BBC世界电视新闻:介绍

IF 0.9 2区 艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION Critical Studies in Television Pub Date : 2022-08-23 DOI:10.1177/17496020221121457
H. Andrews
{"title":"BBC世界电视新闻:介绍","authors":"H. Andrews","doi":"10.1177/17496020221121457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When we sent out a call for papers for the BBC at 100 special issues, ‘the BBC in the world’was one of the key themes listed therein. It was striking, on assessing the excellent abstracts that were submitted, that the bulk of these took as their subject matter the BBC’s transnational relationships with its near neighbours, either geographically in Europe, or culturally, in North America. This mirrors a general preponderance in the scholarship on the BBC’s global position, written by Western authors who inevitably approach the subject from a particular point of view. Despite the current efforts in the academy to decolonise our thinking, teaching and research, television studies approaches to the BBC remain dominated by Western perspectives. There is therefore a significant gap in studies of BBC television. We need more studies of the work of the BBC from the perspectives of scholars (and audiences) outside of theWest. The following pieces add to the conversation and begin to address this gap. They are written in the Critical Studies in Television tradition of short, punchy ‘provocations’ that present a viewpoint or snapshot, able to be produced more flexibly and responsively than a full academic article. The authors were invited to write on any topic related to the BBC in the world, but – coincidentally or not – both articles present an assessment of the operations of BBC News in global contexts, and the way these are perceived by audiences in Nigeria and India. The BBC’s position as a global provider of news is complicated by its history of broadcasting overseas, one that Marie Gillespie, AlbanWebb and Gerd Baumann describe as ‘little known and perhaps even less understood’ (2008: 453). The World Service, established in 1932 and variously named ‘Empire’ and ‘Overseas’ services during its history, now broadcasts radio content in 42 languages worldwide. Part-funded by the UK government, with historical variations in the amount of control or oversight of the state, the service operates as a form of ‘soft power’ and can be viewed as ‘paternalistic’ at best (Sambrook, 2022), propagandistic at worst. The BBC’s global television news provision operates as a commercial outfit rather than directly as a public service, but retains the institution’s PSB-associated brand values of high-quality, impartial news provision. Daya Kishan Thussu notes that despite its aims of promoting British interests, these services","PeriodicalId":51917,"journal":{"name":"Critical Studies in Television","volume":"54 1","pages":"382 - 384"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BBC television news in the world: An introduction\",\"authors\":\"H. Andrews\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17496020221121457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When we sent out a call for papers for the BBC at 100 special issues, ‘the BBC in the world’was one of the key themes listed therein. It was striking, on assessing the excellent abstracts that were submitted, that the bulk of these took as their subject matter the BBC’s transnational relationships with its near neighbours, either geographically in Europe, or culturally, in North America. This mirrors a general preponderance in the scholarship on the BBC’s global position, written by Western authors who inevitably approach the subject from a particular point of view. Despite the current efforts in the academy to decolonise our thinking, teaching and research, television studies approaches to the BBC remain dominated by Western perspectives. There is therefore a significant gap in studies of BBC television. We need more studies of the work of the BBC from the perspectives of scholars (and audiences) outside of theWest. The following pieces add to the conversation and begin to address this gap. They are written in the Critical Studies in Television tradition of short, punchy ‘provocations’ that present a viewpoint or snapshot, able to be produced more flexibly and responsively than a full academic article. The authors were invited to write on any topic related to the BBC in the world, but – coincidentally or not – both articles present an assessment of the operations of BBC News in global contexts, and the way these are perceived by audiences in Nigeria and India. The BBC’s position as a global provider of news is complicated by its history of broadcasting overseas, one that Marie Gillespie, AlbanWebb and Gerd Baumann describe as ‘little known and perhaps even less understood’ (2008: 453). The World Service, established in 1932 and variously named ‘Empire’ and ‘Overseas’ services during its history, now broadcasts radio content in 42 languages worldwide. Part-funded by the UK government, with historical variations in the amount of control or oversight of the state, the service operates as a form of ‘soft power’ and can be viewed as ‘paternalistic’ at best (Sambrook, 2022), propagandistic at worst. The BBC’s global television news provision operates as a commercial outfit rather than directly as a public service, but retains the institution’s PSB-associated brand values of high-quality, impartial news provision. Daya Kishan Thussu notes that despite its aims of promoting British interests, these services\",\"PeriodicalId\":51917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Studies in Television\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"382 - 384\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Studies in Television\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17496020221121457\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Studies in Television","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17496020221121457","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当我们在100期特刊上为BBC发出征稿时,“世界上的BBC”是其中列出的关键主题之一。