精神分裂症患者阴性症状自我评价(SNS)的欧洲西班牙文版验证

Leticia García-Álvarez , Clara Martínez-Cao , Teresa Bobes-Bascarán , Almudena Portilla , Philippe Courtet , Lorena de la Fuente-Tomás , Ángela Velasco , Leticia González-Blanco , Paula Zurrón-Madera , Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero , Pilar A. Sáiz , María Paz García-Portilla , Julio Bobes
{"title":"精神分裂症患者阴性症状自我评价(SNS)的欧洲西班牙文版验证","authors":"Leticia García-Álvarez ,&nbsp;Clara Martínez-Cao ,&nbsp;Teresa Bobes-Bascarán ,&nbsp;Almudena Portilla ,&nbsp;Philippe Courtet ,&nbsp;Lorena de la Fuente-Tomás ,&nbsp;Ángela Velasco ,&nbsp;Leticia González-Blanco ,&nbsp;Paula Zurrón-Madera ,&nbsp;Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero ,&nbsp;Pilar A. Sáiz ,&nbsp;María Paz García-Portilla ,&nbsp;Julio Bobes","doi":"10.1016/j.rpsmen.2022.01.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Negative symptoms can be grouped into five domains: apathy/avolition, anhedonia, asociality, alogia, and affective flattening. There are few validate self-rated measures that assess these five dimensions. Therefore, this study aimed to validate the Self-Evaluation of Negative Symptoms (SNS) in Spanish patients with schizophrenia.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Cross-sectional, validation study in 104 outpatients with schizophrenia evaluated using the Spanish version of the following scales: Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impression Scale for Schizophrenia (CGI-SCH), Personal and Social Performance (PSP), Motivation and Pleasure Scale – Self-Report (MAP-SR), 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the Self-Evaluation of Negative Symptoms (SNS).</p></div><div><h3>Results Reliability</h3><p>Internal consistency (Cronbach's <em>alpha</em>) was 0.915. Convergent validity: The Pearson correlation coefficient between MAP-SR and SNS Total scores was 0.660 (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). For PANSS-N, the correlation was 0.437 (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.005) and with the CAINS-Total was 0.478 (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.005). Divergent validity: The Pearson correlation coefficient between SNS and PSP was <em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->−0.372 (<em>p</em> <!-->≤<!--> <!-->0.001), and with SF-36 Physical and Mental Summary Component scores were <em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->−0.213 (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.066) and <em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->−0.144 (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.219), respectively. Discriminant validity: SNS Total scores were significantly statistically different according to the severity of the negative symptomatology rated by the CGI-SCH negative scale (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The SNS is a reliable and valid instrument to self-rate the five domains of negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia and seems to be appropriate for use in everyday clinical practice as a complementary measure to the evaluation performed by the clinician.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101104,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental (English Edition)","volume":"15 1","pages":"Pages 14-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173505022000061/pdfft?md5=0855409eac6b3dbcf48746f25531240e&pid=1-s2.0-S2173505022000061-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a European Spanish-version of the Self-Evaluation of Negative Symptoms (SNS) in patients with schizophrenia\",\"authors\":\"Leticia García-Álvarez ,&nbsp;Clara Martínez-Cao ,&nbsp;Teresa Bobes-Bascarán ,&nbsp;Almudena Portilla ,&nbsp;Philippe Courtet ,&nbsp;Lorena de la Fuente-Tomás ,&nbsp;Ángela Velasco ,&nbsp;Leticia González-Blanco ,&nbsp;Paula Zurrón-Madera ,&nbsp;Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero ,&nbsp;Pilar A. Sáiz ,&nbsp;María Paz García-Portilla ,&nbsp;Julio Bobes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rpsmen.2022.01.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Negative symptoms can be grouped into five domains: apathy/avolition, anhedonia, asociality, alogia, and affective flattening. There are few validate self-rated measures that assess these five dimensions. Therefore, this study aimed to validate the Self-Evaluation of Negative Symptoms (SNS) in Spanish patients with schizophrenia.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Cross-sectional, validation study in 104 outpatients with schizophrenia evaluated using the Spanish version of the following scales: Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impression Scale for Schizophrenia (CGI-SCH), Personal and Social Performance (PSP), Motivation and Pleasure Scale – Self-Report (MAP-SR), 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the Self-Evaluation of Negative Symptoms (SNS).</p></div><div><h3>Results Reliability</h3><p>Internal consistency (Cronbach's <em>alpha</em>) was 0.915. Convergent validity: The Pearson correlation coefficient between MAP-SR and SNS Total scores was 0.660 (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). For PANSS-N, the correlation was 0.437 (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.005) and with the CAINS-Total was 0.478 (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.005). Divergent validity: The Pearson correlation coefficient between SNS and PSP was <em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->−0.372 (<em>p</em> <!-->≤<!--> <!-->0.001), and with SF-36 Physical and Mental Summary Component scores were <em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->−0.213 (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.066) and <em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->−0.144 (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.219), respectively. Discriminant validity: SNS Total scores were significantly statistically different according to the severity of the negative symptomatology rated by the CGI-SCH negative scale (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The SNS is a reliable and valid instrument to self-rate the five domains of negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia and seems to be appropriate for use in everyday clinical practice as a complementary measure to the evaluation performed by the clinician.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental (English Edition)\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 14-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173505022000061/pdfft?md5=0855409eac6b3dbcf48746f25531240e&pid=1-s2.0-S2173505022000061-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173505022000061\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173505022000061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

