{"title":"利用固态厌氧沼气池对蘑菇堆肥与柳枝稷进行共消化","authors":"R. Nair, A. Thalla, V. V. Nair","doi":"10.1680/jwarm.22.00009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spent Mushroom Compost (SMC) already broken down into smaller particles by fungal action is an ideal material for producing biogas. Two cycles of five Solid State Anaerobic Digesters (SS-ADs) with different mix-ratio of SMC and Switchgrass (SG) were operated at feedstock-to-effluent ratio (F/E) of 2 at a temperature 35±2°C. The total solids concentration of the digester was kept at ∼17%. Initial biogas production observed during the start-up of the digester confirmed the presence of readily available extractives for digestion. In the first cycle, the highest methane yield was observed in SMC 0 (0% SMC + 100% SG) of 28.82 L/kg VS/d and the lowest yield was observed in SMC 4 (100% SMC + 0% SG) as 10.32 L/kg VS/d. The substrate containing 100% SG (SMC 0) recorded the highest cumulative biogas yield of 295.43 L/kg VS in 63 days. The digesters with higher SMC fraction showed lower methane production, low pH value, and high VFA content upon decomposition. The SS-ADs having SMC/SG of 50:50 showed more than 2 times methane production in comparison with SS-ADs having SMC as sole substrate. An estimation of volumetric productivity also established a linear relationship with the SMC/SG ratio.","PeriodicalId":45077,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Waste and Resource Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-digestion of mushroom compost with switchgrass using solid–state anaerobic digester\",\"authors\":\"R. Nair, A. Thalla, V. V. Nair\",\"doi\":\"10.1680/jwarm.22.00009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Spent Mushroom Compost (SMC) already broken down into smaller particles by fungal action is an ideal material for producing biogas. Two cycles of five Solid State Anaerobic Digesters (SS-ADs) with different mix-ratio of SMC and Switchgrass (SG) were operated at feedstock-to-effluent ratio (F/E) of 2 at a temperature 35±2°C. The total solids concentration of the digester was kept at ∼17%. Initial biogas production observed during the start-up of the digester confirmed the presence of readily available extractives for digestion. In the first cycle, the highest methane yield was observed in SMC 0 (0% SMC + 100% SG) of 28.82 L/kg VS/d and the lowest yield was observed in SMC 4 (100% SMC + 0% SG) as 10.32 L/kg VS/d. The substrate containing 100% SG (SMC 0) recorded the highest cumulative biogas yield of 295.43 L/kg VS in 63 days. The digesters with higher SMC fraction showed lower methane production, low pH value, and high VFA content upon decomposition. The SS-ADs having SMC/SG of 50:50 showed more than 2 times methane production in comparison with SS-ADs having SMC as sole substrate. An estimation of volumetric productivity also established a linear relationship with the SMC/SG ratio.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Waste and Resource Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Waste and Resource Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1680/jwarm.22.00009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Waste and Resource Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jwarm.22.00009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Co-digestion of mushroom compost with switchgrass using solid–state anaerobic digester
Spent Mushroom Compost (SMC) already broken down into smaller particles by fungal action is an ideal material for producing biogas. Two cycles of five Solid State Anaerobic Digesters (SS-ADs) with different mix-ratio of SMC and Switchgrass (SG) were operated at feedstock-to-effluent ratio (F/E) of 2 at a temperature 35±2°C. The total solids concentration of the digester was kept at ∼17%. Initial biogas production observed during the start-up of the digester confirmed the presence of readily available extractives for digestion. In the first cycle, the highest methane yield was observed in SMC 0 (0% SMC + 100% SG) of 28.82 L/kg VS/d and the lowest yield was observed in SMC 4 (100% SMC + 0% SG) as 10.32 L/kg VS/d. The substrate containing 100% SG (SMC 0) recorded the highest cumulative biogas yield of 295.43 L/kg VS in 63 days. The digesters with higher SMC fraction showed lower methane production, low pH value, and high VFA content upon decomposition. The SS-ADs having SMC/SG of 50:50 showed more than 2 times methane production in comparison with SS-ADs having SMC as sole substrate. An estimation of volumetric productivity also established a linear relationship with the SMC/SG ratio.
期刊介绍:
Waste and Resource Management publishes original research and practice papers on all civil engineering and construction related aspects of the resource management cycle, from the minimization of waste, through the re-use and recycling, to the management and disposal of residual wastes. Associated legislation, standards, socio-economic considerations and links with sustainable consumption and production are included. The range of subjects covered encompasses, but is not restricted to, strategies for reducing construction waste through better design, improved recovery and re-use, more efficient resource management, the performance of materials recovered from wastes, and, the procurement, planning, design, construction, operation and logistics of waste and resource management facilities.