{"title":"基于三维有限元分析(FEA)的两级代理辅助差分进化电机多目标优化。","authors":"N. Taran, D. Ionel, D. Dorrel","doi":"10.1109/INTMAG.2018.8508483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many parameters are considered in electric machine design and an optimization algorithm can be used. These usually need thousands of design evaluations before meeting the termination criterion. Time consuming 3D finite element analyses (FEAs) are not tenable although machines with 3D flux paths, such as axial flux and transverse flux, cannot be accurately evaluated with 2D models. One solution is to use surrogate models rather than 3D FEA; however, the accuracy of surrogate models reduces for a large and nonlinear search space. Another solution can utilize algorithms that find the global optima with a minimum number of design evaluations. A combination of these two solutions is proposed here.","PeriodicalId":6571,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE International Magnetic Conference (INTERMAG)","volume":"95 1","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two-Level Surrogate-Assisted Differential Evolution Multi-ob-jective Optimization of Electric Machines Using 3D Finite Element Analysis (FEA).\",\"authors\":\"N. Taran, D. Ionel, D. Dorrel\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/INTMAG.2018.8508483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many parameters are considered in electric machine design and an optimization algorithm can be used. These usually need thousands of design evaluations before meeting the termination criterion. Time consuming 3D finite element analyses (FEAs) are not tenable although machines with 3D flux paths, such as axial flux and transverse flux, cannot be accurately evaluated with 2D models. One solution is to use surrogate models rather than 3D FEA; however, the accuracy of surrogate models reduces for a large and nonlinear search space. Another solution can utilize algorithms that find the global optima with a minimum number of design evaluations. A combination of these two solutions is proposed here.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE International Magnetic Conference (INTERMAG)\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"1-2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE International Magnetic Conference (INTERMAG)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/INTMAG.2018.8508483\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE International Magnetic Conference (INTERMAG)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INTMAG.2018.8508483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Two-Level Surrogate-Assisted Differential Evolution Multi-ob-jective Optimization of Electric Machines Using 3D Finite Element Analysis (FEA).
Many parameters are considered in electric machine design and an optimization algorithm can be used. These usually need thousands of design evaluations before meeting the termination criterion. Time consuming 3D finite element analyses (FEAs) are not tenable although machines with 3D flux paths, such as axial flux and transverse flux, cannot be accurately evaluated with 2D models. One solution is to use surrogate models rather than 3D FEA; however, the accuracy of surrogate models reduces for a large and nonlinear search space. Another solution can utilize algorithms that find the global optima with a minimum number of design evaluations. A combination of these two solutions is proposed here.