“我亲爱的氯仿”。昆士兰殖民地对生育的态度:个案研究。

H. Woolcock, M. Thearle, K. Saunders
{"title":"“我亲爱的氯仿”。昆士兰殖民地对生育的态度:个案研究。","authors":"H. Woolcock, M. Thearle, K. Saunders","doi":"10.1093/SHM/10.3.437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1847 the anaesthetic and analgesic properties of chloroform were discovered. This technology generated a new era for midwifery: mothers could be relieved of pain in childbirth. The introduction of chloroform for childbirth saw increasing medical dominance in obstetrics, traditionally in the hands of the midwife. At the same time the use of chloroform sparked a medical and moral controversy which lasted for several decades. On the one hand women were destined by the 'curse of Eve' to experience pain during childbirth; on the other, medical humanitarians and practitioners believed that there were technical and moral reasons for alleviating pain in childbirth. In concentrating on the debate historians have largely ignored the reactions of mothers to the introduction of the technology. This paper explores changing attitudes to childbearing within the context of colonial Queensland society, 1860-90, by examining the correspondence of an upper-class mother. Her education and liberal outlook, and a certain ambivalence towards motherhood, all influenced her attitude to the use of chloroform and the process of childbirth.","PeriodicalId":68213,"journal":{"name":"医疗社会史研究","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'My beloved chloroform'. Attitudes to childbearing in colonial Queensland: a case study.\",\"authors\":\"H. Woolcock, M. Thearle, K. Saunders\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/SHM/10.3.437\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1847 the anaesthetic and analgesic properties of chloroform were discovered. This technology generated a new era for midwifery: mothers could be relieved of pain in childbirth. The introduction of chloroform for childbirth saw increasing medical dominance in obstetrics, traditionally in the hands of the midwife. At the same time the use of chloroform sparked a medical and moral controversy which lasted for several decades. On the one hand women were destined by the 'curse of Eve' to experience pain during childbirth; on the other, medical humanitarians and practitioners believed that there were technical and moral reasons for alleviating pain in childbirth. In concentrating on the debate historians have largely ignored the reactions of mothers to the introduction of the technology. This paper explores changing attitudes to childbearing within the context of colonial Queensland society, 1860-90, by examining the correspondence of an upper-class mother. Her education and liberal outlook, and a certain ambivalence towards motherhood, all influenced her attitude to the use of chloroform and the process of childbirth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":68213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"医疗社会史研究\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"医疗社会史研究\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/SHM/10.3.437\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"医疗社会史研究","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/SHM/10.3.437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

1847年,氯仿的麻醉和镇痛特性被发现。这项技术开创了助产学的新纪元:母亲们可以从分娩的痛苦中解脱。氯仿用于分娩的引入,使传统上由助产士掌握的产科的医疗优势日益增强。与此同时,氯仿的使用引发了持续了几十年的医学和道德争议。一方面,女性被“夏娃的诅咒”注定要在分娩时经历痛苦;另一方面,医疗人道主义者和从业人员认为,减轻分娩疼痛有技术和道德上的原因。历史学家把注意力集中在争论上,在很大程度上忽略了母亲们对这项技术引入的反应。本文通过研究一位上层阶级母亲的信件,探讨了1860-90年殖民昆士兰社会背景下对生育的态度变化。她所受的教育和自由主义的观点,以及对母亲的某种矛盾心理,都影响了她对使用氯仿和分娩过程的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
'My beloved chloroform'. Attitudes to childbearing in colonial Queensland: a case study.
In 1847 the anaesthetic and analgesic properties of chloroform were discovered. This technology generated a new era for midwifery: mothers could be relieved of pain in childbirth. The introduction of chloroform for childbirth saw increasing medical dominance in obstetrics, traditionally in the hands of the midwife. At the same time the use of chloroform sparked a medical and moral controversy which lasted for several decades. On the one hand women were destined by the 'curse of Eve' to experience pain during childbirth; on the other, medical humanitarians and practitioners believed that there were technical and moral reasons for alleviating pain in childbirth. In concentrating on the debate historians have largely ignored the reactions of mothers to the introduction of the technology. This paper explores changing attitudes to childbearing within the context of colonial Queensland society, 1860-90, by examining the correspondence of an upper-class mother. Her education and liberal outlook, and a certain ambivalence towards motherhood, all influenced her attitude to the use of chloroform and the process of childbirth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
140
期刊最新文献
Erratum: The 'Miracle of Childbirth': the Portrayal of Parturient Women in Medieval Miracle Narratives. Erratum: Beyond the Medical Text: Health and Illness in Early Medieval Italian Sources. Review: A Social History of Psychology The Chinese Medicine in Contemporary China: Plurality and Synthesis Medical education at St Bartholomew's hospital 1123-1995
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1