个人笔记与合作笔记:学生笔记完整性、考试成绩和学术写作的准实验研究结果

IF 6.8 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Internet and Higher Education Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100873
Matthew Courtney , Jamie Costley , Matthew Baldwin , Kyungmee Lee , Mik Fanguy
{"title":"个人笔记与合作笔记:学生笔记完整性、考试成绩和学术写作的准实验研究结果","authors":"Matthew Courtney ,&nbsp;Jamie Costley ,&nbsp;Matthew Baldwin ,&nbsp;Kyungmee Lee ,&nbsp;Mik Fanguy","doi":"10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is research showing benefits to both collaboration and note-taking, but a lack of research into how they may both work together in an online context. More specifically, there is a gap in the research looking at how collaborative note-taking and individual note-taking can be compared when considering the quality of the notes taken, and how note-quality can impact student performance. The present study looks at the online note-taking behavior and performance of 186 graduate students studying at a Korean university. The results indicate that students who collaborate perform better than individual note-takers on measures of recall of course content, but that individual note-takers perform better on tasks focused on academic writing. Furthermore, the findings suggest that note-quality has no effect on collaborative note-takers' recall of course content, and a slight negative impact on their writing, while individual note-takers benefit from higher quality notes for both recall and writing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48186,"journal":{"name":"Internet and Higher Education","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 100873"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S109675162200029X/pdfft?md5=218af55c63d1556c954b28fccee03601&pid=1-s2.0-S109675162200029X-main.pdf","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individual versus collaborative note-taking: Results of a quasi-experimental study on student note completeness, test performance, and academic writing\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Courtney ,&nbsp;Jamie Costley ,&nbsp;Matthew Baldwin ,&nbsp;Kyungmee Lee ,&nbsp;Mik Fanguy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100873\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>There is research showing benefits to both collaboration and note-taking, but a lack of research into how they may both work together in an online context. More specifically, there is a gap in the research looking at how collaborative note-taking and individual note-taking can be compared when considering the quality of the notes taken, and how note-quality can impact student performance. The present study looks at the online note-taking behavior and performance of 186 graduate students studying at a Korean university. The results indicate that students who collaborate perform better than individual note-takers on measures of recall of course content, but that individual note-takers perform better on tasks focused on academic writing. Furthermore, the findings suggest that note-quality has no effect on collaborative note-takers' recall of course content, and a slight negative impact on their writing, while individual note-takers benefit from higher quality notes for both recall and writing.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internet and Higher Education\",\"volume\":\"55 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100873\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S109675162200029X/pdfft?md5=218af55c63d1556c954b28fccee03601&pid=1-s2.0-S109675162200029X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internet and Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S109675162200029X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet and Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S109675162200029X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

有研究表明协作和记笔记都有好处,但缺乏关于它们如何在在线环境中协同工作的研究。更具体地说,在考虑到笔记的质量,以及笔记的质量如何影响学生的表现时,如何比较合作笔记和个人笔记的研究存在空白。本研究调查了韩国一所大学186名研究生的在线笔记行为和表现。结果表明,在回忆课程内容方面,合作的学生比单独记笔记的学生表现得更好,但在学术写作方面,单独记笔记的学生表现得更好。此外,研究结果表明,笔记质量对合作记笔记者对课程内容的回忆没有影响,对他们的写作有轻微的负面影响,而个人记笔记者则受益于更高质量的笔记,无论是回忆还是写作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Individual versus collaborative note-taking: Results of a quasi-experimental study on student note completeness, test performance, and academic writing

There is research showing benefits to both collaboration and note-taking, but a lack of research into how they may both work together in an online context. More specifically, there is a gap in the research looking at how collaborative note-taking and individual note-taking can be compared when considering the quality of the notes taken, and how note-quality can impact student performance. The present study looks at the online note-taking behavior and performance of 186 graduate students studying at a Korean university. The results indicate that students who collaborate perform better than individual note-takers on measures of recall of course content, but that individual note-takers perform better on tasks focused on academic writing. Furthermore, the findings suggest that note-quality has no effect on collaborative note-takers' recall of course content, and a slight negative impact on their writing, while individual note-takers benefit from higher quality notes for both recall and writing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Internet and Higher Education
Internet and Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
4.70%
发文量
30
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The Internet and Higher Education is a quarterly peer-reviewed journal focused on contemporary issues and future trends in online learning, teaching, and administration within post-secondary education. It welcomes contributions from diverse academic disciplines worldwide and provides a platform for theory papers, research studies, critical essays, editorials, reviews, case studies, and social commentary.
期刊最新文献
Effects of stem activities in virtual reality environments on preservice teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge and technology acceptance Mapping the structure of student burnout in online learning: An integrated Gaussian model and directed acyclic graph approach Emotional artificial intelligence in higher education: A systematic review Human-AI collaboration or obedient and often clueless AI in instruct, serve, repeat dynamics? Matching the moderator role with task level in asynchronous online discussions: Insights from a randomized experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1