IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY JAHRBUCHER FUR GESCHICHTE OSTEUROPAS Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.25162/JGO-2018-0009
J. Raspe
{"title":"Nation wider Willen: Weißrussland in der Sowjetunion, 1921–1931. Belorussia in the Soviet Union, 1921–1931","authors":"J. Raspe","doi":"10.25162/JGO-2018-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Western historiography, the Soviet natsionalizatsiia and korenizatsiia programmes of the 1920s have usually been interpreted in one of two ways: either as a deliberate deception and exploitation of non-Russian national sentiments aimed at their ultimate overcoming or as an experiment which eventually failed due to its own success. In the case of Soviet Belorussia, neither of these two explanations applies. On the contrary, this article argues that Belarusisation was abandoned for its lack of success. Designed to win over the local population and thus ensure Soviet rule in the Western borderland, Belarusisation ultimately failed to mobilise people through preconceived national categories. In daily use, many Belarusians and Jews preferred the Russian language, which offered assimilation and upward mobility, to the languages they had been assigned by the Communist Party. Modernisation and Belarusisation proved to be mutually exclusive: The large-scale influx of Belarusian peasants to the towns did not lead to the emergence of a distinct Belarusian urban culture but rather to their rapid Russification. Besides, most national minorities were anxious not to become second-class citizens, and therefore, despite party assurances to the contrary, suspicious of Belarusisation. Ultimately, the nation-building campaign run counter to the Sovietisation of the society. When the first Five-Year Plan led to a paradigm shift in Soviet policy in the late 1920s, Belarusisation gradually came to a halt and its intellectual proponents were removed from power.","PeriodicalId":54097,"journal":{"name":"JAHRBUCHER FUR GESCHICHTE OSTEUROPAS","volume":"4 1","pages":"218-244"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAHRBUCHER FUR GESCHICHTE OSTEUROPAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25162/JGO-2018-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在西方史学中,20世纪20年代的苏联民族化和民族化计划通常被解释为两种方式之一:要么是故意欺骗和利用非俄罗斯民族的情绪,目的是最终克服他们,要么是由于自己的成功而最终失败的实验。就苏联时期的白俄罗斯而言,这两种解释都不适用。相反,这篇文章认为,白俄罗斯化因其缺乏成功而被放弃。白俄罗斯化旨在赢得当地居民的支持,从而确保苏联在西部边境的统治,但最终未能通过先入为主的民族分类来动员人民。在日常生活中,许多白俄罗斯人和犹太人更喜欢俄语,因为俄语有助于同化和向上流动,而不是共产党分配给他们的语言。现代化和白俄罗斯化被证明是相互排斥的:大量白俄罗斯农民涌入城镇并没有导致独特的白俄罗斯城市文化的出现,而是导致了他们的迅速俄罗斯化。此外,大多数少数民族都担心自己不会成为二等公民,因此,尽管政党做出了相反的保证,但他们对白俄罗斯化持怀疑态度。最终,国家建设运动与社会的苏维埃化背道而驰。当第一个五年计划在20世纪20年代末导致苏联政策的范式转变时,白俄罗斯化逐渐停止,其知识分子支持者被赶下台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nation wider Willen: Weißrussland in der Sowjetunion, 1921–1931. Belorussia in the Soviet Union, 1921–1931
In Western historiography, the Soviet natsionalizatsiia and korenizatsiia programmes of the 1920s have usually been interpreted in one of two ways: either as a deliberate deception and exploitation of non-Russian national sentiments aimed at their ultimate overcoming or as an experiment which eventually failed due to its own success. In the case of Soviet Belorussia, neither of these two explanations applies. On the contrary, this article argues that Belarusisation was abandoned for its lack of success. Designed to win over the local population and thus ensure Soviet rule in the Western borderland, Belarusisation ultimately failed to mobilise people through preconceived national categories. In daily use, many Belarusians and Jews preferred the Russian language, which offered assimilation and upward mobility, to the languages they had been assigned by the Communist Party. Modernisation and Belarusisation proved to be mutually exclusive: The large-scale influx of Belarusian peasants to the towns did not lead to the emergence of a distinct Belarusian urban culture but rather to their rapid Russification. Besides, most national minorities were anxious not to become second-class citizens, and therefore, despite party assurances to the contrary, suspicious of Belarusisation. Ultimately, the nation-building campaign run counter to the Sovietisation of the society. When the first Five-Year Plan led to a paradigm shift in Soviet policy in the late 1920s, Belarusisation gradually came to a halt and its intellectual proponents were removed from power.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Die Auswanderungsaffäre von 1913/14, oder: Kapeller im Kriminal Der Tschernobyl-Reaktor RBMK Truppenzählen und Nationsbildung Zum Wohle der Stadt – im Dienste der Nation Der kasachische Chan Žangir und sein Projekt einer russländischen Zivilisierungsmission
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1