自主学习与教师指导:对中高级英语学习者口语水平和口语结构准确性的影响

Q2 Arts and Humanities Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.56040/sdje1922
Masoomeh Estaji, Ladan Jonaidi-Jafari
{"title":"自主学习与教师指导:对中高级英语学习者口语水平和口语结构准确性的影响","authors":"Masoomeh Estaji, Ladan Jonaidi-Jafari","doi":"10.56040/sdje1922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the effects and effectiveness of Self-Directed Learning (SDL) vs. Teacher-Led Instruction (TLI) on EFL learners’ oral proficiency and speaking structural accuracy. To this end, 52 participants were selected and assigned to intermediate and advanced levels. Afterward, both levels were divided into two groups of SDL and TLI randomly. All participants received eight sessions of treatment on their English-speaking by practicing the principles of SDL and TLI. IELTS speaking test was administered before and after treatment. The results revealed that learners of both levels benefited equally from SDL more than TLI. To explore the usefulness of these two approaches, five intermediate and five advanced participants were asked to write narratives. The results revealed that the participants mainly referred to SDL as a factor that could make them independent in detecting their speaking problems. Moreover, teachers in TLI had pivotal roles in guiding and managing the speaking process.","PeriodicalId":38893,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching","volume":"88 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-Directed Learning Versus Teacher-Led Instruction: Their Effects on Oral Proficiency and Speaking Structural Accuracy of Intermediate and Advanced EFL Learners\",\"authors\":\"Masoomeh Estaji, Ladan Jonaidi-Jafari\",\"doi\":\"10.56040/sdje1922\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigated the effects and effectiveness of Self-Directed Learning (SDL) vs. Teacher-Led Instruction (TLI) on EFL learners’ oral proficiency and speaking structural accuracy. To this end, 52 participants were selected and assigned to intermediate and advanced levels. Afterward, both levels were divided into two groups of SDL and TLI randomly. All participants received eight sessions of treatment on their English-speaking by practicing the principles of SDL and TLI. IELTS speaking test was administered before and after treatment. The results revealed that learners of both levels benefited equally from SDL more than TLI. To explore the usefulness of these two approaches, five intermediate and five advanced participants were asked to write narratives. The results revealed that the participants mainly referred to SDL as a factor that could make them independent in detecting their speaking problems. Moreover, teachers in TLI had pivotal roles in guiding and managing the speaking process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56040/sdje1922\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56040/sdje1922","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了自主学习(SDL)与教师主导教学(TLI)对英语学习者口语水平和口语结构准确性的影响和效果。为此,选出了52名参加者,并将其分配到中级和高级水平。随后,将两组患者随机分为SDL和TLI两组。所有的参与者都接受了8个疗程的英语治疗,通过实践SDL和TLI的原则。在治疗前后分别进行雅思口语测试。结果表明,两种水平的学习者从SDL中获得的收益相同。为了探索这两种方法的有用性,五名中级和五名高级参与者被要求写叙述。结果显示,参与者主要将SDL作为一个因素,使他们能够独立地发现自己的语言问题。此外,英语教学中的教师在引导和管理口语过程中起着关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Self-Directed Learning Versus Teacher-Led Instruction: Their Effects on Oral Proficiency and Speaking Structural Accuracy of Intermediate and Advanced EFL Learners
This study investigated the effects and effectiveness of Self-Directed Learning (SDL) vs. Teacher-Led Instruction (TLI) on EFL learners’ oral proficiency and speaking structural accuracy. To this end, 52 participants were selected and assigned to intermediate and advanced levels. Afterward, both levels were divided into two groups of SDL and TLI randomly. All participants received eight sessions of treatment on their English-speaking by practicing the principles of SDL and TLI. IELTS speaking test was administered before and after treatment. The results revealed that learners of both levels benefited equally from SDL more than TLI. To explore the usefulness of these two approaches, five intermediate and five advanced participants were asked to write narratives. The results revealed that the participants mainly referred to SDL as a factor that could make them independent in detecting their speaking problems. Moreover, teachers in TLI had pivotal roles in guiding and managing the speaking process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching
Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: e-FLT is a peer-reviewed academic journal published by the Centre for Language Studies of the National University of Singapore. Its primary objective is to disseminate scholarly information on research and development in the field of Second and Foreign Language Teaching and Learning in Asia and beyond. It publishes articles and book reviews in English as well as in any of the following twelve languages taught at the Centre for Language Studies: Arabic, Chinese, French, German, Hindi, Indonesian, Japanese, Korean, Malay, Tamil, Thai and Vietnamese. It will also welcome any information on upcoming academic conferences, seminars or symposiums as a service to its readers. It is unique in that it is multilingual and practises the policy of accepting and publishing articles in twelve different languages. There will be two issues of e-FLT a year, appearing in the months of June and December. e-FLT is published electronically in the Internet to allow it to reach a wider audience in Asia and the rest of the world, while keeping production costs to a minimum, making it possible to grant free access to the journal. e-FLT focuses primarily on – but is not restricted to – the following areas of inquiry and development in Second and Foreign Language Teaching and Learning: Teaching Methodologies Curriculum Development and Syllabus Design Materials Design Teacher Education and Professional Development Theories of Second Language Acquisition Theories of Second and Foreign Language Teaching Innovations/New Technologies in Language Teaching Linguistics Theories and Language Teaching.
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Awareness-Raising and Explicit Instruction of Compensatory Strategies on Young Leaners' EFL Oral and Written Production The usefulness of TikTok voice-over challenges as ESL speaking activities: A case study on Malaysian undergraduates EFL high school teachers’ beliefs and practices of learner autonomy Investigating the coverage of speech acts in Hong Kong ELT textbooks Contributions of motivational components to L2 achievement through the mediation of learning strategies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1