在初级保健队列中识别良性前列腺增大/梗阻男性的三项筛查工具的评估。

A. Tubaro, M. Niero, B. Adalig, Z. Lulic, Janet Plastino, Carie L. Kimbrough, M. Manyak
{"title":"在初级保健队列中识别良性前列腺增大/梗阻男性的三项筛查工具的评估。","authors":"A. Tubaro, M. Niero, B. Adalig, Z. Lulic, Janet Plastino, Carie L. Kimbrough, M. Manyak","doi":"10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03834-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nBenign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), a progressive condition and common cause of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), is underdiagnosed in primary care, impacting patient outcomes. Here, we evaluate the utility of a BPH screening tool in general practice, to identify men confirmed to have BPH after urologist assessment of diagnostic test results.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA 3-item questionnaire was developed to discriminate between LUTS due to BPH versus other conditions, and was translated and validated cross-culturally. Its utility was assessed in a cohort study (FDC116114/NCT02757963) conducted in 47 centers across France, Germany, Italy, Russia, and Spain. The study enrolled men ≥50 years of age presenting to general practice clinics with a score of ≥3 on the BPH screening tool or ≥8 on the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). In total, 561 men completed the study. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a urologist-confirmed BPH diagnosis among those with a positive result on the BPH screening tool (score ≥3) and serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) ≥2ng/mL.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe primary endpoint was fulfilled; 88.3% (95% CI: 84.9, 91.2) of patients had urologistconfirmed BPH diagnoses among those with positive results on the BPH screening tool and serum PSA ≥2ng/mL, similar to the proportion seen with IPSS ≥8 and serum PSA ≥2ng/mL (87.7%; 95% CI 84.6, 90.4).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe BPH screening tool, in conjunction with serum PSA, demonstrated adequate predictive value by allowing general practitioners to quickly screen men presenting with different medical conditions but identified as having urological symptoms.","PeriodicalId":49015,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a 3-item screening tool to identify men with benign prostatic enlargement/obstruction in a primary care cohort.\",\"authors\":\"A. Tubaro, M. Niero, B. Adalig, Z. Lulic, Janet Plastino, Carie L. Kimbrough, M. Manyak\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03834-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nBenign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), a progressive condition and common cause of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), is underdiagnosed in primary care, impacting patient outcomes. Here, we evaluate the utility of a BPH screening tool in general practice, to identify men confirmed to have BPH after urologist assessment of diagnostic test results.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nA 3-item questionnaire was developed to discriminate between LUTS due to BPH versus other conditions, and was translated and validated cross-culturally. Its utility was assessed in a cohort study (FDC116114/NCT02757963) conducted in 47 centers across France, Germany, Italy, Russia, and Spain. The study enrolled men ≥50 years of age presenting to general practice clinics with a score of ≥3 on the BPH screening tool or ≥8 on the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). In total, 561 men completed the study. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a urologist-confirmed BPH diagnosis among those with a positive result on the BPH screening tool (score ≥3) and serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) ≥2ng/mL.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nThe primary endpoint was fulfilled; 88.3% (95% CI: 84.9, 91.2) of patients had urologistconfirmed BPH diagnoses among those with positive results on the BPH screening tool and serum PSA ≥2ng/mL, similar to the proportion seen with IPSS ≥8 and serum PSA ≥2ng/mL (87.7%; 95% CI 84.6, 90.4).\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nThe BPH screening tool, in conjunction with serum PSA, demonstrated adequate predictive value by allowing general practitioners to quickly screen men presenting with different medical conditions but identified as having urological symptoms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03834-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03834-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:良性前列腺增生(BPH)是一种进行性疾病,也是下尿路症状(LUTS)的常见原因,在初级保健中诊断不足,影响患者的预后。在这里,我们评估了BPH筛查工具在一般实践中的效用,以识别经泌尿科医生评估诊断测试结果后确诊患有BPH的男性。方法采用3项问卷对BPH所致LUTS与其他情况下LUTS进行区分,并进行跨文化翻译和验证。在法国、德国、意大利、俄罗斯和西班牙的47个中心进行的队列研究(FDC116114/NCT02757963)中评估了其效用。该研究招募了年龄≥50岁,在全科诊所就诊,BPH筛查工具评分≥3分或国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)评分≥8分的男性。总共有561名男性完成了这项研究。主要终点是泌尿科医生确诊的BPH诊断患者在BPH筛查工具(评分≥3)和血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)≥2ng/mL阳性结果患者中所占的比例。结果主要终点达到;在BPH筛查工具阳性且血清PSA≥2ng/mL的患者中,有88.3% (95% CI: 84.9, 91.2)的患者被泌尿科医生确诊为BPH,与IPSS≥8和血清PSA≥2ng/mL的患者比例相似(87.7%;95% ci 84.6, 90.4)。结论BPH筛查工具,结合血清PSA,显示出足够的预测价值,允许全科医生快速筛查出现不同医疗条件但确定有泌尿系统症状的男性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of a 3-item screening tool to identify men with benign prostatic enlargement/obstruction in a primary care cohort.
BACKGROUND Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), a progressive condition and common cause of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), is underdiagnosed in primary care, impacting patient outcomes. Here, we evaluate the utility of a BPH screening tool in general practice, to identify men confirmed to have BPH after urologist assessment of diagnostic test results. METHODS A 3-item questionnaire was developed to discriminate between LUTS due to BPH versus other conditions, and was translated and validated cross-culturally. Its utility was assessed in a cohort study (FDC116114/NCT02757963) conducted in 47 centers across France, Germany, Italy, Russia, and Spain. The study enrolled men ≥50 years of age presenting to general practice clinics with a score of ≥3 on the BPH screening tool or ≥8 on the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). In total, 561 men completed the study. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a urologist-confirmed BPH diagnosis among those with a positive result on the BPH screening tool (score ≥3) and serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) ≥2ng/mL. RESULTS The primary endpoint was fulfilled; 88.3% (95% CI: 84.9, 91.2) of patients had urologistconfirmed BPH diagnoses among those with positive results on the BPH screening tool and serum PSA ≥2ng/mL, similar to the proportion seen with IPSS ≥8 and serum PSA ≥2ng/mL (87.7%; 95% CI 84.6, 90.4). CONCLUSIONS The BPH screening tool, in conjunction with serum PSA, demonstrated adequate predictive value by allowing general practitioners to quickly screen men presenting with different medical conditions but identified as having urological symptoms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica publishes scientific papers on nephrology and urology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of Minerva opinion editorials, editorial comments, original articles, video illustrated articles, review articles and letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Real-life data on long-term follow-up of patients successfully treated with percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS). Identifying tumor-related risk factors for simultaneous adrenalectomy in patients with cT1 - cT2 kidney cancer during robotic assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. A systematic review of nerve-sparing surgery for high-risk prostate cancer. Comparison of outcomes between laparoscopic and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors (RENAL score ≥ 7 or maximum tumor size > 4cm): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Totally intracorporeal robotic ileal ureter replacement: focus on surgical technique and outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1