颈动脉重建术后的脑出血

Conrado J. Estol MD, PhD , Carlos S. Kase MD
{"title":"颈动脉重建术后的脑出血","authors":"Conrado J. Estol MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Carlos S. Kase MD","doi":"10.1053/j.scds.2006.01.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Carotid revascularization procedures for the prevention of </span>acute ischemic stroke<span><span> have a low but definite risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). After </span>carotid endarterectomy<span><span> (CEA) the risk is less than 1%, and accumulating data on the newer carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) procedure suggest a similar risk. A probably more common and underdiagnosed complication of CEA and CAS is the so-called “hyperperfusion” syndrome. A post-revascularization increase in cerebral blood flow (CBF) in the ipsilateral hemisphere is thought to underlie the </span>pathophysiology<span> of the syndrome. The increased unilateral hemispheric CBF leads to vasogenic edema due to re-perfusion of maximally dilated capillaries which have lost their autoregulatory capacity as a result of chronic ischemia. The clinical features of severe post-procedural hypertension followed by headache, focal neurological deficits, and seizures has an imaging correlate of unilateral hemispheric vasogenic edema in the absence of MRI features of infarction. In the absence of associated ICH, the symptoms often improve over a period of days after aggressive control of hypertension. The key to the prevention of the hyperperfusion syndrome and post-carotid revascularization ICH is close monitoring of peri-procedural blood pressure, and aggressive treatment of hypertension.</span></span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":101154,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Cerebrovascular Diseases and Stroke","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1053/j.scds.2006.01.009","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intracerebral Hemorrhage after Carotid Revascularization Procedures\",\"authors\":\"Conrado J. Estol MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Carlos S. Kase MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.scds.2006.01.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Carotid revascularization procedures for the prevention of </span>acute ischemic stroke<span><span> have a low but definite risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). After </span>carotid endarterectomy<span><span> (CEA) the risk is less than 1%, and accumulating data on the newer carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) procedure suggest a similar risk. A probably more common and underdiagnosed complication of CEA and CAS is the so-called “hyperperfusion” syndrome. A post-revascularization increase in cerebral blood flow (CBF) in the ipsilateral hemisphere is thought to underlie the </span>pathophysiology<span> of the syndrome. The increased unilateral hemispheric CBF leads to vasogenic edema due to re-perfusion of maximally dilated capillaries which have lost their autoregulatory capacity as a result of chronic ischemia. The clinical features of severe post-procedural hypertension followed by headache, focal neurological deficits, and seizures has an imaging correlate of unilateral hemispheric vasogenic edema in the absence of MRI features of infarction. In the absence of associated ICH, the symptoms often improve over a period of days after aggressive control of hypertension. The key to the prevention of the hyperperfusion syndrome and post-carotid revascularization ICH is close monitoring of peri-procedural blood pressure, and aggressive treatment of hypertension.</span></span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Cerebrovascular Diseases and Stroke\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1053/j.scds.2006.01.009\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Cerebrovascular Diseases and Stroke\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1528993106000100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Cerebrovascular Diseases and Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1528993106000100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

颈动脉血运重建术预防急性缺血性中风有低但明确的脑出血(ICH)风险。颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后的风险小于1%,更新的颈动脉成形术和支架置入术(CAS)的累积数据表明风险相似。CEA和CAS更常见的未被诊断的并发症是所谓的“高灌注”综合征。血运重建后同侧半球脑血流量(CBF)的增加被认为是该综合征病理生理学的基础。增加的单侧半球CBF导致血管源性水肿,这是由于最大扩张的毛细血管的再灌注,这些毛细血管由于慢性缺血而失去了自身调节能力。术后严重高血压伴头痛、局灶性神经功能缺损和癫痫发作的临床特征在没有梗死MRI特征的情况下与单侧半球血管源性水肿的影像学特征相关。在没有相关脑出血的情况下,这些症状通常在积极控制高血压后的一段时间内得到改善。预防高灌注综合征和颈动脉血运重建术后颅内出血的关键是严密监测术中血压,积极治疗高血压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intracerebral Hemorrhage after Carotid Revascularization Procedures

Carotid revascularization procedures for the prevention of acute ischemic stroke have a low but definite risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). After carotid endarterectomy (CEA) the risk is less than 1%, and accumulating data on the newer carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) procedure suggest a similar risk. A probably more common and underdiagnosed complication of CEA and CAS is the so-called “hyperperfusion” syndrome. A post-revascularization increase in cerebral blood flow (CBF) in the ipsilateral hemisphere is thought to underlie the pathophysiology of the syndrome. The increased unilateral hemispheric CBF leads to vasogenic edema due to re-perfusion of maximally dilated capillaries which have lost their autoregulatory capacity as a result of chronic ischemia. The clinical features of severe post-procedural hypertension followed by headache, focal neurological deficits, and seizures has an imaging correlate of unilateral hemispheric vasogenic edema in the absence of MRI features of infarction. In the absence of associated ICH, the symptoms often improve over a period of days after aggressive control of hypertension. The key to the prevention of the hyperperfusion syndrome and post-carotid revascularization ICH is close monitoring of peri-procedural blood pressure, and aggressive treatment of hypertension.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Introduction Table of contents Advances in the Treatment and Management of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Intraventricular Hemorrhage: Presentation and Management Options
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1