M. Dheresa, N. Assefa, Y. Berhane, Alelmayhu Worku, Bizatu Mingiste, Yadeta Dessie
{"title":"育龄妇女的妇科发病率:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"M. Dheresa, N. Assefa, Y. Berhane, Alelmayhu Worku, Bizatu Mingiste, Yadeta Dessie","doi":"10.4172/2167-0420.1000367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Prevention against infection and dysfunction of reproductive organ including sexually transmitted \n disease is one of the three dimensions of reproductive health. Gynecological morbidities affect women’s physical \n health, sexual function, social role, psychological life and religious life. For accurate estimation of gynecological \n morbidity, population based data are considered to be gold standard. There are no global wide population studies on \n gynecological morbidities. In this paper, we aimed to determine the prevalence of gynecological morbidity among the \n reproductive age women in the world. \nMethods: Using various key words, electronics databases were searched systematically to identify observational \n studies published so far in English. Meta-analysis was made to summarize the prevalence of gynecological \n morbidity. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled prevalence. Publication bias was evaluated by \n testing for funnel plot asymmetry, Begg’s rank correlation test and Egger’s linear regression test. All statistical \n calculations were made using STATA Version 12.0 software. \nResult: Eighteen studies, at least with one outcome variable were included in the final analysis. Ten studies were \n eligible for pelvic organ prolapse, 8 were eligible for infertility, 11 for menstrual disorder, and 15 for reproductive tract \n infection. The summarized random effect prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse was 13%, infertility was 8%, \n reproductive tract infection was 38%, and menstrual disorders were 28%. The overall pooled random effect \n prevalence of gynecological morbidity was 22% (95% CI=17%-27%, I2=99.38%, p=000). The potential publication \n bias was suggested by funnel plot asymmetry. \nConclusion: The polled prevalence of overall gynecological morbidity was high. This pooled prevalence enabled \n us to conclude that the effect of gynecological morbidities is high to hamper the productivity of reproductive age \n women in the world particularly in a developing nation.","PeriodicalId":17626,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Womens Health Care","volume":"77 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gynecological Morbidity among Women in Reproductive Age: A SystematicReview and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"M. Dheresa, N. Assefa, Y. Berhane, Alelmayhu Worku, Bizatu Mingiste, Yadeta Dessie\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2167-0420.1000367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Prevention against infection and dysfunction of reproductive organ including sexually transmitted \\n disease is one of the three dimensions of reproductive health. Gynecological morbidities affect women’s physical \\n health, sexual function, social role, psychological life and religious life. For accurate estimation of gynecological \\n morbidity, population based data are considered to be gold standard. There are no global wide population studies on \\n gynecological morbidities. In this paper, we aimed to determine the prevalence of gynecological morbidity among the \\n reproductive age women in the world. \\nMethods: Using various key words, electronics databases were searched systematically to identify observational \\n studies published so far in English. Meta-analysis was made to summarize the prevalence of gynecological \\n morbidity. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled prevalence. Publication bias was evaluated by \\n testing for funnel plot asymmetry, Begg’s rank correlation test and Egger’s linear regression test. All statistical \\n calculations were made using STATA Version 12.0 software. \\nResult: Eighteen studies, at least with one outcome variable were included in the final analysis. Ten studies were \\n eligible for pelvic organ prolapse, 8 were eligible for infertility, 11 for menstrual disorder, and 15 for reproductive tract \\n infection. The summarized random effect prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse was 13%, infertility was 8%, \\n reproductive tract infection was 38%, and menstrual disorders were 28%. The overall pooled random effect \\n prevalence of gynecological morbidity was 22% (95% CI=17%-27%, I2=99.38%, p=000). The potential publication \\n bias was suggested by funnel plot asymmetry. \\nConclusion: The polled prevalence of overall gynecological morbidity was high. This pooled prevalence enabled \\n us to conclude that the effect of gynecological morbidities is high to hamper the productivity of reproductive age \\n women in the world particularly in a developing nation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Womens Health Care\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Womens Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0420.1000367\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Womens Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0420.1000367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17
摘要
背景:预防包括性传播疾病在内的生殖器官感染和功能障碍是生殖健康的三个方面之一。妇科疾病影响妇女的身体健康、性功能、社会角色、心理生活和宗教生活。为了准确估计妇科发病率,基于人口的数据被认为是金标准。目前还没有全球范围的关于妇科发病率的人口研究。在本文中,我们的目的是确定妇科发病率的育龄妇女在世界范围内。方法:采用多种关键词,系统检索电子数据库,对已发表的英文观察性研究进行检索。荟萃分析总结妇科发病率。采用随机效应模型计算合并患病率。通过漏斗图不对称检验、Begg’s秩相关检验和Egger’s线性回归检验评价发表偏倚。所有统计计算均使用STATA Version 12.0软件进行。结果:18项研究,至少有一个结局变量被纳入最终分析。10项研究纳入盆腔器官脱垂,8项研究纳入不孕症,11项研究纳入月经紊乱,15项研究纳入生殖道感染。盆腔器官脱垂的随机效应发生率为13%,不孕症发生率为8%,生殖道感染发生率为38%,月经紊乱发生率为28%。综合随机效应妇科发病率为22% (95% CI=17% ~ 27%, I2=99.38%, p=000)。漏斗图不对称提示潜在的发表偏倚。结论:该地区妇科总发病率较高。这一综合流行率使我们得出结论,妇科疾病的影响很大,阻碍了世界上育龄妇女的生产力,特别是在发展中国家。
Gynecological Morbidity among Women in Reproductive Age: A SystematicReview and Meta-Analysis
Background: Prevention against infection and dysfunction of reproductive organ including sexually transmitted
disease is one of the three dimensions of reproductive health. Gynecological morbidities affect women’s physical
health, sexual function, social role, psychological life and religious life. For accurate estimation of gynecological
morbidity, population based data are considered to be gold standard. There are no global wide population studies on
gynecological morbidities. In this paper, we aimed to determine the prevalence of gynecological morbidity among the
reproductive age women in the world.
Methods: Using various key words, electronics databases were searched systematically to identify observational
studies published so far in English. Meta-analysis was made to summarize the prevalence of gynecological
morbidity. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled prevalence. Publication bias was evaluated by
testing for funnel plot asymmetry, Begg’s rank correlation test and Egger’s linear regression test. All statistical
calculations were made using STATA Version 12.0 software.
Result: Eighteen studies, at least with one outcome variable were included in the final analysis. Ten studies were
eligible for pelvic organ prolapse, 8 were eligible for infertility, 11 for menstrual disorder, and 15 for reproductive tract
infection. The summarized random effect prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse was 13%, infertility was 8%,
reproductive tract infection was 38%, and menstrual disorders were 28%. The overall pooled random effect
prevalence of gynecological morbidity was 22% (95% CI=17%-27%, I2=99.38%, p=000). The potential publication
bias was suggested by funnel plot asymmetry.
Conclusion: The polled prevalence of overall gynecological morbidity was high. This pooled prevalence enabled
us to conclude that the effect of gynecological morbidities is high to hamper the productivity of reproductive age
women in the world particularly in a developing nation.