{"title":"暴食症的治疗结果","authors":"G.Terence Wilson","doi":"10.1016/0146-6402(89)90020-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper selectively addresses methodological issues in treatment outcome studies of bulimia. Among the issues examined are the following: methodological strengths; problems, such as the comparability of treatments and lack of long-term follow-ups; dependent measures and their interrelationships; how to gauge treatment success and attrition rates. The quality of studies reflects lessons learned in research with other disorders. Increasingly, studies are showing greater methodological rigor.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100041,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"11 3","pages":"Pages 161-174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0146-6402(89)90020-9","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment outcome in Bulimia\",\"authors\":\"G.Terence Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0146-6402(89)90020-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper selectively addresses methodological issues in treatment outcome studies of bulimia. Among the issues examined are the following: methodological strengths; problems, such as the comparability of treatments and lack of long-term follow-ups; dependent measures and their interrelationships; how to gauge treatment success and attrition rates. The quality of studies reflects lessons learned in research with other disorders. Increasingly, studies are showing greater methodological rigor.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 161-174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0146-6402(89)90020-9\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0146640289900209\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0146640289900209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper selectively addresses methodological issues in treatment outcome studies of bulimia. Among the issues examined are the following: methodological strengths; problems, such as the comparability of treatments and lack of long-term follow-ups; dependent measures and their interrelationships; how to gauge treatment success and attrition rates. The quality of studies reflects lessons learned in research with other disorders. Increasingly, studies are showing greater methodological rigor.