{"title":"汤普森组基于树的语言复杂性","authors":"J. Taback, Sharif Younes","doi":"10.1515/gcc-2015-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The definition of graph automatic groups by Kharlampovich, Khoussainov and Miasnikov and its extension to 𝒞-graph automatic by Elder and the first author raise the question of whether Thompson's group F is graph automatic. We define a language of normal forms based on the combinatorial “caret types”, which arise when elements of F are considered as pairs of finite rooted binary trees. The language is accepted by a finite state machine with two counters, and forms the basis of a 3-counter graph automatic structure for the group.","PeriodicalId":41862,"journal":{"name":"Groups Complexity Cryptology","volume":"35 1","pages":"135 - 152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tree-based language complexity of Thompson's group F\",\"authors\":\"J. Taback, Sharif Younes\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/gcc-2015-0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The definition of graph automatic groups by Kharlampovich, Khoussainov and Miasnikov and its extension to 𝒞-graph automatic by Elder and the first author raise the question of whether Thompson's group F is graph automatic. We define a language of normal forms based on the combinatorial “caret types”, which arise when elements of F are considered as pairs of finite rooted binary trees. The language is accepted by a finite state machine with two counters, and forms the basis of a 3-counter graph automatic structure for the group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Groups Complexity Cryptology\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"135 - 152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Groups Complexity Cryptology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/gcc-2015-0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Groups Complexity Cryptology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/gcc-2015-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Tree-based language complexity of Thompson's group F
Abstract The definition of graph automatic groups by Kharlampovich, Khoussainov and Miasnikov and its extension to 𝒞-graph automatic by Elder and the first author raise the question of whether Thompson's group F is graph automatic. We define a language of normal forms based on the combinatorial “caret types”, which arise when elements of F are considered as pairs of finite rooted binary trees. The language is accepted by a finite state machine with two counters, and forms the basis of a 3-counter graph automatic structure for the group.