精神分裂症共情分类的元分析

Sumayyah Varachhia
{"title":"精神分裂症共情分类的元分析","authors":"Sumayyah Varachhia","doi":"10.24966/pda-0150/100016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A Meta-Analysis Tax- onomizing Empathy in Schizophrenia. J mental health the general on measures purported assess Commonly, studies have used the Interpersonal a self-report questionnaire using four sub-scales: Fantasy, perspective-taking, personal Abstract Background Trait empathy is integral to relationship development and main- tenance. Therefore, impairment in this ability can have an adverse effect on many domains of life including social, sexual, and marital. Previous reviews show in schizophrenia, this ability to be impaired but with a high amount of heterogeneity that is yet to be explored more thoroughly. Considering this, we aim to synthesise the extent literature using a meta-analytic approach and examine the source of the heterogeneity observed in previous reviews and develop taxonomy of empa- thy deficits in schizophrenia. Hedges’ g was calculated for cognitive and affective empathy using random effects models. Meta-regres- sion models of key cognitive, clinical and demographic risk and protective factors were run. These included: Impact year of publication, age, gender, ethnicity, education, general IQ, verbal/pre-morbid IQ, global neuro-cognition, positive, negative and general symptoms of schizophrenia, age at schizophrenia diagnosis, duration of illness and medication has on cognitive and affective empathy. A literature search revealed 39 independent studies examining em- pathy in schizophrenia. Healthy controls scored higher than people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, with a small effect size for affective empathy (Hedges’ g = 0.29) and a medium effect size for cognitive empathy (Hedges’ g = 0.53). Both components were heterogeneous. Analyses using meta-regression models found age at diagnosis and the duration of illness moderated the difference in effect size for cog- nitive empathy, such that those with an earlier diagnosis or a more chronic course exhibit greater difficulty in cognitive empathy com - pared to healthy controls. We find a longer duration of illness and younger age at clinical diagnosis enhances impairments in cognitive empathy in severe and enduring schizophrenia. For affective empathy, we conclude, com- pared to healthy controls, some patients report having a deficit [i.e. experience lower affective empathy], others report comparable lev- els, and the remaining report to be experiencing higher emotional arousal. As an earlier diagnosis, prolonged illness course and dys- functional emotional reactions are significant risk factors of poorer empathic interactions, it will be important to address the underlying mechanisms of this deficit in future work.","PeriodicalId":91269,"journal":{"name":"HSOA journal of psychiatry, depression & anxiety","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Meta-Analysis Taxonomizing Empathy in Schizophrenia\",\"authors\":\"Sumayyah Varachhia\",\"doi\":\"10.24966/pda-0150/100016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A Meta-Analysis Tax- onomizing Empathy in Schizophrenia. J mental health the general on measures purported assess Commonly, studies have used the Interpersonal a self-report questionnaire using four sub-scales: Fantasy, perspective-taking, personal Abstract Background Trait empathy is integral to relationship development and main- tenance. Therefore, impairment in this ability can have an adverse effect on many domains of life including social, sexual, and marital. Previous reviews show in schizophrenia, this ability to be impaired but with a high amount of heterogeneity that is yet to be explored more thoroughly. Considering this, we aim to synthesise the extent literature using a meta-analytic approach and examine the source of the heterogeneity observed in previous reviews and develop taxonomy of empa- thy deficits in schizophrenia. Hedges’ g was calculated for cognitive and affective empathy using random effects models. Meta-regres- sion models of key cognitive, clinical and demographic risk and protective factors were run. These included: Impact year of publication, age, gender, ethnicity, education, general IQ, verbal/pre-morbid IQ, global neuro-cognition, positive, negative and general symptoms of schizophrenia, age at schizophrenia diagnosis, duration of illness and medication has on cognitive and affective empathy. A literature search revealed 39 independent studies examining em- pathy in schizophrenia. Healthy controls scored higher than people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, with a small effect size for affective empathy (Hedges’ g = 0.29) and a medium effect size for cognitive empathy (Hedges’ g = 0.53). Both components were heterogeneous. Analyses using meta-regression models found age at diagnosis and the duration of illness moderated the difference in effect size for cog- nitive empathy, such that those with an earlier diagnosis or a more chronic course exhibit greater difficulty in cognitive empathy com - pared to healthy