{"title":"是什么导致股市对流动性冲击反应不足?来自韩国的证据*","authors":"Jeewon Jang","doi":"10.1111/ajfs.12360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Stock-level liquidity shocks have a positive cross-sectional relation to not only contemporaneous returns but also one-month-ahead returns in the Korean stock market, which implies that the stock market underreacts to liquidity shocks. However, the return continuation after the arrival of liquidity shocks is short-lived and disappears in two months in Korea, unlike in the United States. The positive relation between liquidity shocks and one-month-ahead returns is most pronounced for illiquid stocks but not present for liquid stocks, independently of the level of investor attention. However, the effect of limited attention on the positive relation differs somewhat across alternative attention proxies and becomes insignificant after controlling for liquidity. This evidence suggests that the short-lived underreaction to liquidity shocks in the Korean stock market is primarily driven not by inattention but by illiquidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":8570,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies","volume":"51 1","pages":"44-80"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Drives Stock Market Underreaction to Liquidity Shocks? Evidence from Korea*\",\"authors\":\"Jeewon Jang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajfs.12360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Stock-level liquidity shocks have a positive cross-sectional relation to not only contemporaneous returns but also one-month-ahead returns in the Korean stock market, which implies that the stock market underreacts to liquidity shocks. However, the return continuation after the arrival of liquidity shocks is short-lived and disappears in two months in Korea, unlike in the United States. The positive relation between liquidity shocks and one-month-ahead returns is most pronounced for illiquid stocks but not present for liquid stocks, independently of the level of investor attention. However, the effect of limited attention on the positive relation differs somewhat across alternative attention proxies and becomes insignificant after controlling for liquidity. This evidence suggests that the short-lived underreaction to liquidity shocks in the Korean stock market is primarily driven not by inattention but by illiquidity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"44-80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajfs.12360\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajfs.12360","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
What Drives Stock Market Underreaction to Liquidity Shocks? Evidence from Korea*
Stock-level liquidity shocks have a positive cross-sectional relation to not only contemporaneous returns but also one-month-ahead returns in the Korean stock market, which implies that the stock market underreacts to liquidity shocks. However, the return continuation after the arrival of liquidity shocks is short-lived and disappears in two months in Korea, unlike in the United States. The positive relation between liquidity shocks and one-month-ahead returns is most pronounced for illiquid stocks but not present for liquid stocks, independently of the level of investor attention. However, the effect of limited attention on the positive relation differs somewhat across alternative attention proxies and becomes insignificant after controlling for liquidity. This evidence suggests that the short-lived underreaction to liquidity shocks in the Korean stock market is primarily driven not by inattention but by illiquidity.