是什么导致股市对流动性冲击反应不足?来自韩国的证据*

IF 1.8 4区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies Pub Date : 2022-02-01 DOI:10.1111/ajfs.12360
Jeewon Jang
{"title":"是什么导致股市对流动性冲击反应不足?来自韩国的证据*","authors":"Jeewon Jang","doi":"10.1111/ajfs.12360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Stock-level liquidity shocks have a positive cross-sectional relation to not only contemporaneous returns but also one-month-ahead returns in the Korean stock market, which implies that the stock market underreacts to liquidity shocks. However, the return continuation after the arrival of liquidity shocks is short-lived and disappears in two months in Korea, unlike in the United States. The positive relation between liquidity shocks and one-month-ahead returns is most pronounced for illiquid stocks but not present for liquid stocks, independently of the level of investor attention. However, the effect of limited attention on the positive relation differs somewhat across alternative attention proxies and becomes insignificant after controlling for liquidity. This evidence suggests that the short-lived underreaction to liquidity shocks in the Korean stock market is primarily driven not by inattention but by illiquidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":8570,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies","volume":"51 1","pages":"44-80"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Drives Stock Market Underreaction to Liquidity Shocks? Evidence from Korea*\",\"authors\":\"Jeewon Jang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajfs.12360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Stock-level liquidity shocks have a positive cross-sectional relation to not only contemporaneous returns but also one-month-ahead returns in the Korean stock market, which implies that the stock market underreacts to liquidity shocks. However, the return continuation after the arrival of liquidity shocks is short-lived and disappears in two months in Korea, unlike in the United States. The positive relation between liquidity shocks and one-month-ahead returns is most pronounced for illiquid stocks but not present for liquid stocks, independently of the level of investor attention. However, the effect of limited attention on the positive relation differs somewhat across alternative attention proxies and becomes insignificant after controlling for liquidity. This evidence suggests that the short-lived underreaction to liquidity shocks in the Korean stock market is primarily driven not by inattention but by illiquidity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"44-80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajfs.12360\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajfs.12360","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

股市流动性冲击不仅与同期收益呈正相关,而且与韩国股市一个月前的收益也呈正相关,这意味着股市对流动性冲击的反应不足。但韩国与美国不同,流动性冲击到来后的回潮持续时间很短,2个月后就会消失。流动性冲击与一个月前回报之间的正相关关系在非流动性股票中最为明显,但在流动性股票中不存在,与投资者关注程度无关。然而,有限注意对正相关的影响在不同的注意代理中有所不同,并且在控制流动性后变得不显著。这一证据表明,韩国股市对流动性冲击的短暂反应不足,主要不是由于注意力不集中,而是由于流动性不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What Drives Stock Market Underreaction to Liquidity Shocks? Evidence from Korea*

Stock-level liquidity shocks have a positive cross-sectional relation to not only contemporaneous returns but also one-month-ahead returns in the Korean stock market, which implies that the stock market underreacts to liquidity shocks. However, the return continuation after the arrival of liquidity shocks is short-lived and disappears in two months in Korea, unlike in the United States. The positive relation between liquidity shocks and one-month-ahead returns is most pronounced for illiquid stocks but not present for liquid stocks, independently of the level of investor attention. However, the effect of limited attention on the positive relation differs somewhat across alternative attention proxies and becomes insignificant after controlling for liquidity. This evidence suggests that the short-lived underreaction to liquidity shocks in the Korean stock market is primarily driven not by inattention but by illiquidity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Acknowledgement Issue Information Acknowledgement Media Attention and Labor Investment Efficiency*
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1