Hossein Khajehpour, N. Norouzi, Zahra Jafarabadi, Ghassem Valizadeh, Mohammad Hemmati
{"title":"基于混合流体梯级制冷系统的气体液化和气体伴生液体回收协同过程的能量、火用和燃烧经济性(3E)分析","authors":"Hossein Khajehpour, N. Norouzi, Zahra Jafarabadi, Ghassem Valizadeh, Mohammad Hemmati","doi":"10.30492/IJCCE.2021.141462.4442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, energy, exergy, and exergoeconomic analysis is performed on the recent trend of joint production of liquefied natural gas and natural gas liquids based on Mixed fluid cascade most important refrigeration systems. The proposed process is first simulated and exergticly analyzed, and finally, an economic model is used to analyze the exergoeconomic performance. The results include the cost of exergy destruction, exergoeconomic factors, and exergy efficiency. The exergy analysis results show that the proposed process’s exergy efficiency is about 53.84%, and the destruction rate is 42618 kW with LNG and NGL production rates of 69.00 kg/s and 27.42 kg/s, respectively. Also, results show that the maximum exergoeconomic factor, which is 69.53%, is related to the second compressor in the liquefaction cycle. The lowest exergoeconomic factor, which is 0.67%, is related to the fourth heat exchanger in the liquefaction cycle. In this process, the distillation tower has the highest relative cost variation (100.81), and the first air cooler in the liquefaction cycle has the smallest relative cost difference (1.08). One of the most costly economic factors is the cost of exergy destruction rates. The second heat exchanger has the exergy destruction cost (768.93 $/GJ), and the first air cooler in the liquefaction cycle has the lowest exergy destruction cost (19.38 $/GJ).","PeriodicalId":14572,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering-international English Edition","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energy, exergy, and exergoeconomic (3E) analysis of gas liquefaction and gas associated liquids recovery co-process based on the mixed fluid cascade refrigeration systems\",\"authors\":\"Hossein Khajehpour, N. Norouzi, Zahra Jafarabadi, Ghassem Valizadeh, Mohammad Hemmati\",\"doi\":\"10.30492/IJCCE.2021.141462.4442\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, energy, exergy, and exergoeconomic analysis is performed on the recent trend of joint production of liquefied natural gas and natural gas liquids based on Mixed fluid cascade most important refrigeration systems. The proposed process is first simulated and exergticly analyzed, and finally, an economic model is used to analyze the exergoeconomic performance. The results include the cost of exergy destruction, exergoeconomic factors, and exergy efficiency. The exergy analysis results show that the proposed process’s exergy efficiency is about 53.84%, and the destruction rate is 42618 kW with LNG and NGL production rates of 69.00 kg/s and 27.42 kg/s, respectively. Also, results show that the maximum exergoeconomic factor, which is 69.53%, is related to the second compressor in the liquefaction cycle. The lowest exergoeconomic factor, which is 0.67%, is related to the fourth heat exchanger in the liquefaction cycle. In this process, the distillation tower has the highest relative cost variation (100.81), and the first air cooler in the liquefaction cycle has the smallest relative cost difference (1.08). One of the most costly economic factors is the cost of exergy destruction rates. The second heat exchanger has the exergy destruction cost (768.93 $/GJ), and the first air cooler in the liquefaction cycle has the lowest exergy destruction cost (19.38 $/GJ).\",\"PeriodicalId\":14572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering-international English Edition\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering-international English Edition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30492/IJCCE.2021.141462.4442\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering-international English Edition","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30492/IJCCE.2021.141462.4442","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Energy, exergy, and exergoeconomic (3E) analysis of gas liquefaction and gas associated liquids recovery co-process based on the mixed fluid cascade refrigeration systems
In this paper, energy, exergy, and exergoeconomic analysis is performed on the recent trend of joint production of liquefied natural gas and natural gas liquids based on Mixed fluid cascade most important refrigeration systems. The proposed process is first simulated and exergticly analyzed, and finally, an economic model is used to analyze the exergoeconomic performance. The results include the cost of exergy destruction, exergoeconomic factors, and exergy efficiency. The exergy analysis results show that the proposed process’s exergy efficiency is about 53.84%, and the destruction rate is 42618 kW with LNG and NGL production rates of 69.00 kg/s and 27.42 kg/s, respectively. Also, results show that the maximum exergoeconomic factor, which is 69.53%, is related to the second compressor in the liquefaction cycle. The lowest exergoeconomic factor, which is 0.67%, is related to the fourth heat exchanger in the liquefaction cycle. In this process, the distillation tower has the highest relative cost variation (100.81), and the first air cooler in the liquefaction cycle has the smallest relative cost difference (1.08). One of the most costly economic factors is the cost of exergy destruction rates. The second heat exchanger has the exergy destruction cost (768.93 $/GJ), and the first air cooler in the liquefaction cycle has the lowest exergy destruction cost (19.38 $/GJ).
期刊介绍:
The aim of the Iranian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering is to foster the growth of educational, scientific and Industrial Research activities among chemists and chemical engineers and to provide a medium for mutual communication and relations between Iranian academia and the industry on the one hand, and the world the scientific community on the other.