世界劳工议会:国际劳工组织的第一个百年

N. Countouris, K. Ewing
{"title":"世界劳工议会:国际劳工组织的第一个百年","authors":"N. Countouris, K. Ewing","doi":"10.1080/09615768.2021.1969760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This special issue of the King’s Law Journal includes some of the papers that were first presented at a symposium jointly organised by our respective academic institutions, KCL and UCL, in November 2019, to celebrate the International Labour Organisation’s (ILO) first centenary. The symposium gave its attendees an opportunity to celebrate the contribution of the ILO to social justice and the quest for dignity in the world of work. It also became an opportunity to reflect on the future of the organisation, the challenges it faces, and the role of international labour standards more broadly. Crucially, it identified the principle of Freedom of Association as the axis around which the entire institutional and normative machinery of the ILO revolves. This was a suitable principle from which to analyse the functioning of an organisation that is sometimes referred to as ‘The World Parliament of Labour’, in a way that seeks to highlight both the rule-setting role of the organisation and its very unique democratic and representative credentials. Indeed, if the International Labour Conference (ILC) is often described as ‘the motor’ of the ILO, then Freedom of Association ought to be seen as the fuel and lubricant that make that engine work. Within the ILO, Freedom of Association is both a constitutional","PeriodicalId":88025,"journal":{"name":"King's law journal : KLJ","volume":"22 1","pages":"179 - 182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The World Parliament of Labour: The International Labour Organisation's First Hundred Years\",\"authors\":\"N. Countouris, K. Ewing\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09615768.2021.1969760\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This special issue of the King’s Law Journal includes some of the papers that were first presented at a symposium jointly organised by our respective academic institutions, KCL and UCL, in November 2019, to celebrate the International Labour Organisation’s (ILO) first centenary. The symposium gave its attendees an opportunity to celebrate the contribution of the ILO to social justice and the quest for dignity in the world of work. It also became an opportunity to reflect on the future of the organisation, the challenges it faces, and the role of international labour standards more broadly. Crucially, it identified the principle of Freedom of Association as the axis around which the entire institutional and normative machinery of the ILO revolves. This was a suitable principle from which to analyse the functioning of an organisation that is sometimes referred to as ‘The World Parliament of Labour’, in a way that seeks to highlight both the rule-setting role of the organisation and its very unique democratic and representative credentials. Indeed, if the International Labour Conference (ILC) is often described as ‘the motor’ of the ILO, then Freedom of Association ought to be seen as the fuel and lubricant that make that engine work. Within the ILO, Freedom of Association is both a constitutional\",\"PeriodicalId\":88025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"King's law journal : KLJ\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"179 - 182\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"King's law journal : KLJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2021.1969760\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"King's law journal : KLJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2021.1969760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本期《国王法杂志》特刊收录了2019年11月由我们各自的学术机构——吉隆坡大学学院和伦敦大学学院联合举办的研讨会上首次发表的一些论文,以庆祝国际劳工组织(ILO)成立100周年。专题讨论会使与会者有机会庆祝劳工组织对劳动世界的社会正义和追求尊严所作的贡献。这也成为一个反思该组织未来的机会,它面临的挑战,以及更广泛的国际劳工标准的作用。至关重要的是,它确定结社自由原则是劳工组织整个体制和规范机制围绕这一原则运转的轴心。这是一个合适的原则,用来分析一个有时被称为“世界劳工议会”的组织的运作,以一种旨在突出该组织的规则制定作用及其非常独特的民主和代表性资格的方式。的确,如果国际劳工大会(ILC)经常被描述为国际劳工组织的“发动机”,那么结社自由应该被视为使发动机工作的燃料和润滑剂。在国际劳工组织内部,结社自由既是宪法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The World Parliament of Labour: The International Labour Organisation's First Hundred Years
This special issue of the King’s Law Journal includes some of the papers that were first presented at a symposium jointly organised by our respective academic institutions, KCL and UCL, in November 2019, to celebrate the International Labour Organisation’s (ILO) first centenary. The symposium gave its attendees an opportunity to celebrate the contribution of the ILO to social justice and the quest for dignity in the world of work. It also became an opportunity to reflect on the future of the organisation, the challenges it faces, and the role of international labour standards more broadly. Crucially, it identified the principle of Freedom of Association as the axis around which the entire institutional and normative machinery of the ILO revolves. This was a suitable principle from which to analyse the functioning of an organisation that is sometimes referred to as ‘The World Parliament of Labour’, in a way that seeks to highlight both the rule-setting role of the organisation and its very unique democratic and representative credentials. Indeed, if the International Labour Conference (ILC) is often described as ‘the motor’ of the ILO, then Freedom of Association ought to be seen as the fuel and lubricant that make that engine work. Within the ILO, Freedom of Association is both a constitutional
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unity in diversity? Constitutional identities, deliberative processes and a ‘Border Poll’ in Ireland The Nation vs. the People. The unconstitutionality of secessionist referendums under Belgian constitutional law The impact of federalism on secession referendums: comparing Scotland and Québec Assessing the Legitimacy of Referendums as a Vehicle for Constitutional Amendment: Reform and Abolition of the Legislative Councils in Queensland and New South Wales Referendums and representation in democratic constitution making: Lessons from the failed Chilean constitutional experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1