葡萄球菌的耐药性

T. Sawai, H. Hashimoto, S. Mitsuhashi, S. Yamagishi
{"title":"葡萄球菌的耐药性","authors":"T. Sawai, H. Hashimoto, S. Mitsuhashi, S. Yamagishi","doi":"10.1111/J.1348-0421.1967.TB00335.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to genetic studies of the inducible resistance to macrolide antibiotics; erythromycin (EM), oleandomycin (OM), leucomycin (LM), spiramycin (SP), in Staphylococcus aureus, it was found that there are two types of cross-resistance; resistance to EM and to both EM and OM. In EM-resistant strains, EM is an active inducer, while both EM and OM are the inducers in those strains resistant to both EM and OM. However, the induced populations of both strains acquired high resistance (800 μg/ml or more) to all macrolide antibiotics and to lincomycin. The resistance of induced cells was lost when grown in the absence of inducers. From a strain MS537, in which EM is an inducer, a mutant MS537-1 was obtained on the plate containing OM. In strain MS537-1, OM, in addition to EM, has become an active inducer for macrolide resistance. When MS537 and MS537-1 were cultured on the plate containing LM, mutants MS537-2 and MS537-3 were obtained, respectively. They were found to be highly resistant to all macrolide antibiotics and to lincomycin, and their resistance was not inducible but constitutive. According to transductional analysis, it was found that the loci concerned with induction for macrolide resistance and those governing cross-resistance to macrolide antibiotics were co-transducible, both loci not being separated by transduction. The constitutive resistance to macrolide antibiotics and to lincomycin in strains MS537-2 and MS537-3, was also co-transducible, suggesting that the resistance to macrolide antibiotics and to lincomycin are determined by a gene or by a cluster of genes in the cocci.","PeriodicalId":14559,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of microbiology","volume":"17 1","pages":"179-188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1967-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drug Resistance of Staphylococci\",\"authors\":\"T. Sawai, H. Hashimoto, S. Mitsuhashi, S. Yamagishi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/J.1348-0421.1967.TB00335.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"According to genetic studies of the inducible resistance to macrolide antibiotics; erythromycin (EM), oleandomycin (OM), leucomycin (LM), spiramycin (SP), in Staphylococcus aureus, it was found that there are two types of cross-resistance; resistance to EM and to both EM and OM. In EM-resistant strains, EM is an active inducer, while both EM and OM are the inducers in those strains resistant to both EM and OM. However, the induced populations of both strains acquired high resistance (800 μg/ml or more) to all macrolide antibiotics and to lincomycin. The resistance of induced cells was lost when grown in the absence of inducers. From a strain MS537, in which EM is an inducer, a mutant MS537-1 was obtained on the plate containing OM. In strain MS537-1, OM, in addition to EM, has become an active inducer for macrolide resistance. When MS537 and MS537-1 were cultured on the plate containing LM, mutants MS537-2 and MS537-3 were obtained, respectively. They were found to be highly resistant to all macrolide antibiotics and to lincomycin, and their resistance was not inducible but constitutive. According to transductional analysis, it was found that the loci concerned with induction for macrolide resistance and those governing cross-resistance to macrolide antibiotics were co-transducible, both loci not being separated by transduction. The constitutive resistance to macrolide antibiotics and to lincomycin in strains MS537-2 and MS537-3, was also co-transducible, suggesting that the resistance to macrolide antibiotics and to lincomycin are determined by a gene or by a cluster of genes in the cocci.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese journal of microbiology\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"179-188\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1967-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"32\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese journal of microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1348-0421.1967.TB00335.X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1348-0421.1967.TB00335.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

摘要

根据大环内酯类抗生素诱导耐药的遗传研究;红霉素(EM)、夹竹桃霉素(OM)、白霉素(LM)、螺旋霉素(SP),在金黄色葡萄球菌中发现有两种类型的交叉耐药;对电磁和电磁都有抵抗力。在耐EM菌株中,EM是一种活性诱导剂,而在耐EM和OM菌株中,EM和OM都是诱导剂。然而,两种菌株的诱导群体对所有大环内酯类抗生素和林可霉素均产生了高耐药性(800 μg/ml以上)。在没有诱导剂的情况下,诱导细胞的抗性丧失。从以EM为诱导剂的菌株MS537中,在含有OM的平板上获得了突变体MS537-1。在菌株MS537-1中,除EM外,OM已成为大环内酯类药物耐药性的主动诱导剂。将MS537和MS537-1分别培养在LM培养皿上,得到突变体MS537-2和MS537-3。对所有大环内酯类抗生素和林可霉素均有高度耐药,耐药不是诱导性的,而是组成性的。通过转导分析发现,诱导大环内酯类抗生素耐药的基因座和控制大环内酯类抗生素交叉耐药的基因座是共转导的,两个基因座不被转导分开。菌株MS537-2和MS537-3对大环内酯类抗生素和林可霉素的组成性耐药也是共转导的,表明对大环内酯类抗生素和林可霉素的耐药是由球菌中的一个基因或一个基因簇决定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Drug Resistance of Staphylococci
According to genetic studies of the inducible resistance to macrolide antibiotics; erythromycin (EM), oleandomycin (OM), leucomycin (LM), spiramycin (SP), in Staphylococcus aureus, it was found that there are two types of cross-resistance; resistance to EM and to both EM and OM. In EM-resistant strains, EM is an active inducer, while both EM and OM are the inducers in those strains resistant to both EM and OM. However, the induced populations of both strains acquired high resistance (800 μg/ml or more) to all macrolide antibiotics and to lincomycin. The resistance of induced cells was lost when grown in the absence of inducers. From a strain MS537, in which EM is an inducer, a mutant MS537-1 was obtained on the plate containing OM. In strain MS537-1, OM, in addition to EM, has become an active inducer for macrolide resistance. When MS537 and MS537-1 were cultured on the plate containing LM, mutants MS537-2 and MS537-3 were obtained, respectively. They were found to be highly resistant to all macrolide antibiotics and to lincomycin, and their resistance was not inducible but constitutive. According to transductional analysis, it was found that the loci concerned with induction for macrolide resistance and those governing cross-resistance to macrolide antibiotics were co-transducible, both loci not being separated by transduction. The constitutive resistance to macrolide antibiotics and to lincomycin in strains MS537-2 and MS537-3, was also co-transducible, suggesting that the resistance to macrolide antibiotics and to lincomycin are determined by a gene or by a cluster of genes in the cocci.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A 'photochromogenic' variety of Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex. Mouse virulent strain of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Relation of antiphagocytic activity to the protection-inducing antigen. Mouse hepatitis virus (MHV-2). Plaque assay and propagation in mouse cell line DBT cells. Drug resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Induction of macrolide resistance by erythromycin, oleandomycin and their derivatives. Adjuvant action of capsular polysaccharide of Klebsiella pneumoniae on antibody response. IV. The roles of antigen and adjuvant for induction of primary and secondary antibody responses and for development of immunological memory to bovine serum albumin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1