在COVID-19大流行之前和期间镰状细胞病患者静脉血栓栓塞预防措施

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis Pub Date : 2023-09-21 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.4208107
Jennifer Davila, W. Mitchell, K. Morrone, E. Silver, C. Minniti, H. Billett, P. Desai, S. O’Brien, D. Manwani
{"title":"在COVID-19大流行之前和期间镰状细胞病患者静脉血栓栓塞预防措施","authors":"Jennifer Davila, W. Mitchell, K. Morrone, E. Silver, C. Minniti, H. Billett, P. Desai, S. O’Brien, D. Manwani","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4208107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) are predisposed to a hypercoagulable state due to alterations in the coagulation system. Despite concern for the development of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in this population, there are no standardized guidelines for routine thromboprophylaxis. The objective of this study was to assess thromboprophylaxis practices of adult and pediatric treaters of SCD before and during the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. A cross-sectional electronic survey was distributed to pediatric and adult hematology oncology practitioners through seven SCD-specific interest groups between May 29, 2020, and July 13, 2020. Of 93 total responses, 14% (N = 13) reported they only treat patients more than 21 years old; 38.7% (N = 36) only treat patients 0-21 years old and 47.3% (N = 44) reported they treat both. Our study showed that before the COVID-19 pandemic, 96% of adult practitioners would recommend pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis, mechanical thromboprophylaxis or both for hospitalized adults with thromboprophylaxis, but only 76% of pediatric treaters would recommend any thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized children (P < 0.0001), with 24% of pediatric treaters choosing no thromboprophylaxis at all. During the COVID-19 pandemic, pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis specifically was recommended for adults by 94% of treaters and for pediatric patients by 76% of treaters. These findings suggest that despite the lack of evidence-based thromboprophylaxis guidelines in adults and children with thromboprophylaxis, subspecialty treaters routinely provide pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in their adult patients and will modify their practice in pediatric patients who are considered at a high risk for VTE.","PeriodicalId":8992,"journal":{"name":"Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis practices for patients with sickle cell disease prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Davila, W. Mitchell, K. Morrone, E. Silver, C. Minniti, H. Billett, P. Desai, S. O’Brien, D. Manwani\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.4208107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) are predisposed to a hypercoagulable state due to alterations in the coagulation system. Despite concern for the development of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in this population, there are no standardized guidelines for routine thromboprophylaxis. The objective of this study was to assess thromboprophylaxis practices of adult and pediatric treaters of SCD before and during the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. A cross-sectional electronic survey was distributed to pediatric and adult hematology oncology practitioners through seven SCD-specific interest groups between May 29, 2020, and July 13, 2020. Of 93 total responses, 14% (N = 13) reported they only treat patients more than 21 years old; 38.7% (N = 36) only treat patients 0-21 years old and 47.3% (N = 44) reported they treat both. Our study showed that before the COVID-19 pandemic, 96% of adult practitioners would recommend pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis, mechanical thromboprophylaxis or both for hospitalized adults with thromboprophylaxis, but only 76% of pediatric treaters would recommend any thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized children (P < 0.0001), with 24% of pediatric treaters choosing no thromboprophylaxis at all. During the COVID-19 pandemic, pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis specifically was recommended for adults by 94% of treaters and for pediatric patients by 76% of treaters. These findings suggest that despite the lack of evidence-based thromboprophylaxis guidelines in adults and children with thromboprophylaxis, subspecialty treaters routinely provide pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in their adult patients and will modify their practice in pediatric patients who are considered at a high risk for VTE.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4208107\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4208107","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于凝血系统的改变,镰状细胞病(SCD)患者易发生高凝状态。尽管关注静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的发展在这一人群中,没有标准化的指导方针,常规血栓预防。本研究的目的是评估2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行之前和期间成人和儿科SCD治疗人员的血栓预防实践。在2020年5月29日至2020年7月13日期间,通过七个scd特定兴趣组向儿科和成人血液学肿瘤学从业人员分发了一份横断面电子调查。在93例总应答中,14% (N = 13)报告他们只治疗21岁以上的患者;38.7% (N = 36)的患者只治疗0-21岁,47.3% (N = 44)的患者同时治疗。我们的研究显示,在COVID-19大流行之前,96%的成人医生会推荐药物血栓预防、机械血栓预防或两者兼而有之,但只有76%的儿科医生会推荐住院儿童进行任何血栓预防(P < 0.0001), 24%的儿科医生根本不选择血栓预防。在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,94%的治疗人员专门推荐成人和76%的治疗人员推荐儿科患者使用药物血栓预防。这些发现表明,尽管缺乏针对成人和儿童血栓预防的循证血栓预防指南,亚专科医生仍会对成年患者常规提供药理学血栓预防,并将修改他们对静脉血栓栓塞高风险的儿科患者的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis practices for patients with sickle cell disease prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) are predisposed to a hypercoagulable state due to alterations in the coagulation system. Despite concern for the development of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in this population, there are no standardized guidelines for routine thromboprophylaxis. The objective of this study was to assess thromboprophylaxis practices of adult and pediatric treaters of SCD before and during the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. A cross-sectional electronic survey was distributed to pediatric and adult hematology oncology practitioners through seven SCD-specific interest groups between May 29, 2020, and July 13, 2020. Of 93 total responses, 14% (N = 13) reported they only treat patients more than 21 years old; 38.7% (N = 36) only treat patients 0-21 years old and 47.3% (N = 44) reported they treat both. Our study showed that before the COVID-19 pandemic, 96% of adult practitioners would recommend pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis, mechanical thromboprophylaxis or both for hospitalized adults with thromboprophylaxis, but only 76% of pediatric treaters would recommend any thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized children (P < 0.0001), with 24% of pediatric treaters choosing no thromboprophylaxis at all. During the COVID-19 pandemic, pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis specifically was recommended for adults by 94% of treaters and for pediatric patients by 76% of treaters. These findings suggest that despite the lack of evidence-based thromboprophylaxis guidelines in adults and children with thromboprophylaxis, subspecialty treaters routinely provide pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in their adult patients and will modify their practice in pediatric patients who are considered at a high risk for VTE.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis is an international fully refereed journal that features review and original research articles on all clinical, laboratory and experimental aspects of haemostasis and thrombosis. The journal is devoted to publishing significant developments worldwide in the field of blood coagulation, fibrinolysis, thrombosis, platelets and the kininogen-kinin system, as well as dealing with those aspects of blood rheology relevant to haemostasis and the effects of drugs on haemostatic components
期刊最新文献
Variation among venous thromboembolism risk assessment tools for postcesarean patients: a retrospective cohort study. Is the combination of two automated rapid assays for diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia necessary? A novel SERPINC1 c.119G>A (p.Cys40Tyr) mutation with variable clinical expression in an Indian family. A novel γ-chain mutation p.Asp318His in a Chinese family with dysfibrinogenemia. Molecular mechanism analysis of a family with hereditary coagulation FXI deficiency caused by compound heterozygous mutations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1