{"title":"论贝茨邮票的物质符号学","authors":"A. L. Kaljund","doi":"10.3167/JLA.2018.020204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ethnographic studies of legal materiality and the bureaucratic\nmundanities of law often juxtapose their richly empirical approach to\nthe material assemblages of law with the ‘grand talk’ and conceptual\nabstractions of law. This article considers the intersection of formal legal\ndiscourse and the mundanity of bureaucratic practice through an examination\nof two judicial opinions concerning the legal significance of the\nBates number, a sequential digit inscribed onto documents produced in\nUS pretrial discovery. Through this analysis, the article both illustrates the\nBates stamp’s role in the material constitution of law, and offers a reminder\nthat the stories law tells about its own materiality can offer insights into,\nand enact and extend, the sociolegal agency of bureaucratic tools.","PeriodicalId":34676,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Anthropology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Material Semiotics of the Bates Stamp\",\"authors\":\"A. L. Kaljund\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/JLA.2018.020204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ethnographic studies of legal materiality and the bureaucratic\\nmundanities of law often juxtapose their richly empirical approach to\\nthe material assemblages of law with the ‘grand talk’ and conceptual\\nabstractions of law. This article considers the intersection of formal legal\\ndiscourse and the mundanity of bureaucratic practice through an examination\\nof two judicial opinions concerning the legal significance of the\\nBates number, a sequential digit inscribed onto documents produced in\\nUS pretrial discovery. Through this analysis, the article both illustrates the\\nBates stamp’s role in the material constitution of law, and offers a reminder\\nthat the stories law tells about its own materiality can offer insights into,\\nand enact and extend, the sociolegal agency of bureaucratic tools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Legal Anthropology\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Legal Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/JLA.2018.020204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/JLA.2018.020204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ethnographic studies of legal materiality and the bureaucratic
mundanities of law often juxtapose their richly empirical approach to
the material assemblages of law with the ‘grand talk’ and conceptual
abstractions of law. This article considers the intersection of formal legal
discourse and the mundanity of bureaucratic practice through an examination
of two judicial opinions concerning the legal significance of the
Bates number, a sequential digit inscribed onto documents produced in
US pretrial discovery. Through this analysis, the article both illustrates the
Bates stamp’s role in the material constitution of law, and offers a reminder
that the stories law tells about its own materiality can offer insights into,
and enact and extend, the sociolegal agency of bureaucratic tools.