英国与阿联酋国际私法中的电子合同与侵权

Q4 Social Sciences International Journal of Private Law Pub Date : 2017-10-16 DOI:10.1504/IJPL.2017.10008269
A. Nawafleh
{"title":"英国与阿联酋国际私法中的电子合同与侵权","authors":"A. Nawafleh","doi":"10.1504/IJPL.2017.10008269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the current legislation on private international law in the UK and the UAE in relation to electronic contracts and torts. It highlights issues responsible for deepening the uncertainty and confusion surrounding contracts and torts performed by electronic means - issues that remain unaddressed in UAE legislation. In particular, the paper addresses the absence of adequate provision for choice of law and jurisdiction in the environment of electronic consumer contract and torts. The UAE could address these issues by learning from the experience of the UK when making reforms and instigating future legislation. The paper concludes that, with regard to electronic consumer contracts, the UK provides superior legislation to that of the UAE.","PeriodicalId":39023,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Private Law","volume":"31 1","pages":"299"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electronic contracts and torts in the UK and the UAE private international law\",\"authors\":\"A. Nawafleh\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJPL.2017.10008269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper explores the current legislation on private international law in the UK and the UAE in relation to electronic contracts and torts. It highlights issues responsible for deepening the uncertainty and confusion surrounding contracts and torts performed by electronic means - issues that remain unaddressed in UAE legislation. In particular, the paper addresses the absence of adequate provision for choice of law and jurisdiction in the environment of electronic consumer contract and torts. The UAE could address these issues by learning from the experience of the UK when making reforms and instigating future legislation. The paper concludes that, with regard to electronic consumer contracts, the UK provides superior legislation to that of the UAE.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Private Law\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"299\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Private Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPL.2017.10008269\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Private Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPL.2017.10008269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了英国和阿联酋在电子合同和侵权方面的现行国际私法立法。它强调了一些问题,这些问题加深了围绕电子方式执行的合同和侵权行为的不确定性和混乱,这些问题在阿联酋的立法中仍未得到解决。特别地,本文讨论了在电子消费者合同和侵权环境下法律选择和管辖权缺乏充分的规定。阿联酋可以通过在进行改革和推动未来立法时学习英国的经验来解决这些问题。本文的结论是,在电子消费者合同方面,英国提供了优于阿联酋的立法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Electronic contracts and torts in the UK and the UAE private international law
This paper explores the current legislation on private international law in the UK and the UAE in relation to electronic contracts and torts. It highlights issues responsible for deepening the uncertainty and confusion surrounding contracts and torts performed by electronic means - issues that remain unaddressed in UAE legislation. In particular, the paper addresses the absence of adequate provision for choice of law and jurisdiction in the environment of electronic consumer contract and torts. The UAE could address these issues by learning from the experience of the UK when making reforms and instigating future legislation. The paper concludes that, with regard to electronic consumer contracts, the UK provides superior legislation to that of the UAE.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
The evolution of the non-oral modification clause Legal regulation of migration policy in EU countries: current challenges The application of the concept of consideration to smart contracts on a blockchain. The propriety of mandatory arbitration in Nigeria vis-à-vis the doctrine of voluntariness: the imperativeness of charting a new course The evolution of the non-oral modification clause
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1