寻找蜘蛛女:女性在蜘蛛技术中的过去和现在的角色

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Arachnology Pub Date : 2022-06-27 DOI:10.13156/arac.2022.19.sp1.126
{"title":"寻找蜘蛛女:女性在蜘蛛技术中的过去和现在的角色","authors":"","doi":"10.13156/arac.2022.19.sp1.126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract As with many scientific disciplines, arachnology has long been male dominated. This gender bias has been changing gradually over the years, with some prominent early pioneers playing influential roles. Starting with Eliza Staveley in the mid-1800s, women pursued arachnology in a somewhat clandestine manner. The frequency with which women became involved in the study of arachnology increased considerably in the early and mid-1900s, although women were still expected to focus their responsibilities on family before any scientific pursuit, and only very rarely held any kind of academic position. Towards the latter part of the 1900s, there was a tremendous growth in certain areas of biology—notably behavioural ecology and biological control, both fields in which spiders are extremely amenable to study. With this growth came a new generation of independent women arachnologists. As the presence of women has grown in arachnology, so too has their ability to serve as mentors and role models to a younger generation of students from identities underrepresented in arachnology. Indeed, recent years have seen the student composition of meeting presenters reach close to a balanced gender composition. However, there is still considerable male gender bias in more senior positions in arachnology, including not only academic positions, but also first-authored papers, and oral presentations at meetings. Through examination of science and other STEM fields, we can better understand the barriers women face in academia. We conclude that, while we still have a way to go to achieve gender equity in arachnology, there are multiple avenues towards progress, including utilizing technology to better connect with students on a wider scale, improving our science communication, assessing hiring practices and tenure review, and increasing support, recognition and guidance given to early-career arachnologists.","PeriodicalId":38197,"journal":{"name":"Arachnology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finding spider woman: the past and present role of women in arachnology\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.13156/arac.2022.19.sp1.126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract As with many scientific disciplines, arachnology has long been male dominated. This gender bias has been changing gradually over the years, with some prominent early pioneers playing influential roles. Starting with Eliza Staveley in the mid-1800s, women pursued arachnology in a somewhat clandestine manner. The frequency with which women became involved in the study of arachnology increased considerably in the early and mid-1900s, although women were still expected to focus their responsibilities on family before any scientific pursuit, and only very rarely held any kind of academic position. Towards the latter part of the 1900s, there was a tremendous growth in certain areas of biology—notably behavioural ecology and biological control, both fields in which spiders are extremely amenable to study. With this growth came a new generation of independent women arachnologists. As the presence of women has grown in arachnology, so too has their ability to serve as mentors and role models to a younger generation of students from identities underrepresented in arachnology. Indeed, recent years have seen the student composition of meeting presenters reach close to a balanced gender composition. However, there is still considerable male gender bias in more senior positions in arachnology, including not only academic positions, but also first-authored papers, and oral presentations at meetings. Through examination of science and other STEM fields, we can better understand the barriers women face in academia. We conclude that, while we still have a way to go to achieve gender equity in arachnology, there are multiple avenues towards progress, including utilizing technology to better connect with students on a wider scale, improving our science communication, assessing hiring practices and tenure review, and increasing support, recognition and guidance given to early-career arachnologists.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arachnology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arachnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13156/arac.2022.19.sp1.126\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arachnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13156/arac.2022.19.sp1.126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

与许多科学学科一样,机械学长期以来一直是男性主导的。多年来,这种性别偏见一直在逐渐改变,一些杰出的早期先驱发挥了重要作用。从19世纪中期的伊丽莎·斯塔维利(Eliza Staveley)开始,女性以某种秘密的方式追求机械技术。在20世纪早期和中期,妇女参与机械技术研究的频率大大增加,尽管妇女仍然被期望在任何科学追求之前把责任集中在家庭上,而且很少有妇女担任任何学术职务。在20世纪后期,生物学的某些领域有了巨大的发展——尤其是行为生态学和生物控制,这两个领域都非常适合研究蜘蛛。随着这一增长,出现了新一代独立的女性蜘蛛学家。随着女性在机械技术领域的出现越来越多,她们作为导师和榜样的能力也越来越强,这些学生来自机械技术领域未被充分代表的群体。事实上,近年来,会议主持人的学生组成已经接近于性别平衡。然而,在更高级的机械技术职位上,不仅包括学术职位,还包括第一作者论文和会议口头报告,仍然存在相当大的男性性别偏见。通过对科学和其他STEM领域的考察,我们可以更好地理解女性在学术界面临的障碍。我们得出的结论是,虽然我们在实现机械学领域的性别平等方面还有很长的路要走,但有多种途径可以取得进展,包括利用技术在更大范围内更好地与学生联系,改善我们的科学交流,评估招聘实践和终身教职审查,以及增加对早期机械学工作者的支持、认可和指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Finding spider woman: the past and present role of women in arachnology
Abstract As with many scientific disciplines, arachnology has long been male dominated. This gender bias has been changing gradually over the years, with some prominent early pioneers playing influential roles. Starting with Eliza Staveley in the mid-1800s, women pursued arachnology in a somewhat clandestine manner. The frequency with which women became involved in the study of arachnology increased considerably in the early and mid-1900s, although women were still expected to focus their responsibilities on family before any scientific pursuit, and only very rarely held any kind of academic position. Towards the latter part of the 1900s, there was a tremendous growth in certain areas of biology—notably behavioural ecology and biological control, both fields in which spiders are extremely amenable to study. With this growth came a new generation of independent women arachnologists. As the presence of women has grown in arachnology, so too has their ability to serve as mentors and role models to a younger generation of students from identities underrepresented in arachnology. Indeed, recent years have seen the student composition of meeting presenters reach close to a balanced gender composition. However, there is still considerable male gender bias in more senior positions in arachnology, including not only academic positions, but also first-authored papers, and oral presentations at meetings. Through examination of science and other STEM fields, we can better understand the barriers women face in academia. We conclude that, while we still have a way to go to achieve gender equity in arachnology, there are multiple avenues towards progress, including utilizing technology to better connect with students on a wider scale, improving our science communication, assessing hiring practices and tenure review, and increasing support, recognition and guidance given to early-career arachnologists.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arachnology
Arachnology Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Insect Science
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊最新文献
New data on species of Zodariellum Andreeva & Tyshchenko, 1968 (Araneae: Zodariidae) in Central Asia Running Crab Spiders (Araneae: Philodromidae) from Colombia: New Species and Records A new genus of lyrate curtain-web spiders (Araneae: Mygalomorphae: Dipluridae) from southeastern Brazil, with two new species and revalidation of a formerly described species A new Prosoponoides Millidge & Russell-Smith, 1992 from Shaanxi Province, China (Araneae: Linyphiidae) On two little-known Gnaphosidae from North Africa (Araneae)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1