OPD-Scan III自行屈光与非睫状体瘫痪患者主观屈光的相关性及差异比较

You Yuan, Panpan Li, Mengyu Wang, Xiaobo Huang, Yu Song, E. Song
{"title":"OPD-Scan III自行屈光与非睫状体瘫痪患者主观屈光的相关性及差异比较","authors":"You Yuan, Panpan Li, Mengyu Wang, Xiaobo Huang, Yu Song, E. Song","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: \nTo compare the correlations and differences between autorefraction measured by OPD-Scan III in light and dark modes with non-cycloplegic subjective refraction. \n \n \nMethods: \nThis was a series of case studies. One hundred and two patients (204 eyes) with refractive errors were selected from the Ideal Ophthalmology Hospital affiliated to Soochow University during July 2018. All patients underwent autorefraction with OPD-Scan III and subjective refraction with a competent optometrist. Statistical analyses and comparisons were made on spherical (S), cylinder (C), spherical equivalent (SE), J0 (Jackson cross-cylindervalues at 180° and 90°) and J45 (Jackson cross-cylindervalues at 135° and 45°). Data were statistically analyzed using a t test, regression test and Pearson correlation. \n \n \nResults: \nThe values of S, C, SE, J0 and J45 measured under OPD-Scan III light mode were positively correlated with those measured by subjective optometry (r=0.797, 0.877, 0.806, 0.918, 0.623, all P<0.001). All the measurements showed statistically significant differences. The values of S, C and SE measured under OPD-Scan III illumination were -0.33 D, -0.08 D, and -0.37 D were higher than those measured under subjective optometry, and the differences were statistically significant between the two measurements (t=4.232, 3.058, 4.741, all P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference for J0 but J45 showed a statistically significant difference (t=-2.342, P=0.021). The values of S, C, SE, J0, and J45 measured under OPD-Scan III dark light mode were positively correlated with the values measured by subjective optometry (r=0.877, 0.629, 0.894, 0.753, 0.466, all P<0.001). The values of S, C and SE measured by OPD-Scan III under dark light were higher than those measured by subjective optometry, -0.57 D, -0.41 D, and -0.77 D, respectively, and the differences were statistically significant between the two measurements (t=8.864, 8.777, 3.263, all P<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference for J0 and J45. \n \n \nConclusions: \nThe correlations and differences between the autorefractions measured by OPD-Scan III in light and dark mode with subjective refraction showed statistical significance. But the difference between autorefraction measured by OPD-Scan III in light mode and subjective optometry is small, which is acceptable in the clinic. \n \n \nKey words: \nOPD-Scan III; refractive errors; autorefraction; subjective refraction","PeriodicalId":10142,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology","volume":"84 1","pages":"895-899"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Correlations and Differences between the Autorefraction Measured by OPD-Scan III and Non-Cycloplegic Subjective Refraction\",\"authors\":\"You Yuan, Panpan Li, Mengyu Wang, Xiaobo Huang, Yu Song, E. Song\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.12.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: \\nTo compare the correlations and differences between autorefraction measured by OPD-Scan III in light and dark modes with non-cycloplegic subjective refraction. \\n \\n \\nMethods: \\nThis was a series of case studies. One hundred and two patients (204 eyes) with refractive errors were selected from the Ideal Ophthalmology Hospital affiliated to Soochow University during July 2018. All patients underwent autorefraction with OPD-Scan III and subjective refraction with a competent optometrist. Statistical analyses and comparisons were made on spherical (S), cylinder (C), spherical equivalent (SE), J0 (Jackson cross-cylindervalues at 180° and 90°) and J45 (Jackson cross-cylindervalues at 135° and 45°). Data were statistically analyzed using a t test, regression test and Pearson correlation. \\n \\n \\nResults: \\nThe values of S, C, SE, J0 and J45 measured under OPD-Scan III light mode were positively correlated with those measured by subjective optometry (r=0.797, 0.877, 0.806, 0.918, 0.623, all P<0.001). All the measurements showed statistically significant differences. The values of S, C and SE measured under OPD-Scan III illumination were -0.33 D, -0.08 D, and -0.37 D were higher than those measured under subjective optometry, and the differences were statistically significant between the two measurements (t=4.232, 3.058, 4.741, all P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference for J0 but J45 showed a statistically significant difference (t=-2.342, P=0.021). The values of S, C, SE, J0, and J45 measured under OPD-Scan III dark light mode were positively correlated with the values measured by subjective optometry (r=0.877, 0.629, 0.894, 0.753, 0.466, all P<0.001). The values of S, C and SE measured by OPD-Scan III under dark light were higher than those measured by subjective optometry, -0.57 D, -0.41 D, and -0.77 D, respectively, and the differences were statistically significant between the two measurements (t=8.864, 8.777, 3.263, all P<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference for J0 and J45. \\n \\n \\nConclusions: \\nThe correlations and differences between the autorefractions measured by OPD-Scan III in light and dark mode with subjective refraction showed statistical significance. But the difference between autorefraction measured by OPD-Scan III in light mode and subjective optometry is small, which is acceptable in the clinic. