{"title":"【氰基丙烯酸酯粘接剂治疗静脉曲张的不良事件及并发症】。","authors":"O Shirinbek, G V Mnatsakanyan, S N Odinokova","doi":"10.33029/1027-6661-2023-29-1-59-66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cyanoacrylate adhesive closure is currently considered to be an alternative to thermal ablation of varicose veins. It emerged as a natural step towards minimally invasive surgical treatment of incompetent saphenous veins.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess the safety of cyanoacrylate adhesive closure in treatment of patients with varicose veins based on two-year experience.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Between July 2019 and July 2021, cyanoacrylate adhesive closure was performed in a total of 457 patients (634 limbs and 725 venous trunks). The inclusion criteria were as follows: CEAP clinical classes C2-C6, junctional and truncal valve incompetence with reflux >0.5 sec, saphenous vein diameter > 6 mm, presence of varicosities. Cyanoacrylate adhesive closure was carried out according to the standard VenaSeal protocol. In 76.2% of cases, the procedure was performed selectively without tributary treatment. Duplex ultrasound follow-up examinations were carried out on POD 3, as well as at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months following the procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Partial recanalization occurred in 4 (0.8%) cases between 6 and 15 months post-procedure. Glue migration and propagation into the deep vein was detected in 7 (1.5%) patients and asymptomatic sural vein thrombosis was found in 2 (0.4%) cases. Phlebitis-like skin reaction developed in 50 (11%) cases, superficial thrombophlebitis - in 20 (4.3%) patients. In 6 (1.3%) cases, the procedure was complicated by soft tissue foreign body granuloma. There were no cases of either pulmonary embolism or peripheral neuropathy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The procedure of cyanoacrylate adhesive closure proved highly effective and safe in treating patients with superficial venous insufficiency and was associated with minimal incidence of adverse events during the two-year follow-up. Further studies are needed to assess the long-term safety of the method.</p>","PeriodicalId":7821,"journal":{"name":"Angiologiia i sosudistaia khirurgiia = Angiology and vascular surgery","volume":"162 1","pages":"59-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Adverse events and complications following cyanoacrylate adhesive closure of varicose veins].\",\"authors\":\"O Shirinbek, G V Mnatsakanyan, S N Odinokova\",\"doi\":\"10.33029/1027-6661-2023-29-1-59-66\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cyanoacrylate adhesive closure is currently considered to be an alternative to thermal ablation of varicose veins. It emerged as a natural step towards minimally invasive surgical treatment of incompetent saphenous veins.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess the safety of cyanoacrylate adhesive closure in treatment of patients with varicose veins based on two-year experience.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Between July 2019 and July 2021, cyanoacrylate adhesive closure was performed in a total of 457 patients (634 limbs and 725 venous trunks). The inclusion criteria were as follows: CEAP clinical classes C2-C6, junctional and truncal valve incompetence with reflux >0.5 sec, saphenous vein diameter > 6 mm, presence of varicosities. Cyanoacrylate adhesive closure was carried out according to the standard VenaSeal protocol. In 76.2% of cases, the procedure was performed selectively without tributary treatment. Duplex ultrasound follow-up examinations were carried out on POD 3, as well as at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months following the procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Partial recanalization occurred in 4 (0.8%) cases between 6 and 15 months post-procedure. Glue migration and propagation into the deep vein was detected in 7 (1.5%) patients and asymptomatic sural vein thrombosis was found in 2 (0.4%) cases. Phlebitis-like skin reaction developed in 50 (11%) cases, superficial thrombophlebitis - in 20 (4.3%) patients. In 6 (1.3%) cases, the procedure was complicated by soft tissue foreign body granuloma. There were no cases of either pulmonary embolism or peripheral neuropathy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The procedure of cyanoacrylate adhesive closure proved highly effective and safe in treating patients with superficial venous insufficiency and was associated with minimal incidence of adverse events during the two-year follow-up. Further studies are needed to assess the long-term safety of the method.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7821,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Angiologiia i sosudistaia khirurgiia = Angiology and vascular surgery\",\"volume\":\"162 1\",\"pages\":\"59-66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Angiologiia i sosudistaia khirurgiia = Angiology and vascular surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33029/1027-6661-2023-29-1-59-66\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Angiologiia i sosudistaia khirurgiia = Angiology and vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33029/1027-6661-2023-29-1-59-66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Adverse events and complications following cyanoacrylate adhesive closure of varicose veins].
Background: Cyanoacrylate adhesive closure is currently considered to be an alternative to thermal ablation of varicose veins. It emerged as a natural step towards minimally invasive surgical treatment of incompetent saphenous veins.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the safety of cyanoacrylate adhesive closure in treatment of patients with varicose veins based on two-year experience.
Patients and methods: Between July 2019 and July 2021, cyanoacrylate adhesive closure was performed in a total of 457 patients (634 limbs and 725 venous trunks). The inclusion criteria were as follows: CEAP clinical classes C2-C6, junctional and truncal valve incompetence with reflux >0.5 sec, saphenous vein diameter > 6 mm, presence of varicosities. Cyanoacrylate adhesive closure was carried out according to the standard VenaSeal protocol. In 76.2% of cases, the procedure was performed selectively without tributary treatment. Duplex ultrasound follow-up examinations were carried out on POD 3, as well as at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months following the procedure.
Results: Partial recanalization occurred in 4 (0.8%) cases between 6 and 15 months post-procedure. Glue migration and propagation into the deep vein was detected in 7 (1.5%) patients and asymptomatic sural vein thrombosis was found in 2 (0.4%) cases. Phlebitis-like skin reaction developed in 50 (11%) cases, superficial thrombophlebitis - in 20 (4.3%) patients. In 6 (1.3%) cases, the procedure was complicated by soft tissue foreign body granuloma. There were no cases of either pulmonary embolism or peripheral neuropathy.
Conclusion: The procedure of cyanoacrylate adhesive closure proved highly effective and safe in treating patients with superficial venous insufficiency and was associated with minimal incidence of adverse events during the two-year follow-up. Further studies are needed to assess the long-term safety of the method.