基于油藏不确定性特征的成熟油藏综合研究创造价值——以尼日尔三角洲油田A05油藏为例

A. Jaja, Nnamdi Okani, Vincent Eme, Ricardo Combella Ricardos, Chevron Gom, Lynn Silpngarmlers
{"title":"基于油藏不确定性特征的成熟油藏综合研究创造价值——以尼日尔三角洲油田A05油藏为例","authors":"A. Jaja, Nnamdi Okani, Vincent Eme, Ricardo Combella Ricardos, Chevron Gom, Lynn Silpngarmlers","doi":"10.2118/198822-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In the Early phases of field development, the drilled hydrocarbon appraisal wells may not have been sufficient to define rock properties, fluid typing and contacts. It's very important to define the range of uncertainty in such fields. This is because as the field matures other dynamic data will become available to validate these probable volumes.\n The ideal development scenario provides the practitioner with a full suite of data defining the reservoir geometries, reservoir properties, fluid properties etc. to make subsurface decisions. However, in most cases, operational realities will deny the reservoir practitioner this full suite of data.\n One practical convention that is used to resolve this data paucity challenge is to evaluate and report the lowest possible volume, if this low case is economic the project will be economic with potential for more upside outcomes. However, a challenge that can arise with this is that after several iterations the low case can become the only case. A better practice is to characterize uncertainty of reservoir parameters during the early stages of field development and carry out the full range outcomes through the field's life. These ranges will then be validated as the field matures.\n This paper demonstrates a case in the Niger Delta field A05 reservoir were dynamic simulation model was used to narrow the uncertainty range on the GOC. Proper identification and characterization of the GOC uncertainties helped for the estimate of a range of STOOIP used for dynamic simulation model. Though no static dataset was available to reduce this uncertainty on the GOC, during dynamic simulation, the high-case oil in-place volume was found to be the best match to historical production data with the integration of another reservoir, Delta A12, in one dynamic simulation model. Both reservoirs communicate through the aquifer, separated by a saddle. This then proved up additional volumes in the reservoir, identified previously overlooked reserves and allowed the asset team to propose an extra infill well opportunity than what was previously planned. This new understanding of the A05 reservoir increased the oil estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) by 4.6 MMSTBO.","PeriodicalId":11110,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, August 06, 2019","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creating Value Through Integrated Reservoir Study in Mature Asset via Reservoir Uncertainty Characterization: A Case Study from the Niger Delta Field A05 Reservoir\",\"authors\":\"A. Jaja, Nnamdi Okani, Vincent Eme, Ricardo Combella Ricardos, Chevron Gom, Lynn Silpngarmlers\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/198822-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In the Early phases of field development, the drilled hydrocarbon appraisal wells may not have been sufficient to define rock properties, fluid typing and contacts. It's very important to define the range of uncertainty in such fields. This is because as the field matures other dynamic data will become available to validate these probable volumes.\\n The ideal development scenario provides the practitioner with a full suite of data defining the reservoir geometries, reservoir properties, fluid properties etc. to make subsurface decisions. However, in most cases, operational realities will deny the reservoir practitioner this full suite of data.\\n One practical convention that is used to resolve this data paucity challenge is to evaluate and report the lowest possible volume, if this low case is economic the project will be economic with potential for more upside outcomes. However, a challenge that can arise with this is that after several iterations the low case can become the only case. A better practice is to characterize uncertainty of reservoir parameters during the early stages of field development and carry out the full range outcomes through the field's life. These ranges will then be validated as the field matures.