数学解题速度与学生策略的分析:一个混合项目反应理论方法

Chunlian Jiang, Do-Hong Kim, Chuang Wang
{"title":"数学解题速度与学生策略的分析:一个混合项目反应理论方法","authors":"Chunlian Jiang, Do-Hong Kim, Chuang Wang","doi":"10.59863/zhfp5485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study used the mixed item response theory (IRT) model to identify qualitatively distinct subgroups of sixth-grade students with respect to their performance on word problems on speed. A total of 345 Singaporean students and 361 Chinese students took a problem-solving test on speed. The mixed IRT analysis revealed two latent classes — the algebra proficient group and the algebra novice group. The algebra proficient group was more likely to use traditional algebraic and arithmetic strategies to solve the problems, whereas the algebra novice group was more likely to use model drawing, unitary, and guess-and-check strategies, in addition to using traditional arithmetic and algebraic strategies. Findings of the study indicate that a greater variety of problem-solving strategies could be encouraged in upper primary schools to help students make connections among these strategies, in particular, between these strategies and the abstract algebraic strategies, and finally to achieve a successful transition from arithmetic to algebra learning.","PeriodicalId":72586,"journal":{"name":"Chinese/English journal of educational measurement and evaluation","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of a Mathematical Problem-Solving Test on Speed and Students' Strategies: A Mixed Item Response Theory Approach\",\"authors\":\"Chunlian Jiang, Do-Hong Kim, Chuang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.59863/zhfp5485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present study used the mixed item response theory (IRT) model to identify qualitatively distinct subgroups of sixth-grade students with respect to their performance on word problems on speed. A total of 345 Singaporean students and 361 Chinese students took a problem-solving test on speed. The mixed IRT analysis revealed two latent classes — the algebra proficient group and the algebra novice group. The algebra proficient group was more likely to use traditional algebraic and arithmetic strategies to solve the problems, whereas the algebra novice group was more likely to use model drawing, unitary, and guess-and-check strategies, in addition to using traditional arithmetic and algebraic strategies. Findings of the study indicate that a greater variety of problem-solving strategies could be encouraged in upper primary schools to help students make connections among these strategies, in particular, between these strategies and the abstract algebraic strategies, and finally to achieve a successful transition from arithmetic to algebra learning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese/English journal of educational measurement and evaluation\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese/English journal of educational measurement and evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59863/zhfp5485\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese/English journal of educational measurement and evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59863/zhfp5485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用混合项目反应理论(IRT)模型来识别六年级学生在语速问题上的表现。共有345名新加坡学生和361名中国学生参加了速度问题测试。混合IRT分析显示两个潜在类别-代数精通组和代数新手组。代数精通组更倾向于使用传统的代数和算术策略来解决问题,而代数新手组在使用传统的算术和代数策略的同时,更倾向于使用模型绘制、统一和猜测和验证策略。研究结果表明,可以在小学高年级鼓励更多种类的问题解决策略,帮助学生在这些策略之间建立联系,特别是在这些策略与抽象代数策略之间建立联系,最终实现从算术学习到代数学习的成功过渡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of a Mathematical Problem-Solving Test on Speed and Students' Strategies: A Mixed Item Response Theory Approach
The present study used the mixed item response theory (IRT) model to identify qualitatively distinct subgroups of sixth-grade students with respect to their performance on word problems on speed. A total of 345 Singaporean students and 361 Chinese students took a problem-solving test on speed. The mixed IRT analysis revealed two latent classes — the algebra proficient group and the algebra novice group. The algebra proficient group was more likely to use traditional algebraic and arithmetic strategies to solve the problems, whereas the algebra novice group was more likely to use model drawing, unitary, and guess-and-check strategies, in addition to using traditional arithmetic and algebraic strategies. Findings of the study indicate that a greater variety of problem-solving strategies could be encouraged in upper primary schools to help students make connections among these strategies, in particular, between these strategies and the abstract algebraic strategies, and finally to achieve a successful transition from arithmetic to algebra learning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Non-Parametric CD-CAT Item Selection Strategy and Termination Rules Based on Binary Search Algorithm 基于二分搜索算法构建的非参数CD-CAT选题策略及终止规则 An Efficient Non-parametric Item Selection Method for Polytomous Scoring CD-CAT ETS Skills Taxonomy 一种高效的且适用于多级计分CD-CAT非参数选题方法
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1