阴性症状可分为五个领域:冷漠/逃避、快感缺乏、社会性、痛症和情感扁平化。很少有有效的评估这五个维度的自评措施。因此,本研究旨在验证西班牙精神分裂症患者的阴性症状自我评价(SNS)。材料与方法对104例精神分裂症门诊患者进行横断面验证研究,采用西班牙语版以下量表进行评估:阴性症状临床评估面谈(CAINS)、阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)、精神分裂症临床总体印象量表(ci - sch)、个人与社会表现量表(PSP)、动机与愉悦量表-自我报告(MAP-SR)、36项简短健康调查(SF-36)和阴性症状自我评价(SNS)。结果信度内部一致性(Cronbach’s alpha)为0.915。收敛效度:MAP-SR与SNS总分的Pearson相关系数为0.660 (p <0.001)。PANSS-N的相关系数为0.437 (p <0.005), CAINS-Total为0.478 (p <0.005)。发散效度:SNS与PSP的Pearson相关系数为r = - 0.372 (p≤0.001),与SF-36的身心总结成分得分分别为r = - 0.213 (p = 0.066)和r = - 0.144 (p = 0.219)。判别效度:SNS总分根据CGI-SCH负性量表评定的负性症状严重程度差异有统计学意义(p <0.001)。结论社交网络是一种可靠、有效的精神分裂症患者阴性症状五域自评工具,适合在日常临床实践中作为临床医生评估的补充措施使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of a European Spanish-version of the Self-Evaluation of Negative Symptoms (SNS) in patients with schizophrenia

Introduction

Negative symptoms can be grouped into five domains: apathy/avolition, anhedonia, asociality, alogia, and affective flattening. There are few validate self-rated measures that assess these five dimensions. Therefore, this study aimed to validate the Self-Evaluation of Negative Symptoms (SNS) in Spanish patients with schizophrenia.

Material and methods

Cross-sectional, validation study in 104 outpatients with schizophrenia evaluated using the Spanish version of the following scales: Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impression Scale for Schizophrenia (CGI-SCH), Personal and Social Performance (PSP), Motivation and Pleasure Scale – Self-Report (MAP-SR), 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the Self-Evaluation of Negative Symptoms (SNS).

Results Reliability

Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.915. Convergent validity: The Pearson correlation coefficient between MAP-SR and SNS Total scores was 0.660 (p < 0.001). For PANSS-N, the correlation was 0.437 (p < 0.005) and with the CAINS-Total was 0.478 (p < 0.005). Divergent validity: The Pearson correlation coefficient between SNS and PSP was r = −0.372 (p  0.001), and with SF-36 Physical and Mental Summary Component scores were r = −0.213 (p = 0.066) and r = −0.144 (p = 0.219), respectively. Discriminant validity: SNS Total scores were significantly statistically different according to the severity of the negative symptomatology rated by the CGI-SCH negative scale (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The SNS is a reliable and valid instrument to self-rate the five domains of negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia and seems to be appropriate for use in everyday clinical practice as a complementary measure to the evaluation performed by the clinician.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Covid-19 outbreak in a Spanish long-term psychiatric hospital led to infections in 6 clozapine patients: elevations in their plasma clozapine levels Diagnostic stability in substance-induced psychosis Clozapine-associated myocarditis in the World Health Organization's pharmacovigilance database: Focus on reports from various countries Dried Blood Spot (DBS) as a useful tool to improve clozapine, aripiprazole and paliperidone treatment: From adherence to efficiency Risk factors of deficit and non-deficit schizophrenia: Results from a cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1