大型企业风险管理的证据推理方法

IF 1 4区 计算机科学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems Pub Date : 2012-07-09 DOI:10.1142/S0218488512400028
D. Tang, Jianbo Yang, D. Bamford, Dongling Xu, M. Waugh, J. Bamford, Shulian Zhang
{"title":"大型企业风险管理的证据推理方法","authors":"D. Tang, Jianbo Yang, D. Bamford, Dongling Xu, M. Waugh, J. Bamford, Shulian Zhang","doi":"10.1142/S0218488512400028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) is a framework that is used by large organizations to manage risk as a whole. The key difference between ERM and traditional risk management is that in the latter risks are managed individually, whilst the former requires the aggregation of risks to facilitate risk management. However, current methods for risk aggregation have various limitations when applied under the context of ERM, such as the requirement for accurate and complete information about risk factors, the inability to handle different kinds of uncertainty which are inevitable during the risk aggregation process, and so on. Due to its unique advantages in accommodating different forms of both complete and incomplete information and handling different kinds of uncertainty, the Evidential Reasoning (ER) approach together with its implementation entitled Intelligent Decision System (IDS) is introduced in this paper for risk aggregation in ERM to overcome the limitations and to provide a comprehensive analysis for risk management based on the aggregation result. To demonstrate the applicability of the ER approach and IDS in ERM, a case study is analyzed in detail regarding risk aggregation and risk management for a health care organization in North England.","PeriodicalId":50283,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems","volume":"31 1","pages":"17-30"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The evidential reasoning approach for risk management in large enterprises\",\"authors\":\"D. Tang, Jianbo Yang, D. Bamford, Dongling Xu, M. Waugh, J. Bamford, Shulian Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/S0218488512400028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) is a framework that is used by large organizations to manage risk as a whole. The key difference between ERM and traditional risk management is that in the latter risks are managed individually, whilst the former requires the aggregation of risks to facilitate risk management. However, current methods for risk aggregation have various limitations when applied under the context of ERM, such as the requirement for accurate and complete information about risk factors, the inability to handle different kinds of uncertainty which are inevitable during the risk aggregation process, and so on. Due to its unique advantages in accommodating different forms of both complete and incomplete information and handling different kinds of uncertainty, the Evidential Reasoning (ER) approach together with its implementation entitled Intelligent Decision System (IDS) is introduced in this paper for risk aggregation in ERM to overcome the limitations and to provide a comprehensive analysis for risk management based on the aggregation result. To demonstrate the applicability of the ER approach and IDS in ERM, a case study is analyzed in detail regarding risk aggregation and risk management for a health care organization in North England.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"17-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488512400028\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488512400028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

企业风险管理(ERM)是大型组织用于整体管理风险的框架。ERM与传统风险管理的主要区别在于,后者的风险是单独管理的,而前者需要风险的集合来促进风险管理。然而,现有的风险聚合方法在ERM背景下应用时存在着各种局限性,如对风险因素信息的准确和完整要求,无法处理风险聚合过程中不可避免的各种不确定性等。由于证据推理方法在适应不同形式的完全信息和不完全信息以及处理不同类型的不确定性方面具有独特的优势,本文将证据推理方法及其实现方法——智能决策系统(IDS)引入到ERM中的风险聚合中,以克服其局限性,并基于聚合结果为风险管理提供综合分析。为了证明急诊室方法和IDS在ERM中的适用性,本文详细分析了英格兰北部一家医疗保健组织的风险汇总和风险管理案例研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The evidential reasoning approach for risk management in large enterprises
Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) is a framework that is used by large organizations to manage risk as a whole. The key difference between ERM and traditional risk management is that in the latter risks are managed individually, whilst the former requires the aggregation of risks to facilitate risk management. However, current methods for risk aggregation have various limitations when applied under the context of ERM, such as the requirement for accurate and complete information about risk factors, the inability to handle different kinds of uncertainty which are inevitable during the risk aggregation process, and so on. Due to its unique advantages in accommodating different forms of both complete and incomplete information and handling different kinds of uncertainty, the Evidential Reasoning (ER) approach together with its implementation entitled Intelligent Decision System (IDS) is introduced in this paper for risk aggregation in ERM to overcome the limitations and to provide a comprehensive analysis for risk management based on the aggregation result. To demonstrate the applicability of the ER approach and IDS in ERM, a case study is analyzed in detail regarding risk aggregation and risk management for a health care organization in North England.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
13.5 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems is a forum for research on various methodologies for the management of imprecise, vague, uncertain or incomplete information. The aim of the journal is to promote theoretical or methodological works dealing with all kinds of methods to represent and manipulate imperfectly described pieces of knowledge, excluding results on pure mathematics or simple applications of existing theoretical results. It is published bimonthly, with worldwide distribution to researchers, engineers, decision-makers, and educators.
期刊最新文献
A Structure-Enhanced Heterogeneous Graph Representation Learning with Attention-Supplemented Embedding Fusion Homogenous Ensembles of Neuro-Fuzzy Classifiers using Hyperparameter Tuning for Medical Data PSO Based Constraint Optimization of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Shortest Path Problem in an Undirected Network Model Predictive Control for Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Systems with Unknown Time-Varying Delay in States and Input Vector An OWA Based MCDM Framework for Analyzing Multidimensional Twitter Data: A Case Study on the Citizen-Government Engagement During COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1