日语版Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag Assessment创建Tool——评估它的可靠性和有效性——

孝宜 諸澄, 民世 金, 純久 折田, Trevor A. Lentz, 拓史 橋川, 義信 萩原, S. George, 精司 大鳥, 淳 寺門
{"title":"日语版Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag Assessment创建Tool——评估它的可靠性和有效性——","authors":"孝宜 諸澄, 民世 金, 純久 折田, Trevor A. Lentz, 拓史 橋川, 義信 萩原, S. George, 精司 大鳥, 淳 寺門","doi":"10.34371/JSPINERES.2019-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: In recent years, it has been reported that psychosocial factors of patients with orthopedic disorders are involved in pain chronicity. Thus, it is effective to attend to psychosocial aspects as early as possible. The “Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag (OSPRO-YF)” assessment tool collects patient-reported outcomes for 17 items, which can comprehensively evaluate multiple psychological factors. We developed the Japanese version of OSPROYF (OSPRO-YF-J) and verified its reliability and validity. Methods: First, after obtaining permission to develop the Japanese version, we translated OSPRO-YF according to international guidelines. In the preliminary analysis (n = 21; average age, 49.1±20.4 years; 5 males and 16 females), we evaluated the cross-cultural understanding of item expressions and time required to complete the questionnaire. In addition, we verified its reliability. We statistically analyzed reliability in terms of reproducibility, internal consistency, and absolute reliability. We then verified the external validity of OSPRO-YF-J in a separate sample (n = 251; average age, 65.3±13.4 years; 70 males and 181 females). We summarized the obtained data descriptively and confirmed the presence of the ceiling and floor effects. Results: The average time required to complete OSPRO-YF-J was 4.4±2.4 minutes, and the average score was 36.6±10.3 points. No ceiling or floor effect was observed. For reproducibility (Intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.86), Cronbach’s α was 0.84, correlation coefficients for each item ranged from 0.4 to 0.7. Furthermore, in Bland-Altman analysis, no systematic errors (fixed or proportional errors) but only accidental errors were recognized in OSPRO-YF-J. Conclusions: OSPRO-YF-J was confirmed to show good reliability and validity. OSPRO-YF-J is a comprehensive psychological evaluation scale and can be easily implemented in the clinical setting. Therefore, we think that it is a practical questionnaire for evaluating psychological factors.","PeriodicalId":73951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine research and surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"日本語版Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag Assessment Toolの作成―その信頼性と妥当性の検討―\",\"authors\":\"孝宜 諸澄, 民世 金, 純久 折田, Trevor A. Lentz, 拓史 橋川, 義信 萩原, S. George, 精司 大鳥, 淳 寺門\",\"doi\":\"10.34371/JSPINERES.2019-0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: In recent years, it has been reported that psychosocial factors of patients with orthopedic disorders are involved in pain chronicity. Thus, it is effective to attend to psychosocial aspects as early as possible. The “Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag (OSPRO-YF)” assessment tool collects patient-reported outcomes for 17 items, which can comprehensively evaluate multiple psychological factors. We developed the Japanese version of OSPROYF (OSPRO-YF-J) and verified its reliability and validity. Methods: First, after obtaining permission to develop the Japanese version, we translated OSPRO-YF according to international guidelines. In the preliminary analysis (n = 21; average age, 49.1±20.4 years; 5 males and 16 females), we evaluated the cross-cultural understanding of item expressions and time required to complete the questionnaire. In addition, we verified its reliability. We statistically analyzed reliability in terms of reproducibility, internal consistency, and absolute reliability. We then verified the external validity of OSPRO-YF-J in a separate sample (n = 251; average age, 65.3±13.4 years; 70 males and 181 females). We summarized the obtained data descriptively and confirmed the presence of the ceiling and floor effects. Results: The average time required to complete OSPRO-YF-J was 4.4±2.4 minutes, and the average score was 36.6±10.3 points. No ceiling or floor effect was observed. For reproducibility (Intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.86), Cronbach’s