细菌性脑膜炎和脑炎的有效经验性抗菌治疗

Diyan Ajeng Rossetyowati, I. P. Sari, T. Andayani, T. Nuryastuti
{"title":"细菌性脑膜炎和脑炎的有效经验性抗菌治疗","authors":"Diyan Ajeng Rossetyowati, I. P. Sari, T. Andayani, T. Nuryastuti","doi":"10.30595/pharmacy.v18i2.13257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bacterial meningitis-encephalitis (ME) management therapy is critical to appropriately manage clinical outcomes. This study aims to provide recommendations on appropriate empiric antimicrobial to support the healing period and reduce the risk of disease severity. A cross-sectional study, including inpatients without comorbid diagnosed with bacterial ME, was conducted, and records of antimicrobial prescriptions were obtained. Sociodemographic, clinical (diagnostic), and pharmacological (antimicrobial) variables were assessed. Through multivariate analysis, variables associated with the use of antimicrobials for bacterial infections were identified. A total of 45 patients with ME. The patients, who were from surrounding Center Java and Yogyakarta, had a mean age of 11.27 ± 16.93 years and a male predominance of 56.9% (n = 23). The most frequent bacterial infections were caused by: S. haemolyticus and S. epidermidis (25.93%). A total of 100% the patients (n = 45) received a prescription for empiric antibiotics, predominantly 3rd generation cephalosporin e.c ceftriaxone (35.56%) and cefotaxime (13.33%). Empiric antimicrobials are frequently prescribed for the first management of bacterial ME, are considered an inappropriate practice due to a lack of clinical benefits, increased generation of antimicrobial resistance, and risk of adverse reactions due to the use of medications that patients do not require. Drug utilization studies are a great tool for monitoring how antimicrobial is being used and planning interventions to improve their use.","PeriodicalId":19897,"journal":{"name":"PHARMACY: Jurnal Farmasi Indonesia (Pharmaceutical Journal of Indonesia)","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effective Empiric Antimicrobial Therapy of Bacterial Meningitis and Encephalitis\",\"authors\":\"Diyan Ajeng Rossetyowati, I. P. Sari, T. Andayani, T. Nuryastuti\",\"doi\":\"10.30595/pharmacy.v18i2.13257\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bacterial meningitis-encephalitis (ME) management therapy is critical to appropriately manage clinical outcomes. This study aims to provide recommendations on appropriate empiric antimicrobial to support the healing period and reduce the risk of disease severity. A cross-sectional study, including inpatients without comorbid diagnosed with bacterial ME, was conducted, and records of antimicrobial prescriptions were obtained. Sociodemographic, clinical (diagnostic), and pharmacological (antimicrobial) variables were assessed. Through multivariate analysis, variables associated with the use of antimicrobials for bacterial infections were identified. A total of 45 patients with ME. The patients, who were from surrounding Center Java and Yogyakarta, had a mean age of 11.27 ± 16.93 years and a male predominance of 56.9% (n = 23). The most frequent bacterial infections were caused by: S. haemolyticus and S. epidermidis (25.93%). A total of 100% the patients (n = 45) received a prescription for empiric antibiotics, predominantly 3rd generation cephalosporin e.c ceftriaxone (35.56%) and cefotaxime (13.33%). Empiric antimicrobials are frequently prescribed for the first management of bacterial ME, are considered an inappropriate practice due to a lack of clinical benefits, increased generation of antimicrobial resistance, and risk of adverse reactions due to the use of medications that patients do not require. Drug utilization studies are a great tool for monitoring how antimicrobial is being used and planning interventions to improve their use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PHARMACY: Jurnal Farmasi Indonesia (Pharmaceutical Journal of Indonesia)\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PHARMACY: Jurnal Farmasi Indonesia (Pharmaceutical Journal of Indonesia)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30595/pharmacy.v18i2.13257\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHARMACY: Jurnal Farmasi Indonesia (Pharmaceutical Journal of Indonesia)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30595/pharmacy.v18i2.13257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

细菌性脑膜炎-脑炎(ME)管理治疗是适当管理临床结果的关键。本研究旨在提供适当的经验性抗菌药物建议,以支持愈合期和降低疾病严重程度的风险。对未合并细菌性ME的住院患者进行了横断面研究,并获得了抗菌药物处方的记录。评估社会人口学、临床(诊断)和药理学(抗菌)变量。通过多变量分析,确定了与抗菌药物用于细菌感染相关的变量。共有45例ME患者。患者来自中爪哇和日惹周边地区,平均年龄11.27±16.93岁,男性占56.9% (n = 23)。最常见的细菌感染是溶血链球菌和表皮链球菌(25.93%)。所有患者(45例)均有经验性抗生素处方,以第三代头孢菌素为主,如头孢曲松(35.56%)和头孢噻肟(13.33%)。经验性抗菌素经常用于细菌性ME的首次治疗,由于缺乏临床益处,增加了抗菌素耐药性的产生,并且由于使用患者不需要的药物而存在不良反应的风险,因此被认为是一种不适当的做法。药物利用研究是监测抗菌药物使用情况和规划干预措施以改进其使用的重要工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effective Empiric Antimicrobial Therapy of Bacterial Meningitis and Encephalitis
Bacterial meningitis-encephalitis (ME) management therapy is critical to appropriately manage clinical outcomes. This study aims to provide recommendations on appropriate empiric antimicrobial to support the healing period and reduce the risk of disease severity. A cross-sectional study, including inpatients without comorbid diagnosed with bacterial ME, was conducted, and records of antimicrobial prescriptions were obtained. Sociodemographic, clinical (diagnostic), and pharmacological (antimicrobial) variables were assessed. Through multivariate analysis, variables associated with the use of antimicrobials for bacterial infections were identified. A total of 45 patients with ME. The patients, who were from surrounding Center Java and Yogyakarta, had a mean age of 11.27 ± 16.93 years and a male predominance of 56.9% (n = 23). The most frequent bacterial infections were caused by: S. haemolyticus and S. epidermidis (25.93%). A total of 100% the patients (n = 45) received a prescription for empiric antibiotics, predominantly 3rd generation cephalosporin e.c ceftriaxone (35.56%) and cefotaxime (13.33%). Empiric antimicrobials are frequently prescribed for the first management of bacterial ME, are considered an inappropriate practice due to a lack of clinical benefits, increased generation of antimicrobial resistance, and risk of adverse reactions due to the use of medications that patients do not require. Drug utilization studies are a great tool for monitoring how antimicrobial is being used and planning interventions to improve their use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cost Analysis of Telepharmacy Programs for Diabetes Mellitus Patients at Pharmacy Uji Efektivitas Sedatif-Hipnotik Ekstrak Daun Keji Beling (Strobilanthes crispa Blume) terhadap Mencit Putih Jantan Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai) Exocarp Extract Effectivity Against Blood Uric Acid Levels in Male Mice (Mus musculus) Antigenotoxic Potential of Dayak Onion Bulb and Leaf (Eleutherine bulbosa Urb.) Ethanol Extract with Allium cepa Assay Analisis Tingkat Kepuasan Responden Terhadap Kualitas Pemberian Informasi Obat Di UPT Puskesmas Bengkalis Kecamatan Bengkalis Provinsi Riau
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1