克尔凯郭尔“真理即主体性”思想解读

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Quaestiones Disputatae Pub Date : 2019-03-26 DOI:10.5840/QD2019923

Michael Healy, R. Chervin

{"title":"克尔凯郭尔“真理即主体性”思想解读","authors":"Michael Healy, R. Chervin","doi":"10.5840/QD2019923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The article interprets Kierkegaard's thesis that \"truth is subjectivity,\" unfolding four possible meanings: <list list-type=\"order\"><list-item><label>1</label>the deepest kinds of knowledge can only come from lived experience;</list-item><list-item><label>2</label>self-knowledge is essential for metanoia or change;</list-item><list-item><label>3</label>if the \"how\" is right, then the \"what\" or the truth will also be given; and</list-item><list-item><label>4</label>the deepest importance of truth lies in living it.</list-item></list>These reflections are then related to personalist themes: the incarnate person as responsible, as inviolable, and as averse to coercion; the incarnate person as having a mysterious interiority, an infinite abyss of existence, and as never reducible to a mere part of a whole nor simply determined from within or without; this interiority is not isolating but opens up toward others; and freedom is not arbitrary but implies universal moral and particular religious calls.Finally, I ask whether Kierkegaard's personalism is too individualistic and does not do full justice to some of the themes here.","PeriodicalId":40384,"journal":{"name":"Quaestiones Disputatae","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interpreting Kierkegaard's Notion That \\\"Truth Is Subjectivity\\\"\",\"authors\":\"Michael Healy, R. Chervin\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/QD2019923\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:The article interprets Kierkegaard's thesis that \\\"truth is subjectivity,\\\" unfolding four possible meanings: <list list-type=\\\"order\\\"><list-item><label>1</label>the deepest kinds of knowledge can only come from lived experience;</list-item><list-item><label>2</label>self-knowledge is essential for metanoia or change;</list-item><list-item><label>3</label>if the \\\"how\\\" is right, then the \\\"what\\\" or the truth will also be given; and</list-item><list-item><label>4</label>the deepest importance of truth lies in living it.</list-item></list>These reflections are then related to personalist themes: the incarnate person as responsible, as inviolable, and as averse to coercion; the incarnate person as having a mysterious interiority, an infinite abyss of existence, and as never reducible to a mere part of a whole nor simply determined from within or without; this interiority is not isolating but opens up toward others; and freedom is not arbitrary but implies universal moral and particular religious calls.Finally, I ask whether Kierkegaard's personalism is too individualistic and does not do full justice to some of the themes here.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quaestiones Disputatae\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quaestiones Disputatae\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/QD2019923\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaestiones Disputatae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/QD2019923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:本文对克尔凯郭尔的“真理是主体性”这一命题进行了阐释，揭示了四种可能的含义:1、最深层次的知识只能来自于生活经验;2、自我认识是蜕变或变化的必要条件;3、如果“如何”是正确的，那么“是什么”或真理也将被给予;真理的最重要之处在于实践它。这些反思与个人主义主题相关:化身的人是负责任的，不可侵犯的，反对强迫的;化身的人有一个神秘的内在，一个存在的无限深渊，永远不能简化为一个整体的一部分，也不能简单地由内部或外部决定;这种内在不是孤立的，而是向他人开放的;自由不是武断的，而是意味着普遍的道德和特殊的宗教召唤。最后，我要问克尔凯郭尔的个人主义是否过于个人主义，是否没有完全公正地处理这里的一些主题。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Interpreting Kierkegaard's Notion That "Truth Is Subjectivity"

Abstract:

The article interprets Kierkegaard's thesis that "truth is subjectivity," unfolding four possible meanings: 1

the deepest kinds of knowledge can only come from lived experience;

self-knowledge is essential for metanoia or change;

if the "how" is right, then the "what" or the truth will also be given; and

the deepest importance of truth lies in living it.

These reflections are then related to personalist themes: the incarnate person as responsible, as inviolable, and as averse to coercion; the incarnate person as having a mysterious interiority, an infinite abyss of existence, and as never reducible to a mere part of a whole nor simply determined from within or without; this interiority is not isolating but opens up toward others; and freedom is not arbitrary but implies universal moral and particular religious calls.

Finally, I ask whether Kierkegaard's personalism is too individualistic and does not do full justice to some of the themes here.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