¿PSICOTERAPIAS有害吗?让我们从不良实践开始

IF 1.1 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Papeles del Psicologo Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.23923/pap.psicol2020.2947
G. Mattioli, D. Catalunya
{"title":"¿PSICOTERAPIAS有害吗?让我们从不良实践开始","authors":"G. Mattioli, D. Catalunya","doi":"10.23923/pap.psicol2020.2947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the Eysenck debate on the usefulness of psychotherapy was resolved, professional psychotherapists witnessed seething controversy over the relative efficacy of each method. Having mostly overcome this argument and moved on from the research on efficacy to that on the quality of the therapeutic alliance, once again clinicians in Spain are observing the issue about the potential harmfulness of some therapeutic treatments. In this text, considerations will be developed both at the scientific and the deontological level, from the point of view of the professional practice of psychotherapy.","PeriodicalId":46075,"journal":{"name":"Papeles del Psicologo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"¿PSICOTERAPIAS PERJUDICIALES? COMENCEMOS POR LAS MALAS PRÁCTICAS\",\"authors\":\"G. Mattioli, D. Catalunya\",\"doi\":\"10.23923/pap.psicol2020.2947\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"After the Eysenck debate on the usefulness of psychotherapy was resolved, professional psychotherapists witnessed seething controversy over the relative efficacy of each method. Having mostly overcome this argument and moved on from the research on efficacy to that on the quality of the therapeutic alliance, once again clinicians in Spain are observing the issue about the potential harmfulness of some therapeutic treatments. In this text, considerations will be developed both at the scientific and the deontological level, from the point of view of the professional practice of psychotherapy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Papeles del Psicologo\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Papeles del Psicologo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23923/pap.psicol2020.2947\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Papeles del Psicologo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23923/pap.psicol2020.2947","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在艾森克关于心理治疗有用性的争论得到解决后,专业心理治疗师目睹了对每种方法相对功效的激烈争论。在克服了这些争论之后从疗效研究转移到治疗联盟的质量研究,西班牙的临床医生再一次观察到一些治疗的潜在危害问题。在本文中,从心理治疗专业实践的角度出发,将在科学和道义层面上进行考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
¿PSICOTERAPIAS PERJUDICIALES? COMENCEMOS POR LAS MALAS PRÁCTICAS
After the Eysenck debate on the usefulness of psychotherapy was resolved, professional psychotherapists witnessed seething controversy over the relative efficacy of each method. Having mostly overcome this argument and moved on from the research on efficacy to that on the quality of the therapeutic alliance, once again clinicians in Spain are observing the issue about the potential harmfulness of some therapeutic treatments. In this text, considerations will be developed both at the scientific and the deontological level, from the point of view of the professional practice of psychotherapy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Papeles del Psicologo
Papeles del Psicologo PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
18.20%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: 1. La revista Papeles del Psicólogo publica trabajos referidos al campo profesional de la psicología, principalmente en su vertiente aplicada y profesional. 2. Los trabajos habrán de ser inéditos y los derechos de reproducción por cualquier forma y medio son de la Revista.
期刊最新文献
Epistemology, history and foundations of brief strategic therapy. Giorgio Nardone’s Model The brain in diapers. Can a brain be in the wrong body? Dear trainees, take care of yourselves: A guide to surviving Clinical Psychology Episodic future thinking for the prevention and treatment of health risk behaviors Conflictive divorce and forensic therapy: An intervention framed in the paradigm of therapeutic justice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1