α was 0.84, correlation coefficients for each item ranged from 0.4 to 0.7. Furthermore, in Bland-Altman analysis, no systematic errors (fixed or proportional errors) but only accidental errors were recognized in OSPRO-YF-J. Conclusions: OSPRO-YF-J was confirmed to show good reliability and validity. OSPRO-YF-J is a comprehensive psychological evaluation scale and can be easily implemented in the clinical setting. Therefore, we think that it is a practical questionnaire for evaluating psychological factors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of spine research and surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of spine research and surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34371/JSPINERES.2019-0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine research and surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34371/JSPINERES.2019-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,有报道称骨科疾病患者的心理社会因素与疼痛的慢性性有关。因此,尽早关注心理社会方面是有效的。“预测转诊和转归的最佳筛查黄旗(OSPRO-YF)”评估工具收集患者报告的17项结果,可综合评估多种心理因素。我们开发了日本版的OSPROYF (OSPRO-YF-J),并验证了其信度和效度。方法:首先,在获得日文版开发许可后,按照国际标准对OSPRO-YF进行翻译。在初步分析中(n = 21;平均年龄49.1±20.4岁;5名男性和16名女性),我们评估了项目表达的跨文化理解和完成问卷所需的时间。此外,我们验证了它的可靠性。我们在再现性、内部一致性和绝对可靠性方面进行了统计分析。然后,我们在单独的样本中验证了OSPRO-YF-J的外部效度(n = 251;平均年龄65.3±13.4岁;70名男性和181名女性)。我们对获得的数据进行了描述性总结,并证实了天花板和地板效应的存在。结果:完成OSPRO-YF-J的平均时间为4.4±2.4分钟,平均得分为36.6±10.3分。没有观察到天花板或地板效应。在重现性方面(类内相关系数= 0.86),Cronbach 's α为0.84,各条目相关系数为0.4 ~ 0.7。此外,在Bland-Altman分析中,OSPRO-YF-J没有识别出系统误差(固定误差或比例误差),只有偶然误差。结论:OSPRO-YF-J具有良好的信效度。OSPRO-YF-J是一种综合性心理评估量表,易于在临床环境中实施。因此,我们认为这是一份实用的心理因素评价问卷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日本語版Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag Assessment Toolの作成―その信頼性と妥当性の検討―
Introduction: In recent years, it has been reported that psychosocial factors of patients with orthopedic disorders are involved in pain chronicity. Thus, it is effective to attend to psychosocial aspects as early as possible. The “Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag (OSPRO-YF)” assessment tool collects patient-reported outcomes for 17 items, which can comprehensively evaluate multiple psychological factors. We developed the Japanese version of OSPROYF (OSPRO-YF-J) and verified its reliability and validity. Methods: First, after obtaining permission to develop the Japanese version, we translated OSPRO-YF according to international guidelines. In the preliminary analysis (n = 21; average age, 49.1±20.4 years; 5 males and 16 females), we evaluated the cross-cultural understanding of item expressions and time required to complete the questionnaire. In addition, we verified its reliability. We statistically analyzed reliability in terms of reproducibility, internal consistency, and absolute reliability. We then verified the external validity of OSPRO-YF-J in a separate sample (n = 251; average age, 65.3±13.4 years; 70 males and 181 females). We summarized the obtained data descriptively and confirmed the presence of the ceiling and floor effects. Results: The average time required to complete OSPRO-YF-J was 4.4±2.4 minutes, and the average score was 36.6±10.3 points. No ceiling or floor effect was observed. For reproducibility (Intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.86), Cronbach’s α was 0.84, correlation coefficients for each item ranged from 0.4 to 0.7. Furthermore, in Bland-Altman analysis, no systematic errors (fixed or proportional errors) but only accidental errors were recognized in OSPRO-YF-J. Conclusions: OSPRO-YF-J was confirmed to show good reliability and validity. OSPRO-YF-J is a comprehensive psychological evaluation scale and can be easily implemented in the clinical setting. Therefore, we think that it is a practical questionnaire for evaluating psychological factors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modification of the Diabetes Prevention Program Lifestyle Intervention in Persons with Spinal Cord Injury: Efficacy for Reducing Major Cardiometabolic Risks, Increased Fitness, and Improved Health-Related Quality of Life. The Decline of Lumbar Artificial Disc Replacement. Peripheral Nerve Regeneration: Opportunities and Challenges. Mechanobiology of MicroRNAs in Intervertebral Disk Degeneration. Long-Term Outcomes of the Spinal Cord Injury Assessing Tolerability and Use of Combine Rehabilitation and NeuroAID (SATURN STUDY)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1