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nOPD-Scan III; refractive errors; autorefraction; subjective refraction\",\"PeriodicalId\":10142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"895-899\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.12.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.12.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较OPD-Scan III在明暗模式下测量的自体屈光与非睫状体麻痹的主观屈光的相关性和差异。方法:采用一系列的个案研究。选择2018年7月苏州大学附属理想眼科医院屈光不正患者102例(204只眼)。所有患者均接受OPD-Scan III自行验光,并由合格验光师进行主观验光。对球面(S)、圆柱体(C)、球面等效(SE)、J0(180°和90°Jackson cross-圆柱体值)和J45(135°和45°Jackson cross-圆柱体值)进行统计分析和比较。数据采用t检验、回归检验和Pearson相关进行统计学分析。结果:OPD-Scan III光模式下测得的S、C、SE、J0、J45值与主观验光测得值呈正相关(r=0.797、0.877、0.806、0.918、0.623,P均<0.001)。所有的测量结果都显示出统计学上的显著差异。OPD-Scan III照明下测得的S、C、SE值分别为-0.33 D、-0.08 D、-0.37 D,高于主观验光下测得的S、C、SE值,两者差异有统计学意义(t=4.232、3.058、4.741,P均<0.05)。J0组差异无统计学意义,而J45组差异有统计学意义(t=-2.342, P=0.021)。OPD-Scan III暗光模式下测得的S、C、SE、J0、J45值与主观验光测得的值呈正相关(r=0.877、0.629、0.894、0.753、0.466,P均<0.001)。暗光下OPD-Scan III测得的S、C、SE值分别高于主观验光测得的-0.57 D、-0.41 D、-0.77 D,两者差异有统计学意义(t=8.864、8.777、3.263,P均<0.001)。J0与J45的差异无统计学意义。结论:OPD-Scan III在明暗模式下测得的自体屈光度与主观屈光度的相关性及差异均有统计学意义。但OPD-Scan III在光模式下测量的自屈光与主观验光的差异很小,在临床上是可以接受的。关键词:OPD-Scan III;屈光不正;autorefraction;主观的折射
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of the Correlations and Differences between the Autorefraction Measured by OPD-Scan III and Non-Cycloplegic Subjective Refraction
Objective: To compare the correlations and differences between autorefraction measured by OPD-Scan III in light and dark modes with non-cycloplegic subjective refraction. Methods: This was a series of case studies. One hundred and two patients (204 eyes) with refractive errors were selected from the Ideal Ophthalmology Hospital affiliated to Soochow University during July 2018. All patients underwent autorefraction with OPD-Scan III and subjective refraction with a competent optometrist. Statistical analyses and comparisons were made on spherical (S), cylinder (C), spherical equivalent (SE), J0 (Jackson cross-cylindervalues at 180° and 90°) and J45 (Jackson cross-cylindervalues at 135° and 45°). Data were statistically analyzed using a t test, regression test and Pearson correlation. Results: The values of S, C, SE, J0 and J45 measured under OPD-Scan III light mode were positively correlated with those measured by subjective optometry (r=0.797, 0.877, 0.806, 0.918, 0.623, all P<0.001). All the measurements showed statistically significant differences. The values of S, C and SE measured under OPD-Scan III illumination were -0.33 D, -0.08 D, and -0.37 D were higher than those measured under subjective optometry, and the differences were statistically significant between the two measurements (t=4.232, 3.058, 4.741, all P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference for J0 but J45 showed a statistically significant difference (t=-2.342, P=0.021). The values of S, C, SE, J0, and J45 measured under OPD-Scan III dark light mode were positively correlated with the values measured by subjective optometry (r=0.877, 0.629, 0.894, 0.753, 0.466, all P<0.001). The values of S, C and SE measured by OPD-Scan III under dark light were higher than those measured by subjective optometry, -0.57 D, -0.41 D, and -0.77 D, respectively, and the differences were statistically significant between the two measurements (t=8.864, 8.777, 3.263, all P<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference for J0 and J45. Conclusions: The correlations and differences between the autorefractions measured by OPD-Scan III in light and dark mode with subjective refraction showed statistical significance. But the difference between autorefraction measured by OPD-Scan III in light mode and subjective optometry is small, which is acceptable in the clinic. Key words: OPD-Scan III; refractive errors; autorefraction; subjective refraction
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Practice and Effectiveness of COVID-19 RNA Detection in the Prevention and Control of Ophthalmic Hospital Correct Choice of Goggles and Anti-fog Guidance Duringthe Epidemic Period of COVID-19 2019-nCoV and Eye, What We Know and What We Should Do Clinical Application Value of a Preset Marking Line in Lacrimal Endoscopic Surgery Characteristics of Macular Microvascular Changes in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1