{"title":"美国新建单户住宅销售量下降的原因分析","authors":"A. Çetin, J. Kole","doi":"10.14706/JECOSS11317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The new privately owned one-family house sold (C25) is recognized as great indicator for \neconomy. The monthly data in February 2011 was 250,000 houses sold. Compared to five \nyears ago, 1,061,000 in 2006 were decreased by 76%. What are the causes to the dramatic \ndecline of number of C25? The purpose of this paper is to analyze factors that determine the \ndecline of number of C25 in US. Therefore, in this study, dependent variable is the new \nprivately owned one-family house sold. Independent variables include 30 years mortgage rate, \nreal personal income, unemployment rate, population, and house price index. The results \nindicate when the interest rate increases 1%, the number of new privately owned one-family \nhouses sold decreases by 20 thousand. When the unemployment rate increases 1%, the number of new privately owned one-family houses sold decreases 81 thousand, holding all \nother variables constant. We thought when price goes up the demand should go down. But it \ndoesn’t fit in this study. Income and house sold have positive relationship but it’s not \nsignificant. It shows that real personal income and unemployment have a high correlation. For \nthe population variable, the coefficient is a negative number. Even though the p-value \nindicates that this result is not significant, we still couldn’t figure out the cause of this \nnegative relation. The result of monthly dummy test indicates that none of the months has \nsignificant effects. However, from March to July the slopes of the months have positive or \nlower negative effects. Consequently, it’s impossible to determine all the causes to the \nnumber of new house sold since many factors are interrelated. However, through our series of \nstatistical tests, we could be able to conclude that current mortgage rate is significant at 1% \nlevel; mortgage rate at lag one time period is significant at 5% level; both real personal \nincomes at lag one time period and unemployment rate at lag two time period are significant \nat 10% level. \nKeywords: house sold, mortgage rate, income level, unemployment rate, population increases, \nhouse price index","PeriodicalId":52427,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies","volume":"134 1","pages":"185-199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Factors Which Caused the Decline in the Amount of the Newly One Family Houses Sold in US\",\"authors\":\"A. Çetin, J. Kole\",\"doi\":\"10.14706/JECOSS11317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The new privately owned one-family house sold (C25) is recognized as great indicator for \\neconomy. The monthly data in February 2011 was 250,000 houses sold. Compared to five \\nyears ago, 1,061,000 in 2006 were decreased by 76%. What are the causes to the dramatic \\ndecline of number of C25? The purpose of this paper is to analyze factors that determine the \\ndecline of number of C25 in US. Therefore, in this study, dependent variable is the new \\nprivately owned one-family house sold. Independent variables include 30 years mortgage rate, \\nreal personal income, unemployment rate, population, and house price index. The results \\nindicate when the interest rate increases 1%, the number of new privately owned one-family \\nhouses sold decreases by 20 thousand. When the unemployment rate increases 1%, the number of new privately owned one-family houses sold decreases 81 thousand, holding all \\nother variables constant. We thought when price goes up the demand should go down. But it \\ndoesn’t fit in this study. Income and house sold have positive relationship but it’s not \\nsignificant. It shows that real personal income and unemployment have a high correlation. For \\nthe population variable, the coefficient is a negative number. Even though the p-value \\nindicates that this result is not significant, we still couldn’t figure out the cause of this \\nnegative relation. The result of monthly dummy test indicates that none of the months has \\nsignificant effects. However, from March to July the slopes of the months have positive or \\nlower negative effects. Consequently, it’s impossible to determine all the causes to the \\nnumber of new house sold since many factors are interrelated. However, through our series of \\nstatistical tests, we could be able to conclude that current mortgage rate is significant at 1% \\nlevel; mortgage rate at lag one time period is significant at 5% level; both real personal \\nincomes at lag one time period and unemployment rate at lag two time period are significant \\nat 10% level. \\nKeywords: house sold, mortgage rate, income level, unemployment rate, population increases, \\nhouse price index\",\"PeriodicalId\":52427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies\",\"volume\":\"134 1\",\"pages\":\"185-199\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14706/JECOSS11317\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14706/JECOSS11317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Factors Which Caused the Decline in the Amount of the Newly One Family Houses Sold in US
The new privately owned one-family house sold (C25) is recognized as great indicator for
economy. The monthly data in February 2011 was 250,000 houses sold. Compared to five
years ago, 1,061,000 in 2006 were decreased by 76%. What are the causes to the dramatic
decline of number of C25? The purpose of this paper is to analyze factors that determine the
decline of number of C25 in US. Therefore, in this study, dependent variable is the new
privately owned one-family house sold. Independent variables include 30 years mortgage rate,
real personal income, unemployment rate, population, and house price index. The results
indicate when the interest rate increases 1%, the number of new privately owned one-family
houses sold decreases by 20 thousand. When the unemployment rate increases 1%, the number of new privately owned one-family houses sold decreases 81 thousand, holding all
other variables constant. We thought when price goes up the demand should go down. But it
doesn’t fit in this study. Income and house sold have positive relationship but it’s not
significant. It shows that real personal income and unemployment have a high correlation. For
the population variable, the coefficient is a negative number. Even though the p-value
indicates that this result is not significant, we still couldn’t figure out the cause of this
negative relation. The result of monthly dummy test indicates that none of the months has
significant effects. However, from March to July the slopes of the months have positive or
lower negative effects. Consequently, it’s impossible to determine all the causes to the
number of new house sold since many factors are interrelated. However, through our series of
statistical tests, we could be able to conclude that current mortgage rate is significant at 1%
level; mortgage rate at lag one time period is significant at 5% level; both real personal
incomes at lag one time period and unemployment rate at lag two time period are significant
at 10% level.
Keywords: house sold, mortgage rate, income level, unemployment rate, population increases,
house price index