跨多校区的协同研究生教育

J. R. Thompson, G. R. Hess, T. A. Bowman, H. Magnusdottir, C. E. Stubbs-Gipson, M. Groom, J. R. Miller, T. A. Steelman, D. L. Stokes
{"title":"跨多校区的协同研究生教育","authors":"J. R. Thompson,&nbsp;G. R. Hess,&nbsp;T. A. Bowman,&nbsp;H. Magnusdottir,&nbsp;C. E. Stubbs-Gipson,&nbsp;M. Groom,&nbsp;J. R. Miller,&nbsp;T. A. Steelman,&nbsp;D. L. Stokes","doi":"10.2134/jnrlse2009.38116x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Multi-institutional approaches to graduate education continue to emerge as a way to better prepare students for collaborative work. In this article, we describe a graduate course designed to investigate application of conservation biology principles by local land use planners. “Where is Conservation Science in Local Planning?” was offered jointly by three institutions and integrated inquiry-guided, collaborative, and computer-mediated learning. Participants collaborated across universities to investigate this question and create products based on their work, including a presentation and two peer-reviewed manuscripts. We used a wiki for brainstorming and collaborative writing, a virtual classroom for work meetings, and video conferencing for building community and making complex decisions. Pre- and post-course questionnaires were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the course for improving skills in collaboration, use of collaborative technologies, and subject-area knowledge. Student development mirrored those areas where learning was required to consistently support class-wide activities. Students reported that they gained knowledge about collaboration, increased their mastery of communication skills and use of collaborative technologies, and gained knowledge about course subject matter. Students did not indicate significant changes in knowledge or activities related to leadership. Participants gained a fuller understanding of the benefits—collective creativity and enhanced accountability—and drawbacks—time required to build relationships and engage in deliberation—of collaborative research. Faculty participants suggest that future offerings continue to follow an inquiry-guided, collaborative learning approach using similar collaborative technologies, but include more explicit guidance about leadership and attempt to generate a smaller number of products.</p>","PeriodicalId":100810,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education","volume":"38 1","pages":"16-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2134/jnrlse2009.38116x","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collaborative Graduate Education across Multiple Campuses\",\"authors\":\"J. R. Thompson,&nbsp;G. R. Hess,&nbsp;T. A. Bowman,&nbsp;H. Magnusdottir,&nbsp;C. E. Stubbs-Gipson,&nbsp;M. Groom,&nbsp;J. R. Miller,&nbsp;T. A. Steelman,&nbsp;D. L. Stokes\",\"doi\":\"10.2134/jnrlse2009.38116x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Multi-institutional approaches to graduate education continue to emerge as a way to better prepare students for collaborative work. In this article, we describe a graduate course designed to investigate application of conservation biology principles by local land use planners. “Where is Conservation Science in Local Planning?” was offered jointly by three institutions and integrated inquiry-guided, collaborative, and computer-mediated learning. Participants collaborated across universities to investigate this question and create products based on their work, including a presentation and two peer-reviewed manuscripts. We used a wiki for brainstorming and collaborative writing, a virtual classroom for work meetings, and video conferencing for building community and making complex decisions. Pre- and post-course questionnaires were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the course for improving skills in collaboration, use of collaborative technologies, and subject-area knowledge. Student development mirrored those areas where learning was required to consistently support class-wide activities. Students reported that they gained knowledge about collaboration, increased their mastery of communication skills and use of collaborative technologies, and gained knowledge about course subject matter. Students did not indicate significant changes in knowledge or activities related to leadership. Participants gained a fuller understanding of the benefits—collective creativity and enhanced accountability—and drawbacks—time required to build relationships and engage in deliberation—of collaborative research. Faculty participants suggest that future offerings continue to follow an inquiry-guided, collaborative learning approach using similar collaborative technologies, but include more explicit guidance about leadership and attempt to generate a smaller number of products.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"16-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2134/jnrlse2009.38116x\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2134/jnrlse2009.38116x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2134/jnrlse2009.38116x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

研究生教育的多机构方法不断出现,成为更好地为学生的合作工作做好准备的一种方式。在这篇文章中,我们描述了一门研究生课程,旨在调查当地土地利用规划师对保护生物学原理的应用。“本地规划的保育科学在哪里?”是由三家机构联合提供的,整合了探究引导、协作和计算机媒介学习。参与者跨大学合作调查这个问题,并根据他们的工作创造产品,包括一份报告和两份同行评审的手稿。我们使用wiki来进行头脑风暴和协作写作,使用虚拟教室进行工作会议,使用视频会议来建立社区和做出复杂的决策。课程前和课程后的问卷被用来评估课程在提高协作技能、使用协作技术和学科领域知识方面的有效性。学生的发展反映了那些需要学习以持续支持班级活动的领域。学生们报告说,他们获得了关于协作的知识,提高了他们对沟通技巧和使用协作技术的掌握,并获得了关于课程主题的知识。学生在与领导力相关的知识或活动方面没有明显的变化。参与者更全面地了解了合作研究的好处——集体创造力和增强的问责制——以及缺点——建立关系和参与审议所需的时间。学院参与者建议,未来的课程继续遵循探究导向的协作学习方法,使用类似的协作技术,但包括更明确的关于领导力的指导,并尝试产生更少的产品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Collaborative Graduate Education across Multiple Campuses

Multi-institutional approaches to graduate education continue to emerge as a way to better prepare students for collaborative work. In this article, we describe a graduate course designed to investigate application of conservation biology principles by local land use planners. “Where is Conservation Science in Local Planning?” was offered jointly by three institutions and integrated inquiry-guided, collaborative, and computer-mediated learning. Participants collaborated across universities to investigate this question and create products based on their work, including a presentation and two peer-reviewed manuscripts. We used a wiki for brainstorming and collaborative writing, a virtual classroom for work meetings, and video conferencing for building community and making complex decisions. Pre- and post-course questionnaires were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the course for improving skills in collaboration, use of collaborative technologies, and subject-area knowledge. Student development mirrored those areas where learning was required to consistently support class-wide activities. Students reported that they gained knowledge about collaboration, increased their mastery of communication skills and use of collaborative technologies, and gained knowledge about course subject matter. Students did not indicate significant changes in knowledge or activities related to leadership. Participants gained a fuller understanding of the benefits—collective creativity and enhanced accountability—and drawbacks—time required to build relationships and engage in deliberation—of collaborative research. Faculty participants suggest that future offerings continue to follow an inquiry-guided, collaborative learning approach using similar collaborative technologies, but include more explicit guidance about leadership and attempt to generate a smaller number of products.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Corn Rootworm: Small Insect, Big Impact Assessing Student Learning with Surveys and a Pre-Test/Post-Test in an Online Course Student Presentations of Case Studies to Illustrate Core Concepts in Soil Biogeochemistry Using Student Competition Field Trips to Increase Teaching and Learning Effectiveness JNRLSE Editorial Board Minutes for 2011
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1