\\n This paper demonstrates a case in the Niger Delta field A05 reservoir were dynamic simulation model was used to narrow the uncertainty range on the GOC. Proper identification and characterization of the GOC uncertainties helped for the estimate of a range of STOOIP used for dynamic simulation model. Though no static dataset was available to reduce this uncertainty on the GOC, during dynamic simulation, the high-case oil in-place volume was found to be the best match to historical production data with the integration of another reservoir, Delta A12, in one dynamic simulation model. Both reservoirs communicate through the aquifer, separated by a saddle. This then proved up additional volumes in the reservoir, identified previously overlooked reserves and allowed the asset team to propose an extra infill well opportunity than what was previously planned. This new understanding of the A05 reservoir increased the oil estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) by 4.6 MMSTBO.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Tue, August 06, 2019\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Tue, August 06, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/198822-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, August 06, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/198822-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在油田开发的早期阶段,已钻探的油气评价井可能不足以确定岩石性质、流体类型和接触面。在这些领域中,确定不确定性的范围是非常重要的。这是因为随着油田的成熟,其他动态数据将可用来验证这些可能的体积。理想的开发方案为作业人员提供了一套完整的数据,可以定义储层的几何形状、储层性质、流体性质等,从而做出地下决策。然而,在大多数情况下,操作现实会使油藏从业者无法获得这套完整的数据。解决这种数据缺乏挑战的一个实用惯例是评估和报告尽可能低的量,如果这种低的情况是经济的,那么项目将是经济的,并有更多的潜在收益。然而,由此产生的一个挑战是,经过几次迭代后,低情况可能成为唯一的情况。更好的做法是在油田开发的早期阶段对油藏参数的不确定性进行表征,并在油田的整个生命周期中进行全面的结果分析。随着油田的成熟,这些范围将得到验证。以尼日尔三角洲油田A05油藏为例,采用动态模拟模型来缩小GOC的不确定性范围。正确地识别和表征GOC不确定性有助于动态模拟模型中STOOIP范围的估计。虽然没有可用的静态数据集来减少GOC的不确定性,但在动态模拟过程中,在一个动态模拟模型中,发现高情况下的产油量与另一个油藏Delta A12的历史生产数据最匹配。两个水库都通过含水层连通,中间隔着一个鞍。这证明了储层的额外体积,确定了以前被忽视的储量,并允许资产团队提出比以前计划的额外的填充井机会。对A05油藏的新认识使原油估计最终采收率(EUR)提高了460万stbo。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Creating Value Through Integrated Reservoir Study in Mature Asset via Reservoir Uncertainty Characterization: A Case Study from the Niger Delta Field A05 Reservoir
In the Early phases of field development, the drilled hydrocarbon appraisal wells may not have been sufficient to define rock properties, fluid typing and contacts. It's very important to define the range of uncertainty in such fields. This is because as the field matures other dynamic data will become available to validate these probable volumes. The ideal development scenario provides the practitioner with a full suite of data defining the reservoir geometries, reservoir properties, fluid properties etc. to make subsurface decisions. However, in most cases, operational realities will deny the reservoir practitioner this full suite of data. One practical convention that is used to resolve this data paucity challenge is to evaluate and report the lowest possible volume, if this low case is economic the project will be economic with potential for more upside outcomes. However, a challenge that can arise with this is that after several iterations the low case can become the only case. A better practice is to characterize uncertainty of reservoir parameters during the early stages of field development and carry out the full range outcomes through the field's life. These ranges will then be validated as the field matures. This paper demonstrates a case in the Niger Delta field A05 reservoir were dynamic simulation model was used to narrow the uncertainty range on the GOC. Proper identification and characterization of the GOC uncertainties helped for the estimate of a range of STOOIP used for dynamic simulation model. Though no static dataset was available to reduce this uncertainty on the GOC, during dynamic simulation, the high-case oil in-place volume was found to be the best match to historical production data with the integration of another reservoir, Delta A12, in one dynamic simulation model. Both reservoirs communicate through the aquifer, separated by a saddle. This then proved up additional volumes in the reservoir, identified previously overlooked reserves and allowed the asset team to propose an extra infill well opportunity than what was previously planned. This new understanding of the A05 reservoir increased the oil estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) by 4.6 MMSTBO.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Well Production Tubing Diameter on Multiphase Flow Regime Profile in Oredo Fields, Niger Delta, Nigeria Cassandra: A Model and Simulator Developed for Critical Drawdown Estimation in Unconsolidated Reservoirs The Use of 4D & Dynamic Synthesis in Brown Field Development: A Case Study of S-P3 Infill Well Maturation, Preparation and Drilling On the Characterisation of the Flow Regimes of Drilling Fluids Performance Evaluation of Cashew Nut Shell Liquid CNSL as Flow Improver for Waxy Crude Oils
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1