两个最高惩罚:一种求运输问题初始基本可行解的改进Vogels逼近法

B. Amaliah, C. Fatichah, E. Suryani
{"title":"两个最高惩罚:一种求运输问题初始基本可行解的改进Vogels逼近法","authors":"B. Amaliah, C. Fatichah, E. Suryani","doi":"10.1109/ICTS52701.2021.9608005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vogel's Approximation Method (VAM) is one of the methods to find Initial Basic Feasible Solution (IBFS) of Transportation Problem (TP), which is mostly used to find the solution with minimum cost. Unfortunately, VAM has a limitation, i.e., if there are more than one highest penalty, VAM allows to select one arbitrarily. It causes ambiguity on penalty selection, which leads to the production of several alternative final solutions. In order to answer the challenge, Logical Development Of Vogel's Approximation Method (LD-VAM) turned up by selecting penalty in conflict using cell with lowest cost value. This technique triggered another ambiguity when there are several cells with the same minimum cost value. To avoid the ambiguity, Two Highest Penalties Method (THP) is proposed. The proposed method can reduce the cost of transportation problem as it uses Max-Min penalty, select two highest penalties, and use minimum (cost x allocation) to allocate values to the cell. THP still inherits some of VAM and LD-VAM concepts and computation procedures, yet it also introduces a new algorithm to select the suitable cell when ambiguity arises. Numerical examples have been used at this research to prove that THP can solve ambiguity, providing only one final solution and showing better final solution compared to those of VAM and LD-VAM. The result of THP is 98% accurate with optimal solution from TORA Program, which is used as reference.","PeriodicalId":6738,"journal":{"name":"2021 13th International Conference on Information & Communication Technology and System (ICTS)","volume":"45 1","pages":"318-323"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two Highest Penalties: A Modified Vogels Approximation Method to Find Initial Basic Feasible Solution of Transportation Problem\",\"authors\":\"B. Amaliah, C. Fatichah, E. Suryani\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICTS52701.2021.9608005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Vogel's Approximation Method (VAM) is one of the methods to find Initial Basic Feasible Solution (IBFS) of Transportation Problem (TP), which is mostly used to find the solution with minimum cost. Unfortunately, VAM has a limitation, i.e., if there are more than one highest penalty, VAM allows to select one arbitrarily. It causes ambiguity on penalty selection, which leads to the production of several alternative final solutions. In order to answer the challenge, Logical Development Of Vogel's Approximation Method (LD-VAM) turned up by selecting penalty in conflict using cell with lowest cost value. This technique triggered another ambiguity when there are several cells with the same minimum cost value. To avoid the ambiguity, Two Highest Penalties Method (THP) is proposed. The proposed method can reduce the cost of transportation problem as it uses Max-Min penalty, select two highest penalties, and use minimum (cost x allocation) to allocate values to the cell. THP still inherits some of VAM and LD-VAM concepts and computation procedures, yet it also introduces a new algorithm to select the suitable cell when ambiguity arises. Numerical examples have been used at this research to prove that THP can solve ambiguity, providing only one final solution and showing better final solution compared to those of VAM and LD-VAM. The result of THP is 98% accurate with optimal solution from TORA Program, which is used as reference.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6738,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 13th International Conference on Information & Communication Technology and System (ICTS)\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"318-323\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 13th International Conference on Information & Communication Technology and System (ICTS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTS52701.2021.9608005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 13th International Conference on Information & Communication Technology and System (ICTS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTS52701.2021.9608005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Vogel近似法(VAM)是求解运输问题初始基本可行解(IBFS)的方法之一,主要用于求解成本最小的解。不幸的是,VAM有一个限制,即,如果有一个以上的最高惩罚,VAM允许任意选择一个。它导致了惩罚选择的模糊性,从而导致了几种备选的最终解决方案的产生。为了应对这一挑战,沃格尔近似法的逻辑发展(LD-VAM)提出了使用成本值最低的单元选择冲突惩罚的方法。当有几个单元具有相同的最小成本值时,这种技术引发了另一个模糊性。为了避免歧义,提出了两次最高处罚法(THP)。该方法使用Max-Min惩罚,选择两个最高惩罚,并使用最小值(成本x分配)分配值给单元,可以减少运输成本问题。THP仍然继承了VAM和LD-VAM的一些概念和计算过程,但也引入了一种新的算法,在出现歧义时选择合适的单元。本研究用数值算例证明了THP可以解决歧义问题,并且只提供一个最终解,并且与VAM和LD-VAM相比,THP具有更好的最终解。利用TORA程序的最优解,THP的准确度为98%,可作为参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Two Highest Penalties: A Modified Vogels Approximation Method to Find Initial Basic Feasible Solution of Transportation Problem
Vogel's Approximation Method (VAM) is one of the methods to find Initial Basic Feasible Solution (IBFS) of Transportation Problem (TP), which is mostly used to find the solution with minimum cost. Unfortunately, VAM has a limitation, i.e., if there are more than one highest penalty, VAM allows to select one arbitrarily. It causes ambiguity on penalty selection, which leads to the production of several alternative final solutions. In order to answer the challenge, Logical Development Of Vogel's Approximation Method (LD-VAM) turned up by selecting penalty in conflict using cell with lowest cost value. This technique triggered another ambiguity when there are several cells with the same minimum cost value. To avoid the ambiguity, Two Highest Penalties Method (THP) is proposed. The proposed method can reduce the cost of transportation problem as it uses Max-Min penalty, select two highest penalties, and use minimum (cost x allocation) to allocate values to the cell. THP still inherits some of VAM and LD-VAM concepts and computation procedures, yet it also introduces a new algorithm to select the suitable cell when ambiguity arises. Numerical examples have been used at this research to prove that THP can solve ambiguity, providing only one final solution and showing better final solution compared to those of VAM and LD-VAM. The result of THP is 98% accurate with optimal solution from TORA Program, which is used as reference.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Copyright notice] Outlier Detection and Decision Tree for Wireless Sensor Network Fault Diagnosis Graph Algorithm for Anomaly Prediction in East Java Student Admission System FarmEasy: An Intelligent Platform to Empower Crops Prediction and Crops Marketing Hiding Messages in Audio using Modulus Operation and Simple Partition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1