{"title":"纪律与开发:作曲家是优秀的专业人士","authors":"James H. Sledd","doi":"10.14288/WORKPLACE.V0I7.184511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Why was the emergence of \"composition studies,\" the achievement of \"disciplinarity\" by a fortunate minority of compositionists, neatly paralleled by the deepening exploitation of composition's most numerous teachers, the teaching assistants, part-timers, and other contingent workers? Why did a few directors \"get grants, rank, and tenure\" while growing numbers of classroom teachers remained overworked, underpaid, and insecure? Why did the conventional ambition of good professionals end in bossdom?","PeriodicalId":42624,"journal":{"name":"Workplace-A Journal for Academic Labor","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disciplinarity and Exploitation: Compositionists as Good Professionals\",\"authors\":\"James H. Sledd\",\"doi\":\"10.14288/WORKPLACE.V0I7.184511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Why was the emergence of \\\"composition studies,\\\" the achievement of \\\"disciplinarity\\\" by a fortunate minority of compositionists, neatly paralleled by the deepening exploitation of composition's most numerous teachers, the teaching assistants, part-timers, and other contingent workers? Why did a few directors \\\"get grants, rank, and tenure\\\" while growing numbers of classroom teachers remained overworked, underpaid, and insecure? Why did the conventional ambition of good professionals end in bossdom?\",\"PeriodicalId\":42624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Workplace-A Journal for Academic Labor\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Workplace-A Journal for Academic Labor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14288/WORKPLACE.V0I7.184511\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workplace-A Journal for Academic Labor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14288/WORKPLACE.V0I7.184511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
Disciplinarity and Exploitation: Compositionists as Good Professionals
Why was the emergence of "composition studies," the achievement of "disciplinarity" by a fortunate minority of compositionists, neatly paralleled by the deepening exploitation of composition's most numerous teachers, the teaching assistants, part-timers, and other contingent workers? Why did a few directors "get grants, rank, and tenure" while growing numbers of classroom teachers remained overworked, underpaid, and insecure? Why did the conventional ambition of good professionals end in bossdom?