选择性COX‐2抑制剂塞来昔布对胃粘膜安全性的实验研究

Jun Ting Li, Z. Li, X. Zhan, Z. Cui, Shinan Nie
{"title":"选择性COX‐2抑制剂塞来昔布对胃粘膜安全性的实验研究","authors":"Jun Ting Li, Z. Li, X. Zhan, Z. Cui, Shinan Nie","doi":"10.1046/J.1443-9573.2003.T01-1-00115.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE:  To compare the gastric mucosal damage induced by a COX-2 inhibitor, celecoxib, and a conventional NSAID, indomethacin. \n \n \n \nMETHODS:  A rat model of NSAID-induced gastric mucosal damage was prepared for indomethacin and celecoxib separately (n = 8). After gastric damage was induced by 100% ethanol, celecoxib was administered by gastric gavage (n = 8). Gastric mucosal concentrations of 6-keto-PGF1α and TXB2 and the lesion index (LI) were measured. Morphological changes of the gastric mucosa were assessed under light and scanning electron microscopy. \n \n \n \nRESULTS:  Indomethacin caused marked gastric damage (LI: 13.38 ± 2.06) and significant reduction of the concentrations of 6-keto-PGF1α and TXB2 (P < 0.01), Celecoxib did not produce necrotic injuries on healthy gastric mucosa (LI: 0), but the mucosal injuries previously induced by ethanol worsened after its administration (LI: 37.19 ± 3.34 vs 19.90 ± 2.28, P < 0.01). \n \n \n \nCONCLUSIONS:  Inhibition of COX-1 is the major mechanism of NSAIDs in producing gastric mucosal damage. As a selective COX-2 inhibitor, celecoxib does not produce toxic injuries of the healthy gastric mucosa, and is thus safer than conventional NSAID. However, when administered in the presence of an altered gastric mucosa, gastric injuries were worsened.","PeriodicalId":10082,"journal":{"name":"Chinese journal of digestive diseases","volume":"64 1","pages":"53-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental study of the safety of the selective COX‐2 inhibitor, celecoxib, for gastric mucosa\",\"authors\":\"Jun Ting Li, Z. Li, X. Zhan, Z. Cui, Shinan Nie\",\"doi\":\"10.1046/J.1443-9573.2003.T01-1-00115.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE:  To compare the gastric mucosal damage induced by a COX-2 inhibitor, celecoxib, and a conventional NSAID, indomethacin. \\n \\n \\n \\nMETHODS:  A rat model of NSAID-induced gastric mucosal damage was prepared for indomethacin and celecoxib separately (n = 8). After gastric damage was induced by 100% ethanol, celecoxib was administered by gastric gavage (n = 8). Gastric mucosal concentrations of 6-keto-PGF1α and TXB2 and the lesion index (LI) were measured. Morphological changes of the gastric mucosa were assessed under light and scanning electron microscopy. \\n \\n \\n \\nRESULTS:  Indomethacin caused marked gastric damage (LI: 13.38 ± 2.06) and significant reduction of the concentrations of 6-keto-PGF1α and TXB2 (P < 0.01), Celecoxib did not produce necrotic injuries on healthy gastric mucosa (LI: 0), but the mucosal injuries previously induced by ethanol worsened after its administration (LI: 37.19 ± 3.34 vs 19.90 ± 2.28, P < 0.01). \\n \\n \\n \\nCONCLUSIONS:  Inhibition of COX-1 is the major mechanism of NSAIDs in producing gastric mucosal damage. As a selective COX-2 inhibitor, celecoxib does not produce toxic injuries of the healthy gastric mucosa, and is thus safer than conventional NSAID. However, when administered in the presence of an altered gastric mucosa, gastric injuries were worsened.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese journal of digestive diseases\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"53-56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese journal of digestive diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1443-9573.2003.T01-1-00115.X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese journal of digestive diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1443-9573.2003.T01-1-00115.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:比较COX-2抑制剂塞来昔布和传统非甾体抗炎药吲哚美辛对胃粘膜的损伤。方法:分别用吲哚美辛和塞来昔布制备非甾体抗炎药(nsaid)致胃粘膜损伤大鼠模型(n = 8), 100%乙醇诱导胃损伤后,灌胃塞来昔布(n = 8),测定胃黏膜6-酮- pgf1 α、TXB2浓度及损伤指数(LI)。在光镜和扫描电镜下观察胃黏膜的形态学变化。结果:吲哚美辛对胃损伤显著(LI: 13.38±2.06),6-酮- pgf1 α和TXB2浓度显著降低(P < 0.01),塞来昔布对健康胃粘膜无坏死损伤(LI: 0),但给药后乙醇诱导的粘膜损伤加重(LI: 37.19±3.34 vs 19.90±2.28,P < 0.01)。结论:抑制COX-1是非甾体抗炎药引起胃粘膜损伤的主要机制。作为一种选择性COX-2抑制剂,塞来昔布不会对健康胃粘膜产生毒性损伤,因此比传统的非甾体抗炎药更安全。然而,当胃粘膜发生改变时,胃损伤加重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experimental study of the safety of the selective COX‐2 inhibitor, celecoxib, for gastric mucosa
OBJECTIVE:  To compare the gastric mucosal damage induced by a COX-2 inhibitor, celecoxib, and a conventional NSAID, indomethacin. METHODS:  A rat model of NSAID-induced gastric mucosal damage was prepared for indomethacin and celecoxib separately (n = 8). After gastric damage was induced by 100% ethanol, celecoxib was administered by gastric gavage (n = 8). Gastric mucosal concentrations of 6-keto-PGF1α and TXB2 and the lesion index (LI) were measured. Morphological changes of the gastric mucosa were assessed under light and scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS:  Indomethacin caused marked gastric damage (LI: 13.38 ± 2.06) and significant reduction of the concentrations of 6-keto-PGF1α and TXB2 (P < 0.01), Celecoxib did not produce necrotic injuries on healthy gastric mucosa (LI: 0), but the mucosal injuries previously induced by ethanol worsened after its administration (LI: 37.19 ± 3.34 vs 19.90 ± 2.28, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS:  Inhibition of COX-1 is the major mechanism of NSAIDs in producing gastric mucosal damage. As a selective COX-2 inhibitor, celecoxib does not produce toxic injuries of the healthy gastric mucosa, and is thus safer than conventional NSAID. However, when administered in the presence of an altered gastric mucosa, gastric injuries were worsened.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prospective randomized clinical trial of two drug delivery pathway in the treatment of inoperable advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Meta-analysis of inoperable pancreatic cancer: gemcitabine combined with cisplatin versus gemcitabine alone. Prevalence and risk factors of Helicobacter pylori infection in healthy schoolchildren. Association of peptic ulcer with increased expression of Lewis antigens, but not vacuolating cytotoxin activity or babA2 gene status, in Helicobacter pylori strains from China. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound staging of gastric cancer in routine clinical practice in Singapore.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1