在 GPU 上使用最小平方移动粒子半隐式方法进行流入和流出数值模拟

IF 2.8 3区 工程技术 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computational Particle Mechanics Pub Date : 2023-09-08 DOI:10.1007/s40571-023-00643-5
Yun Kong, Shuai Zhang, Jifa Zhang, Yao Zheng
{"title":"在 GPU 上使用最小平方移动粒子半隐式方法进行流入和流出数值模拟","authors":"Yun Kong,&nbsp;Shuai Zhang,&nbsp;Jifa Zhang,&nbsp;Yao Zheng","doi":"10.1007/s40571-023-00643-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The implementation of the inlet and outlet boundaries is a key issue in the particle method. The boundary implementation at the inlet applicable to the original MPS method is difficult to be applied to the LSMPS method with higher accuracy. Advanced inlet and outlet boundary implementations are proposed in this study, including inlet boundaries with velocity profile, static pressure, total pressure, and deleted particle detection method for outlet boundary. Three pipe flow cases are used to verify the accuracy of inlet boundaries. For the velocity inlet boundary, the calculation of velocity near the central axis of the pipe has an average error of 0.17%. For the static pressure inlet boundary, the average error of pressure calculation near the central axis is 1.80%. For the total pressure inlet boundary, the numerical final velocity of water in the pipe has a 3.02% error compared with the theoretical result. A reservoir with two inlets and one outlet is used to verify the applicability of the above implementation in a 3D engineering case with five different inlet velocities. The results show that for different velocity inlets, the simulations obtain different filling times, and for velocity and pressure distributions near the outlet in accordance with the theoretical situation. The implementation proposed in this study can be used for practical engineering problems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":524,"journal":{"name":"Computational Particle Mechanics","volume":"11 2","pages":"627 - 641"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inflow and outflow numerical simulation using least-square moving particle semi-implicit method on GPU\",\"authors\":\"Yun Kong,&nbsp;Shuai Zhang,&nbsp;Jifa Zhang,&nbsp;Yao Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40571-023-00643-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The implementation of the inlet and outlet boundaries is a key issue in the particle method. The boundary implementation at the inlet applicable to the original MPS method is difficult to be applied to the LSMPS method with higher accuracy. Advanced inlet and outlet boundary implementations are proposed in this study, including inlet boundaries with velocity profile, static pressure, total pressure, and deleted particle detection method for outlet boundary. Three pipe flow cases are used to verify the accuracy of inlet boundaries. For the velocity inlet boundary, the calculation of velocity near the central axis of the pipe has an average error of 0.17%. For the static pressure inlet boundary, the average error of pressure calculation near the central axis is 1.80%. For the total pressure inlet boundary, the numerical final velocity of water in the pipe has a 3.02% error compared with the theoretical result. A reservoir with two inlets and one outlet is used to verify the applicability of the above implementation in a 3D engineering case with five different inlet velocities. The results show that for different velocity inlets, the simulations obtain different filling times, and for velocity and pressure distributions near the outlet in accordance with the theoretical situation. The implementation proposed in this study can be used for practical engineering problems.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":524,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computational Particle Mechanics\",\"volume\":\"11 2\",\"pages\":\"627 - 641\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computational Particle Mechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40571-023-00643-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Particle Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40571-023-00643-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

入口和出口边界的实现是粒子法的一个关键问题。适用于原始 MPS 方法的入口边界实现很难应用于精度更高的 LSMPS 方法。本研究提出了先进的入口和出口边界实现方法,包括带有速度剖面、静压、总压的入口边界,以及用于出口边界的删除粒子检测方法。我们使用了三个管道流动案例来验证入口边界的准确性。对于速度入口边界,管道中心轴附近的速度计算平均误差为 0.17%。对于静压入口边界,中心轴附近的压力计算平均误差为 1.80%。对于总压入口边界,管道中水的最终流速数值计算结果与理论结果相比误差为 3.02%。使用一个具有两个入口和一个出口的水库,在五种不同入口速度的三维工程案例中验证了上述实现方法的适用性。结果表明,对于不同速度的入口,模拟得到的充注时间不同,出口附近的速度和压力分布也与理论情况一致。本研究提出的实现方法可用于实际工程问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inflow and outflow numerical simulation using least-square moving particle semi-implicit method on GPU

The implementation of the inlet and outlet boundaries is a key issue in the particle method. The boundary implementation at the inlet applicable to the original MPS method is difficult to be applied to the LSMPS method with higher accuracy. Advanced inlet and outlet boundary implementations are proposed in this study, including inlet boundaries with velocity profile, static pressure, total pressure, and deleted particle detection method for outlet boundary. Three pipe flow cases are used to verify the accuracy of inlet boundaries. For the velocity inlet boundary, the calculation of velocity near the central axis of the pipe has an average error of 0.17%. For the static pressure inlet boundary, the average error of pressure calculation near the central axis is 1.80%. For the total pressure inlet boundary, the numerical final velocity of water in the pipe has a 3.02% error compared with the theoretical result. A reservoir with two inlets and one outlet is used to verify the applicability of the above implementation in a 3D engineering case with five different inlet velocities. The results show that for different velocity inlets, the simulations obtain different filling times, and for velocity and pressure distributions near the outlet in accordance with the theoretical situation. The implementation proposed in this study can be used for practical engineering problems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computational Particle Mechanics
Computational Particle Mechanics Mathematics-Computational Mathematics
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: GENERAL OBJECTIVES: Computational Particle Mechanics (CPM) is a quarterly journal with the goal of publishing full-length original articles addressing the modeling and simulation of systems involving particles and particle methods. The goal is to enhance communication among researchers in the applied sciences who use "particles'''' in one form or another in their research. SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES: Particle-based materials and numerical methods have become wide-spread in the natural and applied sciences, engineering, biology. The term "particle methods/mechanics'''' has now come to imply several different things to researchers in the 21st century, including: (a) Particles as a physical unit in granular media, particulate flows, plasmas, swarms, etc., (b) Particles representing material phases in continua at the meso-, micro-and nano-scale and (c) Particles as a discretization unit in continua and discontinua in numerical methods such as Discrete Element Methods (DEM), Particle Finite Element Methods (PFEM), Molecular Dynamics (MD), and Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH), to name a few.
期刊最新文献
Multiscale analysis of elastodynamics of graphene-embedded ceramic composite plates A calibration framework for DEM models based on the stress‒strain curve of uniaxial compressive tests by using the AEO algorithm and several calibration suggestions Four-dimensional lattice spring model for blasting vibration of tunnel surrounding rock Optimization research on the layout of scouring pipes in the slurry shield based on CFD-DEM simulation DEM meso-damage analysis for double-block ballastless track with non-coincident interlayer contact
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1