{"title":"粉煤灰对土壤微生物活性的影响","authors":"M.H. Wong, J.W.C. Wong","doi":"10.1016/0143-1471(86)90080-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Fly ash was added to a sandy soil and a sandy loam to study its effects on soil microbial respiration. Microbial respiration was reduced with increasing fly ash treatments in the sandy soil, whereas in the sandy loam, a significant depression was only recorded at the highest ash addition for both total and cumulative carbon dioxide evolved. Total carbon dioxide release was actually increased by 3% and 6% ash amendment on the sandy loam. A highly negative correlation was found between respiration and ash treatment for the sandy soil (<em>r</em> = −0·9904, <em>p</em> < 0·005), but not for the sandy loam. Ecological dose 50% (EcD<sub>50</sub>) values of the sandy soil were smaller than that of the sandy loam for each period. The reasons for this are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100483,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Pollution Series A, Ecological and Biological","volume":"40 2","pages":"Pages 127-144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0143-1471(86)90080-2","citationCount":"128","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of fly ash on soil microbial activity\",\"authors\":\"M.H. Wong, J.W.C. Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0143-1471(86)90080-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Fly ash was added to a sandy soil and a sandy loam to study its effects on soil microbial respiration. Microbial respiration was reduced with increasing fly ash treatments in the sandy soil, whereas in the sandy loam, a significant depression was only recorded at the highest ash addition for both total and cumulative carbon dioxide evolved. Total carbon dioxide release was actually increased by 3% and 6% ash amendment on the sandy loam. A highly negative correlation was found between respiration and ash treatment for the sandy soil (<em>r</em> = −0·9904, <em>p</em> < 0·005), but not for the sandy loam. Ecological dose 50% (EcD<sub>50</sub>) values of the sandy soil were smaller than that of the sandy loam for each period. The reasons for this are discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Pollution Series A, Ecological and Biological\",\"volume\":\"40 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 127-144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0143-1471(86)90080-2\",\"citationCount\":\"128\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Pollution Series A, Ecological and Biological\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0143147186900802\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Pollution Series A, Ecological and Biological","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0143147186900802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fly ash was added to a sandy soil and a sandy loam to study its effects on soil microbial respiration. Microbial respiration was reduced with increasing fly ash treatments in the sandy soil, whereas in the sandy loam, a significant depression was only recorded at the highest ash addition for both total and cumulative carbon dioxide evolved. Total carbon dioxide release was actually increased by 3% and 6% ash amendment on the sandy loam. A highly negative correlation was found between respiration and ash treatment for the sandy soil (r = −0·9904, p < 0·005), but not for the sandy loam. Ecological dose 50% (EcD50) values of the sandy soil were smaller than that of the sandy loam for each period. The reasons for this are discussed.