对话和对话的倡导者——德基·斯密特谈对话

Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif Pub Date : 2013-12-14 DOI:10.5952/54-0-339

G. Akper

{"title":"对话和对话的倡导者——德基·斯密特谈对话","authors":"G. Akper","doi":"10.5952/54-0-339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The essay explores Smit’s thoughts on dialogue. In the ﬁrst instance, the essay reﬂects on Smit’s conviction on the need for dialogue in all human endeavours. Secondly, it explores Smit’s (together with Leon Fouche) analysis of four dominant discussants on dialogue, namely Hans-Georg Gadamer, Jacques Derrida, Richard Rorty and Jurgen Habermas. What the essay sees as Smit’s own idea of dialogue in relation to the four discussants is stated in the concluding part of the essay.","PeriodicalId":18902,"journal":{"name":"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dialogue and an advocate of dialogue - Dirkie Smit on dialogue\",\"authors\":\"G. Akper\",\"doi\":\"10.5952/54-0-339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The essay explores Smit’s thoughts on dialogue. In the ﬁrst instance, the essay reﬂects on Smit’s conviction on the need for dialogue in all human endeavours. Secondly, it explores Smit’s (together with Leon Fouche) analysis of four dominant discussants on dialogue, namely Hans-Georg Gadamer, Jacques Derrida, Richard Rorty and Jurgen Habermas. What the essay sees as Smit’s own idea of dialogue in relation to the four discussants is stated in the concluding part of the essay.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5952/54-0-339\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5952/54-0-339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章探讨了斯密特关于对话的思想。首先，这篇文章反映了Smit对所有人类活动都需要对话的信念。其次，它探讨了Smit(与Leon Fouche一起)对四位主要对话讨论者的分析，即汉斯-乔治·伽达默尔，雅克·德里达，理查德·罗蒂和于尔根·哈贝马斯。这篇文章认为Smit自己的对话理念与四位讨论者有关，这篇文章的结论部分阐述了这一点。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Dialogue and an advocate of dialogue - Dirkie Smit on dialogue

The essay explores Smit’s thoughts on dialogue. In the ﬁrst instance, the essay reﬂects on Smit’s conviction on the need for dialogue in all human endeavours. Secondly, it explores Smit’s (together with Leon Fouche) analysis of four dominant discussants on dialogue, namely Hans-Georg Gadamer, Jacques Derrida, Richard Rorty and Jurgen Habermas. What the essay sees as Smit’s own idea of dialogue in relation to the four discussants is stated in the concluding part of the essay.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif

自引率

0.00%

发文量