论贝茨邮票的物质符号学

A. L. Kaljund
{"title":"论贝茨邮票的物质符号学","authors":"A. L. Kaljund","doi":"10.3167/JLA.2018.020204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ethnographic studies of legal materiality and the bureaucratic\nmundanities of law often juxtapose their richly empirical approach to\nthe material assemblages of law with the ‘grand talk’ and conceptual\nabstractions of law. This article considers the intersection of formal legal\ndiscourse and the mundanity of bureaucratic practice through an examination\nof two judicial opinions concerning the legal significance of the\nBates number, a sequential digit inscribed onto documents produced in\nUS pretrial discovery. Through this analysis, the article both illustrates the\nBates stamp’s role in the material constitution of law, and offers a reminder\nthat the stories law tells about its own materiality can offer insights into,\nand enact and extend, the sociolegal agency of bureaucratic tools.","PeriodicalId":34676,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Anthropology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Material Semiotics of the Bates Stamp\",\"authors\":\"A. L. Kaljund\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/JLA.2018.020204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ethnographic studies of legal materiality and the bureaucratic\\nmundanities of law often juxtapose their richly empirical approach to\\nthe material assemblages of law with the ‘grand talk’ and conceptual\\nabstractions of law. This article considers the intersection of formal legal\\ndiscourse and the mundanity of bureaucratic practice through an examination\\nof two judicial opinions concerning the legal significance of the\\nBates number, a sequential digit inscribed onto documents produced in\\nUS pretrial discovery. Through this analysis, the article both illustrates the\\nBates stamp’s role in the material constitution of law, and offers a reminder\\nthat the stories law tells about its own materiality can offer insights into,\\nand enact and extend, the sociolegal agency of bureaucratic tools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Legal Anthropology\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Legal Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/JLA.2018.020204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/JLA.2018.020204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

法律物质性的民族志研究和法律的官僚世俗性经常将他们丰富的经验方法与法律的“宏大谈话”和法律的概念抽象并列。本文通过对两种司法意见的考察,探讨了正式法律话语与官僚实践的世俗性之间的交集。这两种司法意见涉及贝茨号的法律意义,贝茨号是美国审前发现过程中产生的文件上的一个顺序数字。通过这一分析,本文既说明了贝茨邮票在法律物质构成中的作用,又提醒人们,法律讲述的关于其自身物质性的故事可以提供对官僚工具的社会法律代理的见解,并制定和扩展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On the Material Semiotics of the Bates Stamp
Ethnographic studies of legal materiality and the bureaucratic mundanities of law often juxtapose their richly empirical approach to the material assemblages of law with the ‘grand talk’ and conceptual abstractions of law. This article considers the intersection of formal legal discourse and the mundanity of bureaucratic practice through an examination of two judicial opinions concerning the legal significance of the Bates number, a sequential digit inscribed onto documents produced in US pretrial discovery. Through this analysis, the article both illustrates the Bates stamp’s role in the material constitution of law, and offers a reminder that the stories law tells about its own materiality can offer insights into, and enact and extend, the sociolegal agency of bureaucratic tools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Concorde's Tyres Reckoning with Law—and with Legal Anthropology Durable Resolutions Indigenous Peoples and Criminal Justice Legal aid amid bureaucracy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1