P. I. Len'kin, A. Smetkin, A. Husseyn, E. Fot, A. I. Len’kin, K. Paromov, A. Ushakov, M. A. Krygina, M. Kirov
{"title":"脉搏共氧仪在心脏手术中的连续血红蛋白监测。","authors":"P. I. Len'kin, A. Smetkin, A. Husseyn, E. Fot, A. I. Len’kin, K. Paromov, A. Ushakov, M. A. Krygina, M. Kirov","doi":"10.18821/0201-7563-2016-61-5-329-334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"THE AIM\nTo assess the accuracy ofcontinuous hemoglobin monitoring using pulse co-oximetry and revealfactors affecting the results of the measurements during early postoperative period in cardiac surgery.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\n27 patients undergoing off-pump CABG and 16patients after elective complex (repair or replacement of two or more valves) or combined (valve and coronary artery) cardiac surgery requiring CPB were enrolled into a prospective observational study. Both groups received continuous hemoglobin monitoring using pulse co-oximetry (SpHb). During early postoperative period SpHb was compared with hemoglobin concentration in the arterial blood (Hbart).\n\n\nRESULTS\nWefoundpositive correlation between SpHb and Hb in both groups (rho =0,29, p < 0,05 u rho=0,34; p<0.005 respectively). The Bland-Altman analysis showed a bias ? limits of agreement (?I.96 SD) between the continuously measured hemoglobin and reference arterial blood hemoglobin concentration of -6,0 ? 41,0 g/l in the off-pump group and 7,7 k 31,0 g/l in the CPB group.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nHemoglobin measurement using pulse co-oximetry does not provide acceptable accuracy during early postoperative period in cardiac surgery. Applicability of this technology is influenced by vascular tone, systemic and regional tissue hypoperfusion.","PeriodicalId":7795,"journal":{"name":"Anesteziologiia i reanimatologiia","volume":"34 1","pages":"329-334"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[CONTINUOUS HEMOGLOBIN MONITORING USING PULSE CO-OXIMETRY IN CARDIAC SURGERY.]\",\"authors\":\"P. I. Len'kin, A. Smetkin, A. Husseyn, E. Fot, A. I. Len’kin, K. Paromov, A. Ushakov, M. A. Krygina, M. Kirov\",\"doi\":\"10.18821/0201-7563-2016-61-5-329-334\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"THE AIM\\nTo assess the accuracy ofcontinuous hemoglobin monitoring using pulse co-oximetry and revealfactors affecting the results of the measurements during early postoperative period in cardiac surgery.\\n\\n\\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\\n27 patients undergoing off-pump CABG and 16patients after elective complex (repair or replacement of two or more valves) or combined (valve and coronary artery) cardiac surgery requiring CPB were enrolled into a prospective observational study. Both groups received continuous hemoglobin monitoring using pulse co-oximetry (SpHb). During early postoperative period SpHb was compared with hemoglobin concentration in the arterial blood (Hbart).\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nWefoundpositive correlation between SpHb and Hb in both groups (rho =0,29, p < 0,05 u rho=0,34; p<0.005 respectively). The Bland-Altman analysis showed a bias ? limits of agreement (?I.96 SD) between the continuously measured hemoglobin and reference arterial blood hemoglobin concentration of -6,0 ? 41,0 g/l in the off-pump group and 7,7 k 31,0 g/l in the CPB group.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nHemoglobin measurement using pulse co-oximetry does not provide acceptable accuracy during early postoperative period in cardiac surgery. Applicability of this technology is influenced by vascular tone, systemic and regional tissue hypoperfusion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesteziologiia i reanimatologiia\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"329-334\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesteziologiia i reanimatologiia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18821/0201-7563-2016-61-5-329-334\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesteziologiia i reanimatologiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18821/0201-7563-2016-61-5-329-334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的评价脉搏共氧仪在心脏手术术后早期连续监测血红蛋白的准确性,揭示影响监测结果的因素。材料与方法27例接受非体外循环CABG的患者和16例接受选择性复杂(修复或更换两个或多个瓣膜)或联合(瓣膜和冠状动脉)心脏手术需要CPB的患者纳入前瞻性观察研究。两组均采用脉搏共氧仪(SpHb)连续监测血红蛋白。术后早期SpHb与动脉血血红蛋白浓度(Hbart)进行比较。结果两组患者SpHb与Hb呈正相关(rho =0,29, p < 0,05; rho=0,34;p < 0.005)。布兰德-奥特曼的分析有偏差吗?协议的限度(I.96)连续测量的血红蛋白与参考动脉血血红蛋白浓度(-6,0 ?停泵组为41,0 g/l, CPB组为7,7 k 31,0 g/l。结论在心脏手术术后早期,用脉搏共氧仪测定血红蛋白的准确性不理想。该技术的适用性受血管张力、全身和局部组织灌注不足的影响。
[CONTINUOUS HEMOGLOBIN MONITORING USING PULSE CO-OXIMETRY IN CARDIAC SURGERY.]
THE AIM
To assess the accuracy ofcontinuous hemoglobin monitoring using pulse co-oximetry and revealfactors affecting the results of the measurements during early postoperative period in cardiac surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
27 patients undergoing off-pump CABG and 16patients after elective complex (repair or replacement of two or more valves) or combined (valve and coronary artery) cardiac surgery requiring CPB were enrolled into a prospective observational study. Both groups received continuous hemoglobin monitoring using pulse co-oximetry (SpHb). During early postoperative period SpHb was compared with hemoglobin concentration in the arterial blood (Hbart).
RESULTS
Wefoundpositive correlation between SpHb and Hb in both groups (rho =0,29, p < 0,05 u rho=0,34; p<0.005 respectively). The Bland-Altman analysis showed a bias ? limits of agreement (?I.96 SD) between the continuously measured hemoglobin and reference arterial blood hemoglobin concentration of -6,0 ? 41,0 g/l in the off-pump group and 7,7 k 31,0 g/l in the CPB group.
CONCLUSIONS
Hemoglobin measurement using pulse co-oximetry does not provide acceptable accuracy during early postoperative period in cardiac surgery. Applicability of this technology is influenced by vascular tone, systemic and regional tissue hypoperfusion.