOI:10.21848/asr.210016
Eunsung Lee, Yerim Shin, S. Jo, Jinsook Kim
{"title":"听力正常者与人工耳蜗使用者音乐感觉测验的组成及比较研究","authors":"Eunsung Lee, Yerim Shin, S. Jo, Jinsook Kim","doi":"10.21848/asr.210016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The aim of this study was to compose the test for music perception and analyze the characteristic of cochlear implant users’ music perception.Methods: The test was made up with the pitch, melody, and timbre factors, using three low and high frequencies, six music genres, and four types of musical instruments correspondingly. The tests were conducted to 10 normal-hearing (NH) young adults and 10 young cochlear-implant (CI) users.Results: All the music perception tests showed significant differences between NH and CI group [F(1, 4) = 0.018, p = 0.019]. In the pitch test, CI group showed significantly lower correction rate(51.3%) than NH group (82.7%) did with higher correction rates in low frequencies. In the melody test, CI group showed significantly lower correction rate (29.7%) than NH group (95.8%) did with the highest performance in folk songs (51.7%). In the timbre test, CI group showed significantly reduced performance (22.5%) than NH group (65.8%) did. For both CI and NH groups, the pitched percussion showed the highest scores (45% and 100%) while the woodwind showed the lowest scores (13.3% and 48.3%).Conclusion: Out of three tests, CI group showed better performance in pitch perception than melody and timber perception. CI group showed better performances in low pitch sounds, melodies of familiar genre, and sound of pitched percussion instruments’ timber showing complicated music perception ability. To enhance the music perception ability for CI users by aural rehabilitation, more specified and systematic music perception test material should be developed.","PeriodicalId":36841,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Speech Research","volume":"57 34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Study for Composition and Comparison of the Music Perception Tests for Normal Hearing and Cochlear Implant Users\",\"authors\":\"Eunsung Lee, Yerim Shin, S. Jo, Jinsook Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.21848/asr.210016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The aim of this study was to compose the test for music perception and analyze the characteristic of cochlear implant users’ music perception.Methods: The test was made up with the pitch, melody, and timbre factors, using three low and high frequencies, six music genres, and four types of musical instruments correspondingly. The tests were conducted to 10 normal-hearing (NH) young adults and 10 young cochlear-implant (CI) users.Results: All the music perception tests showed significant differences between NH and CI group [F(1, 4) = 0.018, p = 0.019]. In the pitch test, CI group showed significantly lower correction rate(51.3%) than NH group (82.7%) did with higher correction rates in low frequencies. In the melody test, CI group showed significantly lower correction rate (29.7%) than NH group (95.8%) did with the highest performance in folk songs (51.7%). In the timbre test, CI group showed significantly reduced performance (22.5%) than NH group (65.8%) did. For both CI and NH groups, the pitched percussion showed the highest scores (45% and 100%) while the woodwind showed the lowest scores (13.3% and 48.3%).Conclusion: Out of three tests, CI group showed better performance in pitch perception than melody and timber perception. CI group showed better performances in low pitch sounds, melodies of familiar genre, and sound of pitched percussion instruments’ timber showing complicated music perception ability. To enhance the music perception ability for CI users by aural rehabilitation, more specified and systematic music perception test material should be developed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Audiology and Speech Research\",\"volume\":\"57 34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Audiology and Speech Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21848/asr.210016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology and Speech Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21848/asr.210016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:编制人工耳蜗使用者音乐感知测试,分析其音乐感知特征。方法:测试由音高、旋律、音色三个因素组成,分别使用三个低、高频、六种音乐类型、四种乐器。对10名听力正常(NH)的年轻人和10名年轻的人工耳蜗使用者进行了测试。结果:NH组与CI组的所有乐感测试均有显著差异[F(1,4) = 0.018, p = 0.019]。在音高测试中,CI组的校正率(51.3%)明显低于NH组(82.7%),但低频校正率较高。在旋律测试中,CI组的正确率(29.7%)显著低于NH组(95.8%),在民谣中表现最高(51.7%)。在音色测试中,CI组的表现(22.5%)明显低于NH组(65.8%)。在CI组和NH组中,有调打击乐器的得分最高(45%和100%),木管乐器的得分最低(13.3%和48.3%)。结论:在三个测试中,CI组在音高感知上的表现优于旋律感知和木材感知。CI组在低音、熟悉类型的旋律、高音调打击乐器的音色上表现较好,表现出复杂的音乐感知能力。为了通过听觉康复提高CI使用者的音乐感知能力,需要开发更具体、更系统的音乐感知测试材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Study for Composition and Comparison of the Music Perception Tests for Normal Hearing and Cochlear Implant Users
Purpose: The aim of this study was to compose the test for music perception and analyze the characteristic of cochlear implant users’ music perception.Methods: The test was made up with the pitch, melody, and timbre factors, using three low and high frequencies, six music genres, and four types of musical instruments correspondingly. The tests were conducted to 10 normal-hearing (NH) young adults and 10 young cochlear-implant (CI) users.Results: All the music perception tests showed significant differences between NH and CI group [F(1, 4) = 0.018, p = 0.019]. In the pitch test, CI group showed significantly lower correction rate(51.3%) than NH group (82.7%) did with higher correction rates in low frequencies. In the melody test, CI group showed significantly lower correction rate (29.7%) than NH group (95.8%) did with the highest performance in folk songs (51.7%). In the timbre test, CI group showed significantly reduced performance (22.5%) than NH group (65.8%) did. For both CI and NH groups, the pitched percussion showed the highest scores (45% and 100%) while the woodwind showed the lowest scores (13.3% and 48.3%).Conclusion: Out of three tests, CI group showed better performance in pitch perception than melody and timber perception. CI group showed better performances in low pitch sounds, melodies of familiar genre, and sound of pitched percussion instruments’ timber showing complicated music perception ability. To enhance the music perception ability for CI users by aural rehabilitation, more specified and systematic music perception test material should be developed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Audiology and Speech Research
Audiology and Speech Research Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Research on Effective Methodology for Hearing Impairment Rehabilitation; Based on a Diary Study for Elderly OnlineAuditory Training Self-Reported Hearing Difficulties and Hearing Aid Uptake Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire in Cochlear Implant Users Research Trends According to the Speech Production Mechanism of Patients with Dysarthria Caused by Acute Brain Injury in Korea The Necessity for Auditory Training with Idiomatic Expressions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1