项目评估中的混合方法设计导论

Elizabeth A. Prosek
{"title":"项目评估中的混合方法设计导论","authors":"Elizabeth A. Prosek","doi":"10.1080/21501378.2019.1590688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Counseling researchers possess a distinct skill set that lends itself to program evaluation of community-based treatment programs. Specifically, using a mixed-methods approach to program evaluation could be beneficial to meet the outcome reporting requirements to satisfy grant sponsors, as well as provide stakeholders with information needed for program improvement. The purpose of this article is to provide an overall framework of program evaluation and application of mixed method design in evaluation. Additionally, the ethical and cultural considerations of program evaluation are presented. Finally, a case example of an evaluation with a veterans’ treatment court is used throughout, concluding with challenges that might be faced by program evaluators working in community partnerships.","PeriodicalId":37884,"journal":{"name":"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation","volume":"15 1","pages":"60 - 70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Introduction to Mixed Methods Design in Program Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth A. Prosek\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21501378.2019.1590688\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Counseling researchers possess a distinct skill set that lends itself to program evaluation of community-based treatment programs. Specifically, using a mixed-methods approach to program evaluation could be beneficial to meet the outcome reporting requirements to satisfy grant sponsors, as well as provide stakeholders with information needed for program improvement. The purpose of this article is to provide an overall framework of program evaluation and application of mixed method design in evaluation. Additionally, the ethical and cultural considerations of program evaluation are presented. Finally, a case example of an evaluation with a veterans’ treatment court is used throughout, concluding with challenges that might be faced by program evaluators working in community partnerships.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"60 - 70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21501378.2019.1590688\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21501378.2019.1590688","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

咨询研究人员拥有独特的技能,使其能够对社区治疗方案进行评估。具体来说,使用混合方法进行项目评估可能有利于满足结果报告要求,以满足资助方的要求,并为利益相关者提供项目改进所需的信息。本文的目的是提供一个项目评估的总体框架和混合方法设计在评估中的应用。此外,提出了项目评估的伦理和文化考虑。最后,本书以退伍军人治疗法庭评估的案例为例,总结了在社区合作伙伴关系中工作的项目评估人员可能面临的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Introduction to Mixed Methods Design in Program Evaluation
Abstract Counseling researchers possess a distinct skill set that lends itself to program evaluation of community-based treatment programs. Specifically, using a mixed-methods approach to program evaluation could be beneficial to meet the outcome reporting requirements to satisfy grant sponsors, as well as provide stakeholders with information needed for program improvement. The purpose of this article is to provide an overall framework of program evaluation and application of mixed method design in evaluation. Additionally, the ethical and cultural considerations of program evaluation are presented. Finally, a case example of an evaluation with a veterans’ treatment court is used throughout, concluding with challenges that might be faced by program evaluators working in community partnerships.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation
Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation (CORE) provides counselor educators, researchers, educators, and other mental health practitioners with outcome research and program evaluation practices for work with individuals across the lifespan. It addresses topics such as: treatment efficacy, clinical diagnosis, program evaluation, research design, outcome measure reviews. This journal also serves to address ethical, legal, and cultural concerns in the assessment of dependent variables, implementation of clinical interventions, and outcome research. Manuscripts typically fall into one of the following categories: Counseling Outcome Research: Treatment efficacy and effectiveness of mental health, school, addictions, rehabilitation, family, and college counseling interventions across the lifespan as reported in clinical trials, single-case research designs, single-group designs, and multi- or mixed-method designs.
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Emotion Focused Group Therapy Using Quality Indicators Scoping Review Methodology: A Practical Guide for Counseling Researchers Creating Researcher-Practitioner Partnerships in Counseling: Lessons Learned A Systematic Review of Data Analysis Decisions in Counseling Single-Case Research Designs to Inform Best Practices Effectiveness of DBT Partial Hospitalization Program for Adolescents and Young Adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1