地质解释对储层三维静态模型的影响:工作流程、方法方法和交付过程

A. Agi, Afeez O. Gbadamosi, R. Junin, S. Kampit, Azza Hashim Abbas, J. Gbonhinbor
{"title":"地质解释对储层三维静态模型的影响:工作流程、方法方法和交付过程","authors":"A. Agi, Afeez O. Gbadamosi, R. Junin, S. Kampit, Azza Hashim Abbas, J. Gbonhinbor","doi":"10.2118/198719-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The traditional method of geologic modelling requires the interpretation of geological sections during digitization. But this traditional method has its limitations, the main limits are; it is usually time consuming and the model produced is unique to each individual geologist interpretation and may not be easily replicated by others. This study proposes an alternative workflow method for modelling, constructing and interpreting 3D geologic static model with multi-source data integration. The volume base method (VBM) was used to construct the 3D model. The combination of deterministic and probabilistic methods was used to model the facies workflow process to capture the geometrics of depositional environmental element. The truncated Gaussian simulation method was used with vertical trends option to obtain vertical transitional lithofacies in most of the reservoirs. Verification of results and detailed discussion of the proposed workflow and methodology is based on comparison with the conventional method. The saturation height function (SHF) equation applied to the water saturation model and permeability model improved the 3-D properties modelling workflow. The pillar gridding process was identified as the stage that increases the timeframe in 3-D modelling workflow. The results have proven to improve the overall timeframe and maximize the value of the field studies. The proposed method can be applied to a broad and complex geologic area. And is useful for marginal field development, by contributing economically and improving the deliverability of the entire project.","PeriodicalId":11110,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, August 06, 2019","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Geological Interpretation on Reservoir 3D Static Model: Workflow, Methodology Approach and Delivery Process\",\"authors\":\"A. Agi, Afeez O. Gbadamosi, R. Junin, S. Kampit, Azza Hashim Abbas, J. Gbonhinbor\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/198719-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The traditional method of geologic modelling requires the interpretation of geological sections during digitization. But this traditional method has its limitations, the main limits are; it is usually time consuming and the model produced is unique to each individual geologist interpretation and may not be easily replicated by others. This study proposes an alternative workflow method for modelling, constructing and interpreting 3D geologic static model with multi-source data integration. The volume base method (VBM) was used to construct the 3D model. The combination of deterministic and probabilistic methods was used to model the facies workflow process to capture the geometrics of depositional environmental element. The truncated Gaussian simulation method was used with vertical trends option to obtain vertical transitional lithofacies in most of the reservoirs. Verification of results and detailed discussion of the proposed workflow and methodology is based on comparison with the conventional method. The saturation height function (SHF) equation applied to the water saturation model and permeability model improved the 3-D properties modelling workflow. The pillar gridding process was identified as the stage that increases the timeframe in 3-D modelling workflow. The results have proven to improve the overall timeframe and maximize the value of the field studies. The proposed method can be applied to a broad and complex geologic area. And is useful for marginal field development, by contributing economically and improving the deliverability of the entire project.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Tue, August 06, 2019\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Tue, August 06, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/198719-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, August 06, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/198719-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

传统的地质建模方法需要在数字化过程中对地质剖面进行解释。但这种传统方法也有其局限性,主要局限在;它通常是耗时的,并且产生的模型对每个地质学家的解释都是独一无二的,并且可能不容易被其他人复制。本文提出了一种多源数据集成的三维地质静态模型建模、构建和解释的替代工作流方法。采用体基法(VBM)构建三维模型。采用确定性和概率相结合的方法对相流过程进行建模,以捕捉沉积环境要素的几何特征。采用截尾高斯模拟方法,结合垂向趋势选项,获得了大部分储层的垂向过渡岩相。在与传统方法比较的基础上,验证了结果并详细讨论了所提出的工作流程和方法。将饱和高度函数(SHF)方程应用于含水饱和度模型和渗透率模型,改进了三维物性建模工作流程。将支柱网格化过程确定为三维建模工作流程中增加时间框架的阶段。事实证明,这些结果改善了总体时间框架,并最大限度地提高了实地研究的价值。该方法适用于广泛而复杂的地质区域。这对于边际油田的开发非常有用,因为它在经济上做出了贡献,并提高了整个项目的可交付性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of Geological Interpretation on Reservoir 3D Static Model: Workflow, Methodology Approach and Delivery Process
The traditional method of geologic modelling requires the interpretation of geological sections during digitization. But this traditional method has its limitations, the main limits are; it is usually time consuming and the model produced is unique to each individual geologist interpretation and may not be easily replicated by others. This study proposes an alternative workflow method for modelling, constructing and interpreting 3D geologic static model with multi-source data integration. The volume base method (VBM) was used to construct the 3D model. The combination of deterministic and probabilistic methods was used to model the facies workflow process to capture the geometrics of depositional environmental element. The truncated Gaussian simulation method was used with vertical trends option to obtain vertical transitional lithofacies in most of the reservoirs. Verification of results and detailed discussion of the proposed workflow and methodology is based on comparison with the conventional method. The saturation height function (SHF) equation applied to the water saturation model and permeability model improved the 3-D properties modelling workflow. The pillar gridding process was identified as the stage that increases the timeframe in 3-D modelling workflow. The results have proven to improve the overall timeframe and maximize the value of the field studies. The proposed method can be applied to a broad and complex geologic area. And is useful for marginal field development, by contributing economically and improving the deliverability of the entire project.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Well Production Tubing Diameter on Multiphase Flow Regime Profile in Oredo Fields, Niger Delta, Nigeria Cassandra: A Model and Simulator Developed for Critical Drawdown Estimation in Unconsolidated Reservoirs The Use of 4D & Dynamic Synthesis in Brown Field Development: A Case Study of S-P3 Infill Well Maturation, Preparation and Drilling On the Characterisation of the Flow Regimes of Drilling Fluids Performance Evaluation of Cashew Nut Shell Liquid CNSL as Flow Improver for Waxy Crude Oils
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1