{"title":"舒适的美学:哥斯达黎加热带建筑历史的第三个时刻","authors":"Natalia Solano-Meza","doi":"10.4000/abe.8146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Histories of tropical architecture in Costa Rica could be constructed around three moments: the settlement of the United Fruit Company (ufco) in 1889, the visit of Otto H. Koenigsberger, director of the Department of Development and Tropical Studies during the opening of the School of Architecture of the University of Costa Rica in 1970, and finally, the constitution of a set of formal principles and images guiding the work of many architects in Costa Rica and justified by the need to provide comfort—or sensory contentment—in the tropical climate: an aesthetics of comfort. Although it is often considered a technical term, in our work, comfort operates also as a historical and aesthetic concept. Our research suggests that the aesthetics of comfort has been disseminated through journals and exhibitions since the 1990s, while also absorbing experiences from the two previous moments. Consequently, it cannot be separated from histories of colonialism, extractivism, hygiene, and interventionism. It is present, although in different forms and with different purposes, in the work of architects such as Edgar Brenes, Victor Canas and Bruno Stagno. In the media, their prominent achievements are presented as the result of responsiveness to nature, building technology, site adaptation and the ability to offer contentment. From our analysis, we claim that the aesthetics of comfort functions as a validation mechanism, one that praises technical knowledge and formal adaptation but tends to ignore histories of colonialism and knowledge production.","PeriodicalId":41296,"journal":{"name":"ABE Journal","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aesthetics of Comfort: A Third Moment in Costa Rican Histories of Tropical Architecture\",\"authors\":\"Natalia Solano-Meza\",\"doi\":\"10.4000/abe.8146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Histories of tropical architecture in Costa Rica could be constructed around three moments: the settlement of the United Fruit Company (ufco) in 1889, the visit of Otto H. Koenigsberger, director of the Department of Development and Tropical Studies during the opening of the School of Architecture of the University of Costa Rica in 1970, and finally, the constitution of a set of formal principles and images guiding the work of many architects in Costa Rica and justified by the need to provide comfort—or sensory contentment—in the tropical climate: an aesthetics of comfort. Although it is often considered a technical term, in our work, comfort operates also as a historical and aesthetic concept. Our research suggests that the aesthetics of comfort has been disseminated through journals and exhibitions since the 1990s, while also absorbing experiences from the two previous moments. Consequently, it cannot be separated from histories of colonialism, extractivism, hygiene, and interventionism. It is present, although in different forms and with different purposes, in the work of architects such as Edgar Brenes, Victor Canas and Bruno Stagno. In the media, their prominent achievements are presented as the result of responsiveness to nature, building technology, site adaptation and the ability to offer contentment. From our analysis, we claim that the aesthetics of comfort functions as a validation mechanism, one that praises technical knowledge and formal adaptation but tends to ignore histories of colonialism and knowledge production.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ABE Journal\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ABE Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4000/abe.8146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ABE Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/abe.8146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
哥斯达黎加热带建筑的历史可以围绕三个时刻来构建:联合水果公司的解决(ufco) 1889年,奥托·h·专门的访问,期间发展部门主任和热带研究的哥斯达黎加大学的建筑学院在1970年,最后,一套正式的宪法原则和图像引导的工作,许多建筑师在哥斯达黎加和合理的需要提供安慰或者感觉中的满足热带气候:舒适的美学。虽然它通常被认为是一个技术术语,但在我们的工作中,舒适也作为一个历史和美学概念运作。我们的研究表明,自20世纪90年代以来,舒适美学一直通过期刊和展览传播,同时也吸收了前两个时刻的经验。因此,它不能与殖民主义、榨取主义、卫生主义和干涉主义的历史分开。在Edgar Brenes, Victor Canas和Bruno Stagno等建筑师的作品中,它以不同的形式和不同的目的存在。在媒体上,他们的突出成就是对自然、建筑技术、场地适应性和提供满足感的能力的回应。从我们的分析中,我们声称舒适美学作为一种验证机制,它赞扬技术知识和形式适应,但往往忽略殖民主义和知识生产的历史。
Aesthetics of Comfort: A Third Moment in Costa Rican Histories of Tropical Architecture
Abstract Histories of tropical architecture in Costa Rica could be constructed around three moments: the settlement of the United Fruit Company (ufco) in 1889, the visit of Otto H. Koenigsberger, director of the Department of Development and Tropical Studies during the opening of the School of Architecture of the University of Costa Rica in 1970, and finally, the constitution of a set of formal principles and images guiding the work of many architects in Costa Rica and justified by the need to provide comfort—or sensory contentment—in the tropical climate: an aesthetics of comfort. Although it is often considered a technical term, in our work, comfort operates also as a historical and aesthetic concept. Our research suggests that the aesthetics of comfort has been disseminated through journals and exhibitions since the 1990s, while also absorbing experiences from the two previous moments. Consequently, it cannot be separated from histories of colonialism, extractivism, hygiene, and interventionism. It is present, although in different forms and with different purposes, in the work of architects such as Edgar Brenes, Victor Canas and Bruno Stagno. In the media, their prominent achievements are presented as the result of responsiveness to nature, building technology, site adaptation and the ability to offer contentment. From our analysis, we claim that the aesthetics of comfort functions as a validation mechanism, one that praises technical knowledge and formal adaptation but tends to ignore histories of colonialism and knowledge production.