区域研究:从“全球英语国家”到非洲文学

A. Ede
{"title":"区域研究:从“全球英语国家”到非洲文学","authors":"A. Ede","doi":"10.1080/1369801X.2022.2161058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"African Literature has gone through many phases: from its being denied a literary category to becoming Third World, Commonwealth and Postcolonial Literature respectively and to its latter categorization as a “Global Anglophone Literature” subsumed under an overarching “Area Studies” American academic quota. This essay examines these shifts between categorizations and focalizes the politics, both professional and disciplinary, that undergirds such unstable and sliding nomenclature. It proceeds to tease out, within a postcolonial framework, the Euro-American empire-building imperatives of such naming. While some of these questions are not necessarily completely new, what is unique here is that this reflection concludes by suggesting Afropolitanism as a possible alternative discourse for reading postcolonial African and African diasporic culture.","PeriodicalId":19001,"journal":{"name":"Molecular interventions","volume":"23 1","pages":"657 - 678"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Area Studies: From “Global Anglophone” to Afropolitan Literature\",\"authors\":\"A. Ede\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1369801X.2022.2161058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"African Literature has gone through many phases: from its being denied a literary category to becoming Third World, Commonwealth and Postcolonial Literature respectively and to its latter categorization as a “Global Anglophone Literature” subsumed under an overarching “Area Studies” American academic quota. This essay examines these shifts between categorizations and focalizes the politics, both professional and disciplinary, that undergirds such unstable and sliding nomenclature. It proceeds to tease out, within a postcolonial framework, the Euro-American empire-building imperatives of such naming. While some of these questions are not necessarily completely new, what is unique here is that this reflection concludes by suggesting Afropolitanism as a possible alternative discourse for reading postcolonial African and African diasporic culture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular interventions\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"657 - 678\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2022.2161058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2022.2161058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

非洲文学经历了许多阶段:从被否认为文学类别,到分别成为第三世界文学、英联邦文学和后殖民文学,再到后来被归类为“全球英语文学”,归入美国“区域研究”的学术配额之下。本文考察了这些分类之间的转变,并集中了专业和学科的政治,这是这种不稳定和滑动的命名法的基础。在一个后殖民的框架内,它继续梳理出这种命名的欧美帝国建设的必要性。虽然其中一些问题并不一定是全新的,但这里的独特之处在于,这一反思的结论是,非洲政治主义可以作为阅读后殖民时期非洲和非洲流散文化的一种可能的替代话语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Area Studies: From “Global Anglophone” to Afropolitan Literature
African Literature has gone through many phases: from its being denied a literary category to becoming Third World, Commonwealth and Postcolonial Literature respectively and to its latter categorization as a “Global Anglophone Literature” subsumed under an overarching “Area Studies” American academic quota. This essay examines these shifts between categorizations and focalizes the politics, both professional and disciplinary, that undergirds such unstable and sliding nomenclature. It proceeds to tease out, within a postcolonial framework, the Euro-American empire-building imperatives of such naming. While some of these questions are not necessarily completely new, what is unique here is that this reflection concludes by suggesting Afropolitanism as a possible alternative discourse for reading postcolonial African and African diasporic culture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular interventions
Molecular interventions 生物-生化与分子生物学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Postcolonial Italy, A Public History Project Mapping Colonial Heritage Commemorating the Fascist Empire: The Public Memory of Rodolfo Graziani in Modern Italy Colonial Amnesia and the Material Remains of Italian Colonialism in Mogadishu Dealing with the Material Legacies of Italian Fascist Colonialism in Post-Communist Tirana Constructing and Consuming the Periphery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1