controls. We find a longer duration of illness and younger age at clinical diagnosis enhances impairments in cognitive empathy in severe and enduring schizophrenia. For affective empathy, we conclude, com- pared to healthy controls, some patients report having a deficit [i.e. experience lower affective empathy], others report comparable lev- els, and the remaining report to be experiencing higher emotional arousal. As an earlier diagnosis, prolonged illness course and dys- functional emotional reactions are significant risk factors of poorer empathic interactions, it will be important to address the underlying mechanisms of this deficit in future work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HSOA journal of psychiatry, depression & anxiety\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HSOA journal of psychiatry, depression & anxiety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24966/pda-0150/100016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HSOA journal of psychiatry, depression & anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24966/pda-0150/100016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

精神分裂症患者共情的元分析。通常,研究采用人际关系自我报告问卷,共情特质是关系发展和维持不可或缺的组成部分,共情量表包括幻想、换位思考和个人。因此,这种能力的损害会对生活的许多领域产生不利影响,包括社会、性和婚姻。先前的综述表明,在精神分裂症中,这种能力受到损害,但存在大量异质性,有待更彻底地探索。考虑到这一点,我们的目标是使用荟萃分析方法综合大量文献,检查先前综述中观察到的异质性的来源,并发展精神分裂症移情缺陷的分类。使用随机效应模型计算认知共情和情感共情的对冲系数g。对关键的认知、临床和人口风险及保护因素进行meta回归模型分析。这些因素包括:出版年份、年龄、性别、种族、教育程度、一般智商、言语/发病前智商、整体神经认知、精神分裂症的阳性、阴性和一般症状、精神分裂症诊断时的年龄、疾病持续时间和药物对认知和情感共情的影响。文献检索显示有39项独立研究在精神分裂症中检查了em- pathy。健康对照组的得分高于精神分裂症患者,情感共情的效应值较小(赫奇斯的g = 0.29),认知共情的效应值中等(赫奇斯的g = 0.53)。两种成分都是异质的。使用元回归模型的分析发现,诊断时的年龄和疾病持续时间调节了认知共情效应大小的差异,因此,与健康对照组相比,诊断较早或病程较慢的患者在认知共情方面表现出更大的困难。我们发现较长的病程和较年轻的临床诊断年龄增强了严重和持久精神分裂症患者的认知共情障碍。对于情感共情,我们得出结论,与健康对照相比,一些患者报告有缺陷[即情感共情较低],其他人报告相当水平,其余报告经历更高的情绪唤醒。由于早期诊断,病程延长和日功能情绪反应是共情互动不良的重要危险因素,因此在未来的工作中,解决这一缺陷的潜在机制将是重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Meta-Analysis Taxonomizing Empathy in Schizophrenia
A Meta-Analysis Tax- onomizing Empathy in Schizophrenia. J mental health the general on measures purported assess Commonly, studies have used the Interpersonal a self-report questionnaire using four sub-scales: Fantasy, perspective-taking, personal Abstract Background Trait empathy is integral to relationship development and main- tenance. Therefore, impairment in this ability can have an adverse effect on many domains of life including social, sexual, and marital. Previous reviews show in schizophrenia, this ability to be impaired but with a high amount of heterogeneity that is yet to be explored more thoroughly. Considering this, we aim to synthesise the extent literature using a meta-analytic approach and examine the source of the heterogeneity observed in previous reviews and develop taxonomy of empa- thy deficits in schizophrenia. Hedges’ g was calculated for cognitive and affective empathy using random effects models. Meta-regres- sion models of key cognitive, clinical and demographic risk and protective factors were run. These included: Impact year of publication, age, gender, ethnicity, education, general IQ, verbal/pre-morbid IQ, global neuro-cognition, positive, negative and general symptoms of schizophrenia, age at schizophrenia diagnosis, duration of illness and medication has on cognitive and affective empathy. A literature search revealed 39 independent studies examining em- pathy in schizophrenia. Healthy controls scored higher than people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, with a small effect size for affective empathy (Hedges’ g = 0.29) and a medium effect size for cognitive empathy (Hedges’ g = 0.53). Both components were heterogeneous. Analyses using meta-regression models found age at diagnosis and the duration of illness moderated the difference in effect size for cog- nitive empathy, such that those with an earlier diagnosis or a more chronic course exhibit greater difficulty in cognitive empathy com - pared to healthy controls. We find a longer duration of illness and younger age at clinical diagnosis enhances impairments in cognitive empathy in severe and enduring schizophrenia. For affective empathy, we conclude, com- pared to healthy controls, some patients report having a deficit [i.e. experience lower affective empathy], others report comparable lev- els, and the remaining report to be experiencing higher emotional arousal. As an earlier diagnosis, prolonged illness course and dys- functional emotional reactions are significant risk factors of poorer empathic interactions, it will be important to address the underlying mechanisms of this deficit in future work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Depression Prevalence in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Stress, Positive Psychological Resources, and Executive Functioning The Interoceptive Antireward Pathwayand Gut Dysbiosis in Addiction Robotic Assistive Technology Augmenting Dementia Care: Technology Design and Preliminary Acceptability Burnout of Frontline Health Care Workers Working during Sporadic and Cluster Periods of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1