在评估提交的优秀摘要时,令人惊讶的是,其中大部分将BBC与其近邻的跨国关系作为主题,无论是地理上的欧洲,还是文化上的北美。这反映了关于BBC全球地位的学术研究的普遍优势,这些研究都是由西方作者撰写的,他们不可避免地会从一个特定的角度来探讨这个主题。尽管目前学术界正在努力使我们的思想、教学和研究去殖民化,但BBC的电视研究方法仍然被西方观点所主导。因此,对英国广播公司电视节目的研究存在重大差距。我们需要从西方以外的学者(和观众)的角度对BBC的工作进行更多的研究。下面的部分添加到对话中,并开始解决这个差距。它们是按照电视批评研究的传统写成的,简短而有力的“挑衅”呈现了一个观点或快照,能够比一篇完整的学术文章更灵活、更有反应。这两篇文章的作者被邀请就世界上任何与BBC有关的话题进行写作,但无论是否巧合,这两篇文章都对BBC新闻在全球背景下的运作进行了评估,以及尼日利亚和印度观众对BBC新闻的看法。英国广播公司作为全球新闻提供者的地位因其海外广播的历史而变得复杂,Marie Gillespie, AlbanWebb和Gerd Baumann将其描述为“鲜为人知,甚至不太了解”(2008:453)。世界广播成立于1932年,历史上曾被称为“帝国”和“海外”服务,现在在全球以42种语言播放广播内容。该服务由英国政府部分资助,在国家控制或监督的数量上存在历史差异,作为一种“软实力”运作,最好的情况下可以被视为“家长式”(Sambrook, 2022),最坏的情况下可以被视为宣传。BBC的全球电视新闻服务是作为一个商业机构而不是直接作为一项公共服务来运作的,但它保留了该机构与psb相关的高质量、公正的新闻服务的品牌价值。达亚·基尚·苏苏指出,尽管其目的是促进英国的利益,但这些服务
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
BBC television news in the world: An introduction
When we sent out a call for papers for the BBC at 100 special issues, ‘the BBC in the world’was one of the key themes listed therein. It was striking, on assessing the excellent abstracts that were submitted, that the bulk of these took as their subject matter the BBC’s transnational relationships with its near neighbours, either geographically in Europe, or culturally, in North America. This mirrors a general preponderance in the scholarship on the BBC’s global position, written by Western authors who inevitably approach the subject from a particular point of view. Despite the current efforts in the academy to decolonise our thinking, teaching and research, television studies approaches to the BBC remain dominated by Western perspectives. There is therefore a significant gap in studies of BBC television. We need more studies of the work of the BBC from the perspectives of scholars (and audiences) outside of theWest. The following pieces add to the conversation and begin to address this gap. They are written in the Critical Studies in Television tradition of short, punchy ‘provocations’ that present a viewpoint or snapshot, able to be produced more flexibly and responsively than a full academic article. The authors were invited to write on any topic related to the BBC in the world, but – coincidentally or not – both articles present an assessment of the operations of BBC News in global contexts, and the way these are perceived by audiences in Nigeria and India. The BBC’s position as a global provider of news is complicated by its history of broadcasting overseas, one that Marie Gillespie, AlbanWebb and Gerd Baumann describe as ‘little known and perhaps even less understood’ (2008: 453). The World Service, established in 1932 and variously named ‘Empire’ and ‘Overseas’ services during its history, now broadcasts radio content in 42 languages worldwide. Part-funded by the UK government, with historical variations in the amount of control or oversight of the state, the service operates as a form of ‘soft power’ and can be viewed as ‘paternalistic’ at best (Sambrook, 2022), propagandistic at worst. The BBC’s global television news provision operates as a commercial outfit rather than directly as a public service, but retains the institution’s PSB-associated brand values of high-quality, impartial news provision. Daya Kishan Thussu notes that despite its aims of promoting British interests, these services
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Studies in Television
Critical Studies in Television FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
30.00%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Critical Studies in Television publishes articles that draw together divergent disciplines and different ways of thinking, to promote and advance television as a distinct academic discipline. It welcomes contributions on any aspect of television—production studies and institutional histories, audience and reception studies, theoretical approaches, conceptual paradigms and pedagogical questions. It continues to invite analyses of the compositional principles and aesthetics of texts, as well as contextual matters relating to both contemporary and past productions. CST also features book reviews, dossiers and debates. The journal is scholarly but accessible, dedicated to generating new knowledge and fostering a dynamic intellectual platform for television studies.
期刊最新文献
‘I am in Great Pain, Please Help Me’: Nihilism, Humour, and Rick and Morty Victim behaviour and trauma recovery: Representing black British femininity through fantasy in Michaela Coel’s I May Destroy You Exploring Netflix myths: Towards more media industry studies and empirical research in studying video-on-demand Book Review: Audiovisual content for children and adolescents in Scandinavia: Production, distribution, and reception in a multiplatform era Is prompt engineering the future of screenwriting? Views of professional screenwriters and commissioners about the impact of AI technologies on their profession
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1