粉煤灰对土壤微生物活性的影响

M.H. Wong, J.W.C. Wong
{"title":"粉煤灰对土壤微生物活性的影响","authors":"M.H. Wong,&nbsp;J.W.C. Wong","doi":"10.1016/0143-1471(86)90080-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Fly ash was added to a sandy soil and a sandy loam to study its effects on soil microbial respiration. Microbial respiration was reduced with increasing fly ash treatments in the sandy soil, whereas in the sandy loam, a significant depression was only recorded at the highest ash addition for both total and cumulative carbon dioxide evolved. Total carbon dioxide release was actually increased by 3% and 6% ash amendment on the sandy loam. A highly negative correlation was found between respiration and ash treatment for the sandy soil (<em>r</em> = −0·9904, <em>p</em> &lt; 0·005), but not for the sandy loam. Ecological dose 50% (EcD<sub>50</sub>) values of the sandy soil were smaller than that of the sandy loam for each period. The reasons for this are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100483,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Pollution Series A, Ecological and Biological","volume":"40 2","pages":"Pages 127-144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0143-1471(86)90080-2","citationCount":"128","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of fly ash on soil microbial activity\",\"authors\":\"M.H. Wong,&nbsp;J.W.C. Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0143-1471(86)90080-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Fly ash was added to a sandy soil and a sandy loam to study its effects on soil microbial respiration. Microbial respiration was reduced with increasing fly ash treatments in the sandy soil, whereas in the sandy loam, a significant depression was only recorded at the highest ash addition for both total and cumulative carbon dioxide evolved. Total carbon dioxide release was actually increased by 3% and 6% ash amendment on the sandy loam. A highly negative correlation was found between respiration and ash treatment for the sandy soil (<em>r</em> = −0·9904, <em>p</em> &lt; 0·005), but not for the sandy loam. Ecological dose 50% (EcD<sub>50</sub>) values of the sandy soil were smaller than that of the sandy loam for each period. The reasons for this are discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Pollution Series A, Ecological and Biological\",\"volume\":\"40 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 127-144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0143-1471(86)90080-2\",\"citationCount\":\"128\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Pollution Series A, Ecological and Biological\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0143147186900802\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Pollution Series A, Ecological and Biological","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0143147186900802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 128

摘要

在砂质土和砂壤土中添加粉煤灰,研究粉煤灰对土壤微生物呼吸的影响。砂质土壤微生物呼吸随着粉煤灰处理的增加而减少,而在砂壤土中,只有在粉煤灰添加量最高时,总二氧化碳和累积二氧化碳含量才会显著降低。总二氧化碳释放量实际上增加了3%和6%的灰修正砂壤土。沙质土壤呼吸与灰分处理呈高度负相关(r = - 0·9904,p <0.005),但砂壤土不适用。各时期砂质土的生态剂量50% (EcD50)均小于砂质壤土。对其原因进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of fly ash on soil microbial activity

Fly ash was added to a sandy soil and a sandy loam to study its effects on soil microbial respiration. Microbial respiration was reduced with increasing fly ash treatments in the sandy soil, whereas in the sandy loam, a significant depression was only recorded at the highest ash addition for both total and cumulative carbon dioxide evolved. Total carbon dioxide release was actually increased by 3% and 6% ash amendment on the sandy loam. A highly negative correlation was found between respiration and ash treatment for the sandy soil (r = −0·9904, p < 0·005), but not for the sandy loam. Ecological dose 50% (EcD50) values of the sandy soil were smaller than that of the sandy loam for each period. The reasons for this are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Announcements Announcements Errata Editorial Board Announcement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1