两种体内人体实验模型评估护肤霜的双重特性

T. Diepgen, K. Andersen, E. Schnetz, O. Kuss, M. Fartasch
{"title":"两种体内人体实验模型评估护肤霜的双重特性","authors":"T. Diepgen, K. Andersen, E. Schnetz, O. Kuss, M. Fartasch","doi":"10.1081/CUS-120022756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of skin care creams is a well documented protection measure to reduce the risk of barrier damage and contact dermatitis from exogenous contact with skin irritants. Before choosing a skin care cream two aspects should be considered: a) Is the product able to reduce irritant reactions caused by the irritant, and b) is the product well tolerated, also on damaged skin. Both aspects can be evaluated by experimental models in human volunteers. We used two standard experimental designs to compare six commercially available skin care products: a) the chamber scarification test, designed to assess the irritancy potential, and b) the repeated short-time occlusive irritation test (ROIT), developed to evaluate the efficacy of skin care creams. The results showed that a high score in the chamber scarification test for skin irritation was not necessarily correlated to the products' ability to impede sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS)-induced irritant skin reactions. Three products were shown to both have a low irritancy potential and be capable of reducing skin barrier damage induced by SLS, and one product had both an irritant potential on scarified skin and also a modest capability to reduce skin irritation induced by SLS. The use of both test methods, chamber scarification and ROIT, gives valuable information on skin compatibility and efficacy of skin care creams. The clinical relevance of the test results can only be determined by comparing products with high and low scores in both tests in controlled clinical experiments with subjects at risk of developing irritant contact dermatitis.","PeriodicalId":17547,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Toxicology-cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology","volume":"21 1","pages":"157 - 167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dual Characteristics of Skin Care Creams Evaluated by Two In-Vivo Human Experimental Models\",\"authors\":\"T. Diepgen, K. Andersen, E. Schnetz, O. Kuss, M. Fartasch\",\"doi\":\"10.1081/CUS-120022756\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of skin care creams is a well documented protection measure to reduce the risk of barrier damage and contact dermatitis from exogenous contact with skin irritants. Before choosing a skin care cream two aspects should be considered: a) Is the product able to reduce irritant reactions caused by the irritant, and b) is the product well tolerated, also on damaged skin. Both aspects can be evaluated by experimental models in human volunteers. We used two standard experimental designs to compare six commercially available skin care products: a) the chamber scarification test, designed to assess the irritancy potential, and b) the repeated short-time occlusive irritation test (ROIT), developed to evaluate the efficacy of skin care creams. The results showed that a high score in the chamber scarification test for skin irritation was not necessarily correlated to the products' ability to impede sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS)-induced irritant skin reactions. Three products were shown to both have a low irritancy potential and be capable of reducing skin barrier damage induced by SLS, and one product had both an irritant potential on scarified skin and also a modest capability to reduce skin irritation induced by SLS. The use of both test methods, chamber scarification and ROIT, gives valuable information on skin compatibility and efficacy of skin care creams. The clinical relevance of the test results can only be determined by comparing products with high and low scores in both tests in controlled clinical experiments with subjects at risk of developing irritant contact dermatitis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Toxicology-cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"157 - 167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Toxicology-cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1081/CUS-120022756\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Toxicology-cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1081/CUS-120022756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

使用护肤霜是一种有充分证据的保护措施,可以减少皮肤刺激物外源性接触造成的屏障损伤和接触性皮炎的风险。在选择护肤霜之前应该考虑两个方面:a)产品是否能够减少刺激物引起的刺激反应,b)产品是否耐受性好,也对受损皮肤有影响。这两个方面都可以通过人类志愿者的实验模型来评估。我们采用两种标准实验设计来比较六种市售护肤品:a)用于评估刺激潜力的腔室划伤试验,b)用于评估护肤霜功效的重复短时间闭塞刺激试验(ROIT)。结果表明,在室内划伤试验中皮肤刺激的高分并不一定与产品阻止十二烷基硫酸钠(SLS)诱导的皮肤刺激反应的能力相关。三种产品均显示出低刺激电位并能够减少SLS引起的皮肤屏障损伤,一种产品对结痂皮肤既有刺激电位,也有适度的减少SLS引起的皮肤刺激的能力。使用两种测试方法,腔室划痕和ROIT,提供皮肤相容性和护肤霜功效的宝贵信息。测试结果的临床相关性只能通过在对照临床实验中比较两项测试的高分和低分产品来确定,实验对象有患刺激性接触性皮炎的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dual Characteristics of Skin Care Creams Evaluated by Two In-Vivo Human Experimental Models
The use of skin care creams is a well documented protection measure to reduce the risk of barrier damage and contact dermatitis from exogenous contact with skin irritants. Before choosing a skin care cream two aspects should be considered: a) Is the product able to reduce irritant reactions caused by the irritant, and b) is the product well tolerated, also on damaged skin. Both aspects can be evaluated by experimental models in human volunteers. We used two standard experimental designs to compare six commercially available skin care products: a) the chamber scarification test, designed to assess the irritancy potential, and b) the repeated short-time occlusive irritation test (ROIT), developed to evaluate the efficacy of skin care creams. The results showed that a high score in the chamber scarification test for skin irritation was not necessarily correlated to the products' ability to impede sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS)-induced irritant skin reactions. Three products were shown to both have a low irritancy potential and be capable of reducing skin barrier damage induced by SLS, and one product had both an irritant potential on scarified skin and also a modest capability to reduce skin irritation induced by SLS. The use of both test methods, chamber scarification and ROIT, gives valuable information on skin compatibility and efficacy of skin care creams. The clinical relevance of the test results can only be determined by comparing products with high and low scores in both tests in controlled clinical experiments with subjects at risk of developing irritant contact dermatitis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Persistent Palmar Plaques—Another Possible Cutaneous Sign of Mercury Poisoning Ocular Side Effects Associated with Systemic Isotretinoin Retinoic Acid Reduces Ocular Elongation in Chicks with Form‐Deprivation Myopia Corneal Organ Culture Model for Assessing Epithelial Recovery After Surfactant Exposure Alterations of Calcium Homeostasis Affect the Survival of Human Retinal Epithelial Cells
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1