J.-B. Dubuisson md, C. Chapron md, P. Morice md, M.-C. Vacher-Lavenue md
{"title":"输卵管切除术治疗异位妊娠的组织学结果:344例输卵管妊娠","authors":"J.-B. Dubuisson md, C. Chapron md, P. Morice md, M.-C. Vacher-Lavenue md","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2508.1997.138-gy0546.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To find out if knowledge of the type, location and extent of histological lesions to the tube might influence the choices for surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy (EP).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective clinical study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Department of Gynaecological Surgery, Clinique Universitaire Baudelocque, CHU Cochin Port-Royal, Paris, France.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Subjects</h3>\n \n <p>Histological study of 344 cases of laparoscopic salpingectomy for EP.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The EP was in a proximal location in 14.8% of cases (51 patients) and in a distal location in 85.2% of cases (293 patients). The tube was histologically normal in 17.7% of cases (61 patients). The rate of histologically normal tubes was significantly greater in patients with no past history of tubal problems (28.9%, 22 patients vs. 14.5%, 39 patients; <i>P</i> = 0.0004). In 32.3% of cases (111 patients) tube pathology was bifocal. The rate of bifocal tubal pathologies was significantly greater in cases of proximal EP (45.1%, 23 patients vs. 30%, 88 patients; <i>P</i> = 0.03). Proximal pathology is less often isolated than distal pathology (4.5%, 19 patients, vs. 44.5%, 153 patients).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Laparoscopic surgical treatment needs to be more radical (salpingectomy) when the EP is proximal and when the patient presents a past history of tubal surgery and/or infection.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100599,"journal":{"name":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","volume":"6 6","pages":"341-345"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1365-2508.1997.138-gy0546.x","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Histological results of salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy: a series of 344 tubal pregnancies\",\"authors\":\"J.-B. Dubuisson md, C. Chapron md, P. Morice md, M.-C. Vacher-Lavenue md\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1365-2508.1997.138-gy0546.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To find out if knowledge of the type, location and extent of histological lesions to the tube might influence the choices for surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy (EP).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>Retrospective clinical study.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Setting</h3>\\n \\n <p>Department of Gynaecological Surgery, Clinique Universitaire Baudelocque, CHU Cochin Port-Royal, Paris, France.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Subjects</h3>\\n \\n <p>Histological study of 344 cases of laparoscopic salpingectomy for EP.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The EP was in a proximal location in 14.8% of cases (51 patients) and in a distal location in 85.2% of cases (293 patients). The tube was histologically normal in 17.7% of cases (61 patients). The rate of histologically normal tubes was significantly greater in patients with no past history of tubal problems (28.9%, 22 patients vs. 14.5%, 39 patients; <i>P</i> = 0.0004). In 32.3% of cases (111 patients) tube pathology was bifocal. The rate of bifocal tubal pathologies was significantly greater in cases of proximal EP (45.1%, 23 patients vs. 30%, 88 patients; <i>P</i> = 0.03). Proximal pathology is less often isolated than distal pathology (4.5%, 19 patients, vs. 44.5%, 153 patients).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Laparoscopic surgical treatment needs to be more radical (salpingectomy) when the EP is proximal and when the patient presents a past history of tubal surgery and/or infection.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynaecological Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"6 6\",\"pages\":\"341-345\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1365-2508.1997.138-gy0546.x\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynaecological Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2508.1997.138-gy0546.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2508.1997.138-gy0546.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Histological results of salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy: a series of 344 tubal pregnancies
Objective
To find out if knowledge of the type, location and extent of histological lesions to the tube might influence the choices for surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy (EP).
Design
Retrospective clinical study.
Setting
Department of Gynaecological Surgery, Clinique Universitaire Baudelocque, CHU Cochin Port-Royal, Paris, France.
Subjects
Histological study of 344 cases of laparoscopic salpingectomy for EP.
Results
The EP was in a proximal location in 14.8% of cases (51 patients) and in a distal location in 85.2% of cases (293 patients). The tube was histologically normal in 17.7% of cases (61 patients). The rate of histologically normal tubes was significantly greater in patients with no past history of tubal problems (28.9%, 22 patients vs. 14.5%, 39 patients; P = 0.0004). In 32.3% of cases (111 patients) tube pathology was bifocal. The rate of bifocal tubal pathologies was significantly greater in cases of proximal EP (45.1%, 23 patients vs. 30%, 88 patients; P = 0.03). Proximal pathology is less often isolated than distal pathology (4.5%, 19 patients, vs. 44.5%, 153 patients).
Conclusions
Laparoscopic surgical treatment needs to be more radical (salpingectomy) when the EP is proximal and when the patient presents a past history of tubal surgery and/or infection.